Xorkoth
Bluelight Crew
Well, gladiolus, I have observed over the years that every time someone asserts something that goes against the "common knowledge", most people immediately dismiss it, whether it's as placebo or misidentified substance or something else. I remember when the 4-HO-Ts/4-AcO-Ts besides psilocin first became available, most people were saying that their effects were the same aside from duration and perhaps smoothness. Some people even said that all of them were pretty much the same as mushrooms (!). But not a lot of people say those things anymore.
I think the idea that all esters of 4-sub-Ts are simple prodrugs for the 4-HO-T is entirely too simple of an explanation that has been reached without full proof or understanding, based off the assertion than 4-PO-DMT is a simple prodrug of 4-HO-DMT (which we don't even know for sure). Why would someone extend that to ALL esters of ALL 4-sub-Ts? It doesn't make sense to me, and since my and many others' experiences have shown otherwise, to me it
s just plain not true until someone provides conclusive evidence, which I strongly suspect will never happen.
It's the same sort of thing going on here with your 4-HO-tryptamine and 4-AcO-tryptamine thing. The common idea is that they're not active, so many people are dismissing it out of hand as false. The difference here between your case and my example is that I don't know of anyone but you who has tried either one, so there is really only your word to go by. However, that holds weight for me, at least enough to consider the possibility and think about why (as much as I am able).
I think the idea that all esters of 4-sub-Ts are simple prodrugs for the 4-HO-T is entirely too simple of an explanation that has been reached without full proof or understanding, based off the assertion than 4-PO-DMT is a simple prodrug of 4-HO-DMT (which we don't even know for sure). Why would someone extend that to ALL esters of ALL 4-sub-Ts? It doesn't make sense to me, and since my and many others' experiences have shown otherwise, to me it
s just plain not true until someone provides conclusive evidence, which I strongly suspect will never happen.
It's the same sort of thing going on here with your 4-HO-tryptamine and 4-AcO-tryptamine thing. The common idea is that they're not active, so many people are dismissing it out of hand as false. The difference here between your case and my example is that I don't know of anyone but you who has tried either one, so there is really only your word to go by. However, that holds weight for me, at least enough to consider the possibility and think about why (as much as I am able).

ownload&File=240dbfe92334362f8252e07e4c65891a