46K Drugs Prisoners Could Get Reduced Sentences

Jabberwocky

Frumious Bandersnatch
Joined
Nov 3, 1999
Messages
1,220
Location
Looking-Glass Land
46K Drugs Prisoners Could Get Reduced Sentences

Anthony Papa | 7/20/14 said:
Today the U.S. Sentencing Commission voted [3] to retroactively apply an amendment approved earlier this year by the U.S. Sentencing Commission that lowers federal guidelines for sentencing persons convicted of drug trafficking offenses. The vote could shorten sentences for tens of thousands of people who are already incarcerated and serving sentences for drug offenses by granting eligible individuals a hearing before a federal judge to evaluate whether their sentence can be reduced to match the reduced guidelines.

The underlying drug guidelines amendment was approved by the U.S. Sentencing Commission and submitted to Congress for review in April. Provided Congress takes no action to disapprove of the drug guidelines amendment before November 1, 2014, it will take effect on that date and courts may then begin considering petitions from incarcerated individuals for sentence reductions. Today's vote allows the drug guidelines amendment to apply retroactively. The U.S. Sentencing Commission ruled that no one who benefits from this reform may be released from prison before November 1, 2015.

Today's decision [4] reflects efforts underway in Congress and by the Obama administration to reform federal drug sentencing laws, as well as a broader effort to adapt federal policy to overwhelming public support for reforming drug laws, ending marijuana prohibition, and reducing collateral consequences of a drug conviction. In 2010 Congress unanimously passed legislation reducing the crack/powder cocaine sentencing disparity. Bipartisan legislation reforming mandatory minimum sentencing, the Smarter Sentencing Act, has already passed out of committee this year and is awaiting a floor vote in the Senate. Attorney General Eric Holder has made numerous changes this year, including directing U.S. Attorneys to charge certain drug offenders in a way that ensures they won't be subject to punitive mandatory minimum sentencing.

In just the past two months, the U.S. House of Representatives has voted to block the Drug Enforcement Administration from spending federal funds to undermine state medical marijuana laws and state hemp cultivation laws, and voted on Wednesday to allow banking institutions to accept deposits from marijuana stores and dispensaries in states that regulate marijuana. On Monday, the White House issued a Statement of Administration Policy that expressed strong opposition to a House Republican amendment by Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) directed at blocking implementation of a recent law the District of Columbia passed replacing jail time for possessing small amounts of marijuana for personal use with a small fine. The statement calls marijuana reform a "states' rights" issue, a groundbreaking policy position for the White House to take.

"It makes little sense, of course, to reform harsh sentencing laws proactively but not retroactively," said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance. "But that's what politicians do when they're scared of allowing people out of prison early. The Sentencing Commission really had no choice but to rectify the moral absurdity of keeping people locked up based on sentences that are no longer the law. What they did today was right and just."

According to the U.S. Sentencing Commission and a recent report by the Congressional Research Service, [5] mandatory minimums have significantly contributed to overcrowding and racial disparities in the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The BOP operates at nearly 140 percent capacity -- and is on track to use one-third of the Justice Department's budget. More than half of the prisoners in the BOP are serving time for a drug law violation. Even though African-Americans are no more likely than Whites to use or sell drugs, evidence shows they are far more likely to be prosecuted for drug law offenses and far more likely to receive longer sentences than Whites. With less than 5 percent of the world's population -- but nearly 25 percent of the world's prison population -- the U.S. leads the world in the incarceration of its own citizens.

As someone who has felt the sting of harsh sentencing laws after serving 12 years of a 15 to life sentence, I think the retro-application of the guidelines would balance the scales of justice, in reforming bad laws that dished out unfair sentences to individuals and allow them to be reunited with their families.
http://www.alternet.org/drugs/46k-d...t-reduced-sentences?paging=off&current_page=1
[3] http://www.usnews.com/news/politics...anel-to-vote-on-early-release-for-drug-felons
[4] http://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/f...ies/press-releases/20140718_press_release.pdf
[5] http://justicefellowship.org/content/congressional-research-service-report-mandatory-minimums
 
Great to hear, now we gotta do more!! This drug crime shit is ridiculous, legalize it all , take the black market element outta it and let it be. U can't scare people into not using drugs, it's just silly to think that given the history and the facts. It's America, tax the shit outta it and Make some muthafuckin money!! Lol
 
And if nothing else, don't put us into even more debt and create even more problems for every segment of society (except perhaps those invested in prisons and keeping them overcrowded and the criminal justice system overwhelmed with drug law offenders) :\
 
I was just talking to a reporter from a local news station the other day about ending prohibition and how it would benefit society I am very against prohibition and think the illegal aspect should be taken away from drug addicts and the drugs they need. It would keep criminals from making money and having taxpayers clean up the mess. Just think about our depiction of a opiate addict today we think of a "junkie" who robs, steals, looks like a zombie only living to get dope and stay normal. But in the early 1900s when opium was legal bought in a drug store the typical opiate addict was a stay at home housewife taking care of her family. So we see when the drug was legal addicts were able to live normal lives taking care of their family or making money for the house hold but ever since the drug was made illegal addicts are more desperate dangerous individuals. I could go on and on about why ending prohibition would be best for us, and to anyone who says we will have problems still if we do end prohibition all I have to say is of course we would there's no such thing as a perfect world it would have flaws but compared to now I see it being better.
 
Last edited:
^100%
All we need is the political will to fucking do it bro, it's all so obvious. The cost to society is way too high the way it is. Ugggghh I wish I could start all over again from about 12 yrs old with the things I've learned. Could've done something with this shit life and made a difference. I gotta go bang some chicks and start grooming the next generation of cliffys lol...
 
Haha do it up cliffy you da man! Spread your seed while your alive I figure I got one or two kids on every province in Canada which ain't bad haha I kid I kid I don't have any kids (That I know about lolol)


I think we should look at countries like Portugal where the war on drugs has been extinguished and instead of jail for addicts with drugs they offer them a chance for government paid rehab which costs society less than the war on drugs is plus the addicts can actually be better people instead of going to jail and becoming a hardened criminal. Portugal realised that the war on drugs was failing so they made personal amounts of drugs legal and cops will offer you rehab when they catch you and won't lock you up just for having drugs. They have done studies and the amount of youth that started using drugs In Portugal actually went down dramatically after the illegal aspect was taken away from drugs.
 
I read about this somewhere. Dude got caught with a decent amount of h , like 5-6gr and he got treatment. I think it said like up to 10gr for personal usage isn't a jailable offence there. Shit man here u get trafficking for a quarter oz of dope, end up doing ten fucking years, fuckin ridiculous time for such a small amt of actual material when u figure street dope is like 10% pure. That's always been crazy to me, the fact that the dope is that cut up. I used to sell coke and I'd try to put it out there at 60% for powder and 50% for crack and geez u really make a killing just wacking it down that much. Imagine getting some 90% dope in bulk and hitting it 9-10x, fuccckkkkkkk dude someone's gettin paid like a mofo. If legalized all that money could go toward a better society instead of to some Mexican dude who collect gaudy gold plated ridiculous looking guns lol...
 
Top