...warning about getting "burnt out on marijuana".
They believe in some 1-way I.Q. loss theory, once we touched it the doors of hell await to open, whatever. Maybe the $¢ientology version would sound better, from the guys behind Narconon... In my sacrificed province senator Jean Lapointe, owner/founder of a "therapy" center i think, received 3.5 million dollars in a « légaleezation » context (...), when just 3 ~ 4 hours asleep will do more for less. Much le$$! $¢ien¢e-for-$ale has went crazy.
It was as if cannabis corrupted us beyond any hope to ever repent, religion-fed style (to serve endoctrination of an utopia)... « Burnt out », really?? Too bad Providence didn't arrange a meeting between her and Carl Sagan, among many cannabis consumers who happen to have become emancipated/enlightened personalities - which is an anectote as good as any other i'd say.
Why "Just say No"? Is it vaguely about cannabis dosing abuse or just cannabis in general?... How about the ratio of dosing issues and comparisons to other solutions previously adopted by our self-serving politi¢ian$! Why not put money on health-wise alternative consumption methods designed to seduce rather than "control"?!
...at least we ain't got fentadope, yet...
YMMV. Our local TV insisted with one more twisted juxtaposition just last week, as i recall, prompted by the opioïds crisis and Québec's political response... Apparently "dealers" re-use their single-use ziplock$! Euh... Somehow cannabis was evoked within a few minutes while the Halloween parlance still inflated into our mesmerized minds. Unaware the commercial pubs had started while stunned by an impression of mediatic manipulation, on LCN not to name it - so it's no wonder as they're desperate for money.
Fentadope ziplock bags, who would have imagined!
Well there's a « perfect » crime and it's only Licensed Producers who can best perform it actually, e.g. defeating the « legal=safer » dogmatic slogan: Pest Control ("sanitory") Products without any combinatorial C(n, r) restrictions nor suitable long-term studies to analyze the cocktail effect of, say, C(96, 12) so-called legal savvy toxicity-boosted recipes - as if they could all get positively verified to pose no health danger over a person's lifetime. All of it considering the earlier in life one gets initiated the more he's exposed to cumulative risk, so PCP catalogs featured with *
NON-DETECTION* threshold levels don't particularily inspire me trust in a world where what's not banned is allowed, especially if that even includes myclobutanil (ref.: Zyklon-B, e.g. Level-3 poison on Chemical Weapons Convention), euh... In clear "nazi"! There's overall hundreds of PCPs in use around the world and Canada couldn't implement its cannabis reform without *
THAT*, really?! Hollywoodian Halloween scare scenarios target a naïve audience made of people holding the truth, the only truth and only the truth.
Looking back at the avalanche of non-sense since the rolling machine of James Albert Bonsack (1881 patent) the worse "danger" certainly ain't from cannabis. Governments pretend to protect youth printing large *
RED* labels saying "THC" even on CBD-only sealed packages containing NONE, ZERO. Over-taxing water which sell an equivalent of 5000 $ per litre - at that level of greed the understatement feels shaming.
Instead of letting emancipated adults decide the zealot$ want to dominate a market made sick by design and built for infantilized persons deemed either incurables and/or a deviant risk... All year long between 2 TV ads, preferably craft beer these days: it's a life-job for so many voter$!!
M'yeap! Downhill like a dark aby$$! And we're the fi$h.
...which they put in their soup!
Yea it’s good times. Took my dad years to accept its ok now, he grew up in a state where they’d take your car for finding a seed in the floorboard. I’m liking the brave new world, better than it was back in 1984.
") from setting up a shady lab and returning numbers that are 7% higher than other labs. I mean what kind of oversight do these labs actually have?
