Ok, tell us why you think that's good
Free trade does not equal fair trade. Bilateral trade deals between states are far more beneficial. The TPP was going to cost millions of American jobs, lower wages for American workers and give undue influence to globalist corporations who often hold no allegiance or loyalty to any state and its populace. Even Bernie Sanders and Democrats applauded this move.
I think he just watched the Taken movies. Do you have specifics to your "going after"?
Trump has pledged his desire to combat human trafficking. Obama claimed to do the same thing but trafficking busts were not substantial during his term and the anti-trafficking legislation he introduced was a joke, it stated that the minimum punishment for child traffickers was a $5,000 fine. Seriously?
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/27/ivanka-trump-human-trafficking-priority-240005 We've seen thousands of arrests so far since Trump came into office.
How is he investigating "electoral fraud?" Going to California to count all the illegal Mexican voters he says was the reason Clinton defeated him? Sorry for the tone, but this sounds copypasta from whitehouse.gov or something.
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/trump-and-pence-laying-the-groundwork-for-voter-suppression-with-new-election-integrity-commission-report/
Some do not believe that Clinton won the popular vote, or that the voting was conducted fairly. Investigating this will strengthen the integrity of the US elections and hopefully restore faith in the process. It also says a lot that Trump won yet is still investigating it. The states that are resisting it are the suspicious ones that need to be thoroughly investigated. My prediction is that Trump actually won the popular vote in a landslide, time will tell on this issue.
What promise has he fulfilled? Or OK, which is he "working hard" on?
Stop listening to only the Liberal media. They're not going to give you the full story or report objectively
http://imgur.com/a/V2jeL
Because it's all utter bullshit political theater. Yeah, they need some overhaul and I don't like the idea of private servers for the State Dept.
But every politician grilling her actively avoids saving stuff on the public servers. Colin Powell, her predecessor, urged her to keep the private serverHE had installed in the residence.So she kept an email address and used it. And a nation lost it's shit for a few months.
Wow you're simply being disingenuous here. It is not illegal for an official to have a private email address, but it is illegal to
consciously set up a private email server to conduct government business through. This circumvents congressional oversight and FOIA laws. I don't know care who else had a private email address, what she did was highly illegal and anyone else caught would've gone to prison. "But other people do it too!" is not an excuse, is not evidence and anyone suspected of doing this type of shit needs to be investigated and charged also.
You talking about the totally above board uranium rights deal with a single Russian company, still? And you must have SOME sense of irony, right?
Why was this above board? If Trump was caught doing this would you be OK with it? Podesta lobbying on behalf of the Russian government, receiving a billion rubles, Clinton/Obama signing off on a deal giving 20% of US uranium to Russia, and Bill Clinton receiving $500K for a speech from an investment bank with direct ties to the Kremlin? Is all that perfectly OK but Trump allegedly colluding with the Russians (without any evidence at all) sets off warning bells? I am curious as to how one can justify this. For the record I have no problem with doing legal business with foreign states as it can improve diplomatic relations and reduce the chances of military conflict, but goddamn, let's hold all of our elected officials to the same standards, shall we?
Can you please share with the class the moment she literally gave classified info to "foreign adversary" (see, it used to say "Russia" here, but that doesn't work so well any more). https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/07/us/hillary-clintons-email-was-probably-hacked-experts-say.html Anyone being honest with themselves knows that her server was hacked. Except it probably was not only Russia but also China, Iran, NK. She put above-top secret intelligence on an unsecured private server when that type of intel must only be stored on secured government networks. This is what we called evidence of a crime.
It was improper of her to meet Bill. Can you at least hint at what these crimes are? Glad we agree on something. Possible obstruction of justice and conspiracy. They all know they should not have been meeting while Hillary was under investigation.
How is it "obviously" a lie?
Because Hillary Clinton is a career politician. She was first-lady and then Secretary of State. She definitely knew what she was doing was wrong, and if she didn't then she should definitely not have ever been given a security clearance. This is fucking serious and some people are dumb enough to believe James Comey when he said that she showed "no intent" to commit these crimes. This is probably the most obviously blatant cover-up that I have ever witnessed.
Also this is not over. If Clinton won she might have gotten away with it, but since she didn't the investigations will continue and hopefully guilty parties will be brought to justice in the name of protecting national security.
Yes I want evidence. The fuck does "matter" mean? During Comey's most recent testimony (that was supposed to have sunk Trump) he stated that Loretta Lynch asked him to refer to the ongoing FBI investigation into Clinton as a "matter" instead of an investigation. This is evidence of obstruction of justice and collusion between Lynch and the Clintons, otherwise why would she ask that of Comey?
The Democrats going after Trump is beginning to backfire, and they are now getting exposed and investigated for their own nefarious acts. So I actually welcome these investigations and hearings as I have a pretty solid idea as to who is actually guilty of crimes here.
