you are living proof that this country really needs to spend more money on education.May he of sacrifice some of his principles in the process?
alasdair
you are living proof that this country really needs to spend more money on education.May he of sacrifice some of his principles in the process?
missing 'd' not the issue. what does "may he of sacrificed" mean?I missed the d on sacrificed because I am on a phone. Your ideology is illogical so you have to denegrate and name call.
if the bulk of the population felt the way you do, obama would not have been elected. twice....the bulk of the Population feels the way I do.
...the liberal media...
Fox News is liberal media. Media has traditionally been liberal. How you define liberal is up to you. Remember most people arnt arm chair socialist like the fine posters of ce&p so the medias opinions are to the left of much of the populations IMO
your definition of liberal seems to be anybody who doesn't completely agree with you...
alasdair
lol as you see it big guy. If you couldnt tell I dont agree with muchyour definition of liberal seems to be anybody who doesn't completely agree with you...
alasdair
Mind = BLOWN. Fox News is liberal? Give me a break. That's like saying Ronald Reagan was a communist.
No, the opinions espoused in the popular media is not to the left of much of the population...in fact, the opinions espoused in the media is the reason why so much of the population exhibits such conservative views when it goes against their own best interests. It's the reason why the Republican party has shifted so far to the right over the last 30 years. Seriously, Republicans from the 40s/50s/60s/70s would look at you like you're a giraffe if they were around today to see what's happened with their party.
Edit: I'll take being an "armchair socialist" over being an armchair crypto-fascist any day.
you are living proof that this country really needs to spend more money on education.
alasdair
May he of sacrifice some of his principles in the process?
Ron Paul, however I don't think that he's participating. He's probably the only politician in the US who has no intention to follow the agenda of the financial elite.
He's probably the only politician in the US who has no intention to follow the agenda of the financial elite.
that would have been lame. if that's what i did. but it wasn't. so it's not....and walk away, as if that somehow lets you claim victory.
Typo or troll?spacjunk
Anyone whose economic platform is laissez-faire is PRECISELY following the agenda of the financial elite.