2 different batches/experiences - which one real MDMA?

[whiteroom67]

I have had a couple of different and interesting experiences with (supposed) MDMA in the recent past. Mainly from 2 different batches. Now I have not tested either of these batches, but both came from reputable suppliers and claim to be pure MDMA (at least 84%). I'm asking this because I'm curious to get others' opinions based off of their experiences, so let me know what you all think. The first batch was tan crystals, and the second was white powder. I have heard that the difference in form like this could just be from the difference in how it is synthesized, but I'm not really sure. Anyway, the effect from the tan crystal felt a lot different from the powder. The dose was about the same, around 110 mg, and both were on a mostly empty stomach. All other conditions as well, even environment, were pretty much the same.

Tan Crystals:

-very fast (~10-15 minutes) and slightly uncomfortable come-up
-more intense, slightly rougher feel
-more dizziness
-more of an "enveloped" and "crystalline" feel (best way I could describe it - definitely did not feel I could act normal if I had to)
-deep connection to and appreciation of music - sensitive to the type and volume of music, did not feel like I could handle a club if I was in one
-more physical effects like sweating and increased heart rate (but physically still not speedy - I didn't want to leave the couch)
-felt more chemical, but more spiritually changing as well - probably due to increased intensity
-very sensitive to stimuli, very entactogenic
-peak lasted about 2 or 3 hours
-comedown quicker and a little rougher

White Powder:

-gradual come-up over the course of 30 or 45 minutes/no "blast-off"
-much, much smoother feel
-felt much more mellow and subtle (though as stated before, neither made me feel speedy)
-felt more in control, as if I could have acted normal if I had to (though I still didn't want to if I had to)
-Music was enjoyable, but the connection was not as intense and I could almost care less as to whatever was on at the moment
-not much physical effects at all, at least percievably
-felt more natural, almost like mescaline, but different
-not very entactogenic
-peak seemed to last 2 hours maximum maybe

Both were very empathetic, and neither were very psychedelic, but if I had to pick one to be more psychedelic, it would be the tan crystal batch. The white powder batch actually felt more like methylone, but considering the dose was so much lower than a typical methylone dose and closer to MDMA dose quantities, I don't think it was methylone. I was told neither were MDA, despite me saying I would be interested in trying it nonetheless. Both felt like what I was told ecstasy or Molly would feel like, just in 2 different ways. The come down was just as sudden for both, and there was little hangover from either one. When we got wind of people being uninvited to a party on the white powder, everyone kind of got brought down, which on the batch of tan crystals, I felt like nothing could bring me down.

My guess is either the white powder was weak or diluted, or the tan crystals was MDMA mixed with something else which made it much more intense. The powder made me feel like I could have taken more, while the crystals made me feel like I would have to be careful with my dosing much more meticulously.

Anyone's experiences with MDMA/ecstasy compare to either of these experiences/batches? Which one is the real MDMA? According to some of these official MAPS studies describing the MDMA experience, they would lead me to believe the much more subtle and mellow white powder is the real pure MDMA, while others' experience reports would lead me to believe that the much more intense and fucked up feeling of the tan crystals is the real MDMA experience. Don't really know what to think here. This also may account for when I see some people saying they take 100 or 120 mgs of MDMA while other people say they take 150 to 200 mgs.

 

[potionK]

Hey i think that the powder was absolute shit. That is all

 

[whiteroom67]

Oh yeah? LOL great analysis 8)

 

[Black]

we cannot tell you what the chemical you took actually is. in fact it's against bluelight policy.

regardless, except for the onset (10-15min? wtf? mdma usually takes 20-40min at least. unless you mean the time between the first alerts and the peak...) the first one sounds pretty much like mdma.

no idea about the secone one. sounds more like methylone, but again the comeup doesn't fit. methylone normally is a lot quicker; and also less mellow than mdma.

the best thing (if you cannot/don't want to bring it to a lab) is to invest in a test kit.

 

[whiteroom67]

Yeah I know no one would be able to tell me for sure what it was I was just looking for opinions.

No I wasn't talking about the time of onset I was talking about the come-up (time between first alert and the peak).

I already have a test kit on the way actually.

 

[goodvibes]

If your eyes aren't wiggling it's not mdma

 

[whiteroom67]

Yeah! That was another thing I forgot to mention too. I got eye wiggles from the tan crystals, but not from the white powder. The more I think about it, the more I feel like the white powder wasn't real MDMA. The only thing that stops me from really thinking it was methylone was the level of effects I got from the dosage I used. 110 mgs is typically pretty low for methylone from my experience.

See, if only the stuff was legal then we would know exactly what we are getting and the world would be a whole lot safer. But that's neither here nor there

 

[BlueBull]

We can't help you identify which drugs you took. If you don't know, we sure won't get a testkit or send your sample in for analysis, like Black said. Closing