N&PD Moderators: Skorpio
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.2,5-dimethoxy-4-astatophenethylamine (2C-A)
indelibleface
Bluelight Crew
![]()
dread
Bluelighter
edit. or should it be silyl? Either way, silicone analogs of alkanes would be an interesting group to pursue imo...planckunit
Bluelighter
methylseleno has been tried by shulgin "2C-SE" in pihkal.
edit. or should it be silyl? Either way, silicone analogs of alkanes would be an interesting group to pursue imo...
dread
Bluelighter
Assuming an aryl-xenide were possible, the departure of xenon wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing because atomic xenon is psychoactive.MattPsy
Bluelighter
But, yes, you'd get *some* secondary effect... sidestepping that whole "I hope when it breaks off it doesn't destroy my neurons with reactive products never mind how to make it and get it into me" technicality thing.
There may well be atoms that can be substituted how the halogens are further down the periodic table that have not been discovered yet that sit on 'islands of stability' irt. radiostability that wouldn't make you die a horrific death from irradiation, but the only point in making them would be for 'look at my ridiculous substitution' dick-sizing competitions
. They might not even be active at all, as they wouldn't fit in the receptor pocket, or perhaps not penetrate the BBB.
Assume for argument's sake that the theoretical xenon on the phenyl is displaced Sn2-style in the CNS and that 25mg of the parent compound was dosed.
So then you'd have roughly 10 mg of xenon in the brain, or 8x10^(-5) moles.
According to Wiki, xenon has 1.5 times the potency of N2O. 1.2X10^(-4) moles of N2O fills a 2.7 mL balloon at STP.
OK you're right.MattPsy
Bluelighter
Anyway, the average N2O whippet contains 8 grams of N2O (using the equivalence you noted, 8 divided by 1.5 is 5.33), so yeah, potency is a bit lacking
.
on a side note, I REALLY WANT TO TRY XENON.adder
Bluelighter
hamhurricane
Bluelighter
because iodine-131 beta decays into xenondread
Bluelighter
It seems a superatom made of 13 aluminum atoms can substitute to Br or I in every way... So I wonder if it would be possible to attach one of these into an aryl system?
Although, the resulting chemical would quite probably be too large to fit in the receptor... ![]()
2C-Xe can't exist because most existing xenon compounds are stable under -100 celcius... Example : XeO4 exploses at RT to give Xe and 2 O2...Saucy
Bluelighter
Haha thats great.
Good point! I always have this paranoia too.
No actually I set out to try to counter what you had said and ended up figuring out you were right.
It's 8 grams per charger; I'm not sure how much would need to reach the brain to achieve the desired effect, but it's certainly less than 8 grams. Consider:
Maybe Dr. Riverhaven knows.MattPsy
Bluelighter
greenmeanies
Bluelighter
sorry i just have to fix the misunderstanding
fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine, and astatine are halogens. they have 7 electrons in their outer shell, so they are highly reactive and make a single bond in most compounds.
you are thinking of the noble gases (helium, neon, argon, krypton) which have a full valence shell and thus do not make bonds (except for Xe which can make exotic compounds like XeF4)
'halogen' has a VERY specific meaning in organic chemistry-- it refers to F, Cl, Br, and I.
'halogen' in lighting can mean anything really, generally an arc discharge lamp that may contain mercury, sodium, neon, or whatever.
fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine, and astatine are halogens. they have 7 electrons in their outer shell, so they are highly reactive and make a single bond in most compounds.
you are thinking of the noble gases (helium, neon, argon, krypton) which have a full valence shell and thus do not make bonds (except for Xe which can make exotic compounds like XeF4)
'halogen' has a VERY specific meaning in organic chemistry-- it refers to F, Cl, Br, and I.
'halogen' in lighting can mean anything really, generally an arc discharge lamp that may contain mercury, sodium, neon, or whatever.
Indeed, Xenon is no halogen, lol. And they call this Advanced drug discussion, *sigh*