12 Y.O. Girl Has 2nd Degree Burns From SWAT Grenade Detonated During Wrong Door Raid

23536

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
7,725
Location
Stop resisting!
http://reason.com/blog/2012/10/12/12-year-old-girl-has-second-degree-burns

A 12-year-old girl in Billings, Montana, is suffering first and second degree burns on half her body after a SWAT team dropped a flash bang grenade next to her bed during a wrong-door drug raid on Oct. 9.

The Billings Police Department claims that the officer who detonated the grenade inserted it through the girl's bedroom window on a pole, and was supposed to detonate it while holding it up in the air. He mistimed the explosion however, and ended up dropping the live flashbang next to the girl's bed.

Jackie Fasching, the girl's mother, told The Missoulian that her daughter is in "severe pain." Fasching also told the paper that the officers didn't need to burn her daughter, or destroy her house, to conduct their investigation:

"A simple knock on the door and I would've let them in," she said. "They said their intel told them there was a meth lab at our house. If they would've checked, they would've known there's not."

Mr. Fasching, the report says, attempted to open the door seconds before SWAT officers battered it down. After the raid was over, no charges were filed and no arrests were made. Taken together, this information suggests that the Billings Police Department made several mistakes, ranging from burning a child to raiding the wrong house. A spokesperson for the department, however, says they had every reason (and right) to do what they did:

"The information that we had did not have any juveniles in the house and did not have any juveniles in the room," he said. "We generally do not introduce these disorienting devices when they're present."

"Every bit of information and intelligence that we have comes together and we determine what kind of risk is there," St. John said. "The warrant was based on some hard evidence and everything we knew at the time."

http://reason.com/blog/2012/10/12/12-year-old-girl-has-second-degree-burns
 
"Every bit of information and intelligence that we have comes together and we determine what kind of risk is there," St. John said. "The warrant was based on some hard evidence and everything we knew at the time."

Except the information was completely false and now an innocent child is scarred for life way to be contrite asshole. Would an apology be to much to ask for? I hope they sue that department into the ground.
 
What they did is terrible, but their attitude afterward is even worse.
No apology, but instead an attitude that they were in their rights to fire-bomb a girl because someone might have been making drugs (that people take to feel good/better) in the house.
Their own lack of solid information, and their trust in the false information that they had, were not enough to go on.
They had no right to invade a family's home, let alone nearly kill a girl, based on bad information.

(Then again, Bush started a whole war based on bad information. Maybe that is the way America works.)
 
That poor girl is now scarred for life, both physically and mentally, yet not even a "we regret that harm came to an adolescent girl."

Hopefully the family will be compensated big time for this, provided that they are not in fact part of some evil drug cartel from Montana (somehow I doubt they are).

As far as the apparent fact that LE did end up finding some sort of evidence at their home, I cannot help but postulate that the "evidence" was placed in the home by none other than oink-oink to fulfill their monthly drug bust quota.

Anyways - I think this is the first time I've ever read an article in DitM in which the setting of said article is Montana.
 
Top