Apparently it was an RC one, which according to him was $400. However, I had him bring up the transaction and show me and it was a little less. And no he didn't 'hurt' me, but he threatened to flush all my drugs? When I went to stop him he did shove me around a bit. He thankfully didn't do it, but he was real pissed. Yeah this morning we talked about the psychosis, and then a little after that I told him about that. We've been basically going back and forth about it all day, and still says that it was wrong for me to flush them (wanted me to hide them or something instead..) He also said that the drug itself doesn't cause it and I need to stop saying it's bad for his schizophrenia. Ugh... we compromised on some things but I hoped that he would've understood that it was only in good intentions to flush them.
lol.... HIDE ???
So he could just use again?
If someone had A DRUG I REALLY WANTED out of my grasp I'd lose my mind.
Or maybe he really would be thankful you hid them and then found a buyer?
I don't know.
Was it like kilos of the shit or something holy fuck?
The drug itself DOES CAUSE it (maybe not FOR EVERYONE but FOR SOME PEOPLE, yes...) and IT IS bad for his schizophrenia, I wouldn't say that if it isn't how I UNDERSTAND IT TO BE as I've studied the brain.
Most people ONCE they have a break from reality only ONLY only get worse THIS IS NOT ALWAYS THE CASE but TYPICAL.
If you've walked around in a city full of meth zombies you'd know exactly what I mean.
It is possible the breaks from reality he experiences ARE NOT CAUSED or TRIGGERED by these drugs, but set off due to panic and him not medicating properly (BENZOS) and perhaps if these states of thought (THAT RESEMBLE IDENTICALLY the state of stim. intoxication but without the drug...) were to happen NOT ON stims but just sober, he could be triggered to having an episode the same way?
That maybe is what he's trying to say to you?
basically no distinction though. Drug or no drug in his system, it is an aberrant neurochemical output and if there's a COINCIDENCE the drug is CAUSALLY LINKED you don't want to wait until it causes a perma-fried walking vegetable. Or stuck in "aberrant neurochemical output" and then they're going to be in a mental ward, or put on heavier antipsychotics etc... he doesn't want that. He's got to understand THAT much at least, yes?
Like even if the drug isn't causing it... it's associated, that's good enough to STAY AWAY.
There's some drug reactions that ARE NOT psychosis but if you have JUST ONE experience you should STAY AWAY. SJS symptoms, odd reactions that are troublesome or potentially life-threatening etc... like chemicals, drugs, can be very terrible on a human body. Without
in vivo experimentation it is hard to say that there is a CAUSAL relationship, no matter how likely, without knowing certain phenomena in a population of people (in which in vivo experimentation of humans is illegal etc...) so he could be right.
Maybe agree to what he's saying but that it SEEMS to spur it on, and that's enough to worry you, and you only want what's best and aren't a scientist and can't know what's going on in his brain?