California pot farm blasted by grand jury

23536

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
7,725
Location
Stop resisting!
Officials in a hamlet on the Sacramento River succumbed to the lure of easy money when they signed off on a plan to turn an abandoned housing development into a large marijuana farm, a grand jury said Monday.

In a blistering report, the Sacramento County grand jury said officials in Isleton had paid too little attention to the law when they approved a plan to build six greenhouses where marijuana would have been grown for medical use.

Officials in the cash-strapped town saw the plan as a great opportunity to turn a failed development into a profitable enterprise, City Manager Bruce Pope said.

Taxes and fees from the farm would have brought in as much as $850,000 a year, more than doubling Isleton's general fund, he said.

In addition, Delta Allied Growers would have bought Isleton's Police Department new computers and security cameras.

The City Council approved the project and the collective started installing greenhouses, a security fence and generators, and storing plants in the abandoned model homes.

"Then the D.A. showed up," Pope said. "She just lit into me, saying, 'You have approved a project that violates state and federal law.' It was crazy."

According to the grand jury, the project was in clear violation of federal law, which bans growing, distributing or possessing marijuana. State law is less clearly defined because of Proposition 215, the medical marijuana law that voters passed in 1996.

In May, U.S. Attorney Ben Wagner sent warning letters to Isleton and other jurisdictions about the federal law.

The project is now dead, and Isleton and its officials are out more than $200,000 in legal fees and lost wages incurred while complying with subpoenas to testify before the grand jury, Pope said.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/06/27/BACQ1K3DI9.DTL#ixzz1Qa3I68gH
 
I was gonna apply to work that shit, too. I'm tired of being unemployed.
 
We should be fighting harder than we are but we're stoners and fighting hard isn't what we do best. But I'm 52. Could the younger generation please get it together and plunder the corporations and the bullshit cockstains in Washington? My generation got all distracted with fucking disco. We need you now.
 
top lvl cali gov't send out a memo to all its departments saying "find ways to make money"
One group says hey lets turn this bunk development into a pot farm to collect bank
another group says hey lets find some people to bust for pot and collect the legal fees
collectively nothing gets done and no one its better off
 
We should be fighting harder than we are but we're stoners and fighting hard isn't what we do best. But I'm 52. Could the younger generation please get it together and plunder the corporations and the bullshit cockstains in Washington? My generation got all distracted with fucking disco. We need you now.

yeah, sure my generation will clean up the mess your generation started....:::thumbs up::::
 
This is so terrible. It's an obvious way to solve the unemployment problem, because the unemployment problem doesn't have everything to do with there being no jobs. It has to do with people not giving a shit about working for any of the companies out there. Open the floodgates for pot and you will mobilize a workforce full of people who believe in what they are doing and believe they are making the world a more fun place to live in.
 
you really think (p0t)legalization would have any significant effects on unemployment?
/mj+mmj markets wouldn't put a dent in unemployment #'s, and that's b4 considering that p0t-legalization would mean a bunch of unemployed folk from LE/prison/justice/etc sectors.
 
you really think (p0t)legalization would have any significant effects on unemployment?
/mj+mmj markets wouldn't put a dent in unemployment #'s, and that's b4 considering that p0t-legalization would mean a bunch of unemployed folk from LE/prison/justice/etc sectors.

I don't think it would hurt, at the very least. My honest opinion, though, is that if you make it legal to open shops, divert land, and have a generally open marijuana market, then you will see an incredible amount of migration toward California and other well-equipped lands, and a sizable jump in employment. In a free market, there are no magic "quick fixes" for problems like unemployment. What we can lobby for, however, is chipping away at the problem by removing harmful and undue government influence.

As for the LE "problem," they could switch to human trafficking, which is an enormous problem that receives little to no attention when compared to drugs. Plus, remember that busting people for marijuana doesn't actually create any wealth at all - in fact in costs more than just having those guys walk around writing tickets. I simply don't see the economics behind LE doing something expensive and therefore being more valuable to the state. They could do almost anything else with their time on the job. Anything.
 
DEFINITELY wouldn't hurt, and i can agree it'd help a lot (just wouldn't help insofar as overall #'s).
if it's made legal-enough in CA that there's significant migration, other states will immediately adopt legalization. i know some states are far less suitable for cultivation than CA, but to be fair, ANY state in the US can be cheaply/easily amended to grow killer weed (unsure what you mean by "legal to..divert land"....sounds like something i'd disagree w/).
/gotta rush out this second, will adress other half of your post when back ;PP
 
^It wasn't that generation that started the mess.
It was Harry Ainslinger, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan.
And cleaning up the mess is really the only decent possibility now, anyway, regardless of who "started it".

Yeah, because those people are all from the same generation...
 
Top