'Failed Policy': Former Cops Slam War On Drugs

Tromps

Bluelighter
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
877
Location
USA
On 40th Anniversary Of War On Drugs, Cops Decry Obama's Drug Policy

WASHINGTON -- Forty years after President Richard Nixon first declared a war on drugs, the officers who fought in it are calling for a truce.

Former law enforcement officials gathered in the District of Columbia on Tuesday to announce their new report. It details the failures of the government's long battle against illegal drugs and denounces the Obama administration's current drug policies.

"Since President Nixon declared 'war on drugs' four decades ago, this failed policy has led to millions of arrests, a trillion dollars spent and countless lives lost, yet drugs today are more available than ever," said Norm Stamper, former chief of police in Seattle and a speaker for legalization-advocacy group Law Enforcement Against Prohibition.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/15/40-anniversary-war-on-drugs-cops-obama_n_877702.html


Yeah, whats new :\
 
why doesn't LEAP participate in discussions on Bluelight? It's the largest online drug community in the world.
 
^ Is bluelight really that big? :|

Wonder if any government will ever listen :/
 
I will state it again:


No U.S. administration is ever going to revamp their drug policies until American citizens become fed up with it and become increasingly agitated, violent, and demand change in the form of mass protests etc.
 
Violence might (ok would) draw attention, but it's hardly a good image to put out is it?
 
Here's an interesting Open Letter to Obama re: the War on Drugs and Obama's denial of its failure.

from http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/06/15/2266685/time-to-end-drug-war.html

By Leonard Pitts Jr.
[email protected]
Dear President Obama:

Right after your election, somebody asked if I thought having a black president meant black people’s concerns would now receive attention at the executive level. I told them I expected the opposite.

There used to be a saying – only Nixon could go to China. Meaning, of course, that only he, as a staunch anti-communist, had the credibility to make overtures to that nation without accusations of being soft on communism. By the inverse of that political calculus, I never expected that you, as a black man, would do much to address black issues.

And the limitations of your presidency where African Americans are concerned have never been more obvious than they are this week.

On Friday it will be 40 years since the aforementioned President Nixon asked Congress for $155 million to combat a problem he said had “assumed the dimensions of a national emergency.” Thus was born the War on Drugs.

Seven presidents later, the war grinds on. And if it has made even a dent in drug use, you could not prove it by me — nor, I would wager, by most observers.

Last week, the Global Commission on Drug Policy, a group of international leaders including Kofi Annan, the former secretary general of the United Nations, issued a report that begins with this unambiguous declaration: “The global war on drugs has failed.” Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, a group of cops, judges and other law women and men, calculates we have made 40 million arrests and sunk a trillion dollars into that failure. This week, it issued its own report, criticizing you for talking a good game but doing precious little when it comes to reframing drug abuse as a matter of public health — not criminal justice.

Frankly, Mr. President, you should take this one personally. As you must know, the War on Drugs has been, in effect, a war on black men. Though whites are the nation’s biggest users and dealers of illicit drugs, blacks are the ones most likely to be jailed for drug crimes and to suffer the disruption of families and communities that comes with it.

You have done little to address these and other racial inequities of the criminal injustice system.

Here’s the exception that proves the rule: Until recently, sentencing guidelines treated one gram of crack cocaine (i.e., the “black” drug) the same as 100 grams of regular cocaine (i.e., the “white” drug). You signed a law changing that 100-to-one disparity. It is now an 18-to-one disparity. Pardon me if I don’t break out the confetti.

Here’s the thing, Mr. Obama: Our last three presidents are known — or in George W. Bush’s case, strongly believed — to have used illicit drugs when they were young. None of you were caught.

But what if you had been? They might have been given a second chance by some judge who saw merit or potential in them. They might still have gone on to become productive men.

Mr. President, what do you think would most likely have happened to you?

You know the answer as well as I do. And what you know should compel you to do something about it. No, that might not be politic, but it would definitely be right.

The most fitting way to mark the 40th anniversary of the War on Drugs is to ensure the 41st never comes.
 
Right after your election, somebody asked if I thought having a black president meant black people’s concerns would now receive attention at the executive level. I told them I expected the opposite.

There used to be a saying – only Nixon could go to China. Meaning, of course, that only he, as a staunch anti-communist, had the credibility to make overtures to that nation without accusations of being soft on communism. By the inverse of that political calculus, I never expected that you, as a black man, would do much to address black issues.

And the limitations of your presidency where African Americans are concerned have never been more obvious than they are this week.

On Friday it will be 40 years since the aforementioned President Nixon asked Congress for $155 million to combat a problem he said had “assumed the dimensions of a national emergency.” Thus was born the War on Drugs.

Seven presidents later, the war grinds on. And if it has made even a dent in drug use, you could not prove it by me — nor, I would wager, by most observers.

Last week, the Global Commission on Drug Policy, a group of international leaders including Kofi Annan, the former secretary general of the United Nations, issued a report that begins with this unambiguous declaration: “The global war on drugs has failed.” Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, a group of cops, judges and other law women and men, calculates we have made 40 million arrests and sunk a trillion dollars into that failure. This week, it issued its own report, criticizing you for talking a good game but doing precious little when it comes to reframing drug abuse as a matter of public health — not criminal justice.

Frankly, Mr. President, you should take this one personally. As you must know, the War on Drugs has been, in effect, a war on black men. Though whites are the nation’s biggest users and dealers of illicit drugs, blacks are the ones most likely to be jailed for drug crimes and to suffer the disruption of families and communities that comes with it.

You have done little to address these and other racial inequities of the criminal injustice system.

Here’s the exception that proves the rule: Until recently, sentencing guidelines treated one gram of crack cocaine (i.e., the “black” drug) the same as 100 grams of regular cocaine (i.e., the “white” drug). You signed a law changing that 100-to-one disparity. It is now an 18-to-one disparity. Pardon me if I don’t break out the confetti.

Here’s the thing, Mr. Obama: Our last three presidents are known — or in George W. Bush’s case, strongly believed — to have used illicit drugs when they were young. None of you were caught.

But what if you had been? They might have been given a second chance by some judge who saw merit or potential in them. They might still have gone on to become productive men.

Mr. President, what do you think would most likely have happened to you?

You know the answer as well as I do. And what you know should compel you to do something about it. No, that might not be politic, but it would definitely be right.

The most fitting way to mark the 40th anniversary of the War on Drugs is to ensure the 41st never comes.

+1

I will state it again:


No U.S. administration is ever going to revamp their drug policies until American citizens become fed up with it and become increasingly agitated, violent, and demand change in the form of mass protests etc.

Corporations are going to see how much profit is truly in drugs, adn they will lobby to legalize them, and the cartels won't go down easy. Legal corporations vs Illegal ones. It's going to be a shit storm.

But I digress. The point is they'll never legalize anything over what you and I think. Or what scientists have proven. It's all about paying for a few Congrsssmen's campaigns to lobby for drug legalization for profit
 
But I digress. The point is they'll never legalize anything over what you and I think. Or what scientists have proven. It's all about paying for a few Congrsssmen's campaigns to lobby for drug legalization for profit

Bingo. The whole things about the money. Too much money in it, too much money against it. It's sad really.
 
+1



Corporations are going to see how much profit is truly in drugs, adn they will lobby to legalize them, and the cartels won't go down easy. Legal corporations vs Illegal ones. It's going to be a shit storm.

But I digress. The point is they'll never legalize anything over what you and I think. Or what scientists have proven. It's all about paying for a few Congrsssmen's campaigns to lobby for drug legalization for profit

sometimes i hate america
 
I will state it again:


No U.S. administration is ever going to revamp their drug policies until American citizens become fed up with it and become increasingly agitated, violent, and demand change in the form of mass protests etc.


Exactly, except there is no need for violence. That will just make the movement towards legalization of ALL drugs look bad.

THE US gov't WILL NEVER make ANY drugs legal, including MARIJUANA! IT WILL NEVER EVER EVER HAPPEN. The only way drugs would become legal is if society fell apart and there was no government... The government makes way too much money off illegal drugs by having them ILLEGAL to ever wanna make them legal.. Plus its just one more reason for them to lock you up and take away your freedom. I swear anyone that thinks drug users should be locked up and their lives ruined by "charges on their records" are the most evil sadistic people in the world. That is why I hate cops.
 
Nothing this big will ever change without revolution. Not necessarily a violent one, but one involving plenty of public attention and headline-grabbing action. Too much is at stake for the U.S. to "kindly withdraw" from the drug war, like:

*Money--from lobbyists for Big Pharma, alcohol, tobacco and other industries who line their pockets to reinforce the distinction between legal and illegal drugs.

*Power--classism involving mass incarceration of poor people and minorities, who then provide a free source of labor in prisons. Controlling our minds and bodies to prevent another 1960s-scale uprising. Monopolizing the drug trade, making us dependent on Big Pharma to treat every cough, sneeze and fart.

*Image--admitting a mistake = showing weakness in the govt.'s eyes. Imagine all the potential criticism that would arise if the drug war were suddenly called off. No politician wants to get the Jimmy Carter treatment for appearing "soft" on drugs, period.

I commend every person who speaks out against the WOD, but it's going to take more than that to affect real change.
 
In all honesty I am starting to realize its pretty much pointless to even hope that one day the war on drugs will be over and the day when theres no such thing as an illegal "substance." Lets face it the people that want the war on drugs to be over are the minority. 90% of the people in the world are brainwashed wallabies that just "go with the flow." They can't make up their mind themselves.

The only way this will change is if we get a new government
 
Last edited:
Top