right way to inhale from a lightbulb vaporizer

[gib65]

I've been thinking lately of the right way to vaoprize JWH (or any RC) with the lightbulb vaoprizer.

Am I correct in thinking it is a mistake to allow the bulb to fill with smoke/gas/vapor before inhaling? That the right way to do it is to inhale as soon as the flame is lit?

I ask because some of my latest research tells me that what you want to inhale are the vapors that come of the liquid form of the substance. Everyone knows not to combust the stuff - that destroys the molecules - but I don't think everyone realizes that heating it to the point of boiling it (so it becomes a gas and fills the bulb) may also destroy the molecule. It's the heat that's the culprit in both cases.

Am I right?

If so, then the key is to suck up the vapors as soon as the substance is melted into its liquid form - and don't wait for it to convert to gas form. gas != vapor

Am I right?

 

[Psychedelic Jay]

NO. You actually need to wait until you can physically see vapor. If you start to inhale too soon, you will miss a lot of vapor and cut your inhale to short....

Can I request this thread move to BDD?

 

[sekio]

Liquid is not vapour. Gas is vapour. The only way you "vapourise" and don't burn a substance is if it's heated to around or above the boiling point - if you're using a lighter and a lightbulb you won't have the needed temperature control and will probably burn it.

 

[Psychedelic Jay]

He won't burm too much if he waves the flame under the bulb verses letting it heat up one spot.

 

[gib65]

Liquid is not vapour. Gas is vapour.

Yes, but even liquid gives of vapours.

if you're using a lighter and a lightbulb you won't have the needed temperature control and will probably burn it.

Yeah, that's what I'm afraid of.

He won't burm too much if he waves the flame under the bulb verses letting it heat up one spot.

Thanks for the tip.

Isn't the case with these things that, depending on how well you can vapourize, there will always be some gas molecules that are burnt but others that aren't? And it's all a matter of how well you can control the ratio of burnt to unburnt? So theoretically, even if I smoked it in a pipe with the flame engulfing it, I should feel more of the expected effect if my dosage is high enough, right? The question is, how much is enough?

 

[Psychedelic Jay]

Isn't the case with these things that, depending on how well you can vapourize, there will always be some gas molecules that are burnt but others that aren't? And it's all a matter of how well you can control the ratio of burnt to unburnt? So theoretically, even if I smoked it in a pipe with the flame engulfing it, I should feel more of the expected effect if my dosage is high enough, right? The question is, how much is enough?

No. Putting it directly to a flame will destroy literally all of it. You will probably inhale way more toxic burt mess than the drug you are trying to get...

Vaporizing is not nearly this high in temperature....

 

[dove121]

Do not use direct flame.