US - Chris Rickert: Fake pot ban a pointless game of whack-a-mole

edgarshade

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
1,954
Location
UK
Wisconsin State Journal
CHRIS RICKERT - Posted: Friday, January 7, 2011 4:20 pm

With reader comments

http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/chris_rickert/article_b4b4ec3c-1aad-11e0-a7f7-001cc4c03286.html

Remember the Salvia epidemic? No?
What about all the current devastation wrought by synthetic cannabinoid use? You know, all that devastation like, well ... getting high.
If that's the best you can come up with you're doing better than most. Even those who would know about any uptick in crime, overdoses or other highness-related mayhem seem downright unfazed by the substances.
Salvia — an herb that can cause hallucinations — was "not showing up on our radar," the alcohol and drug coordinator at La Follette High School, told this newspaper in the spring of 2007. Local law enforcement had similar responses.
Nevertheless, the state made it illegal in March. Dane County has never used the statute to charge anyone.
Now, instead of salvia, the head shops are selling incense known by names like Spice and K2 that are sprayed with a synthetic cannabinoid and when smoked produce a marijuana-like effect.
And just as with the salvia craze-that-wasn't, officials are largely unable to produce evidence of the ill effects of fake pot as they simultaneously move to outlaw it.
"We don't deal with it because it's not a problem around here," said Sgt. Gordy Disch of the Dane County Narcotics and Gang Task Force.
Dane County is working on an ordinance to outlaw its sale and possession, and Andrew Nowlan, a staffer for Republican State Rep. Garey Bies, of Sister Bay, said Bies and Senate co-sponsors plan to introduce a bill to outlaw it statewide.
"It's a lot more common thing than I thought it was," Nowlan said, even as he was hard-pressed to put a figure on exactly how common.
I don't doubt synthetic marijuana can be dangerous. As Disch points out, anything that impairs the senses can impair driving and cause accidents. It's just that synthetic marijuana — which Disch said has been similar to the salvia phenomenon — so far isn't doing that.
There's at least an argument for the continued war against real marijuana, as its production fuels violence in places like Mexico. But criminalizing the fake marijuana highs of a miniscule number of people seems about as useful as, say, betting on an increase in the state's beer tax.
Beer contributes to more social problems — like drunken driving and binge drinking — than fake pot could ever hope to. Yet this legal high is so politically sacrosanct that the Legislature has consistently rejected efforts to increase the rate at which it is taxed — now among the lowest in the nation. If ever there were a "sin" ripe for taxation, you'd think beer would be it.
Besides, it's not hard to figure out what will happen once synthetic pot is outlawed.
"They're just going to come out with other things that are legal," said Jim Trudeau, manager at Madison's Sunshine Daydream, which sells "incense."
And the state's whack-a-mole exercise will continue, as the real pest gets off (almost) scot-free.
 
One of the reader comments...

robinmadison said on: January 7, 2011, 6:53 pm
You want to smoke it behind your closed doors, fine, no one will know. You make it legal, and it becomes a socially acceptable behavior, and all sorts of people (mainly children) are going to get hooked, because there is no longer the chance of "getting in trouble."

The problem is we end up PAYING for these people. We pay for their "addiction treatments" and we give them welfare when they can't hold down a job.

You want to do drugs and be a loser? FINE. But NO MORE tax dollars for "treatment" programs, drug testing for people on welfare and college kids getting federal money, etc. My tax dollars should NOT support YOUR drug habit, or your attempt to recover from it. You want to do the same for alcohol abuse fine. Stop wasting MY MONEY to fix YOUR BAD DECISIONS.

Everyone is a "libertarian" when it comes to legalizing drugs, but when it actually comes time to hold people accountable for their bad choices in life, we get soft.
 
^ I doubt that many are seeking treatment for "Spice."

Perhaps not. But he makes a good point that Everyone is a "libertarian" when it comes to legalizing drugs, but when it actually comes time to hold people accountable for their bad choices in life, we get soft.

There was a thread on BL once about giving out free needles for harm reduction. I think I was the only one who spoke out AGAINST it. While I believe needles should be legally available to anybody who wants to BUY them, I don't believe the taxpayers should pay to subsidize anybody's drug use.
 
the city I live in has a budget deficit of 115 million. Most of the money it collects goes to paying police salaries. It pays 60 million annually in pensions alone.

that's pensions: money given to retired officers
 
Taxpayers already probably pay more to deal with the problems of alcohol use than drug use, not including the war on drugs. But drug use, including alcohol shouldn't be subsidized any more than necessary. It just gives the opposition more fuel for their arguments.
 
And your point is... ???

obvious I thought. Seeing as much of policework in urban American cities is devoted to drug enforcement, and all policework is publicly funded, one has to ask: is the huge investment the taxpayers make in policing themselves against drug use paying off?

Enforcement is a much bigger drain on the taxpayer than treatment (though I don't agree with publicly-funded treatment either).
 
Not to mention all the unpaid medical bills, alone with the general spread of diseases from addicts who can't get clean needles.

Treatment in the long run saves money, as well as helps get those who need help (addicts, remember anyone can become an addict), help. The well being of a community relies on some give and take, as well as compassion. We all benefit from the prevention of diseases from spreading, the spread of harm reduction values, and the small number of homeless addicts who reside in our communities.

The on drugs is a bigger waste of tax dollars. We spend ridiculous amount on enforcement, as well as incarcerating our non-violent criminals (which further promotes this "under belly" of society). Treatment is the only way to make progress as a nation.
 
Top