Couple's first home is a meth house

spini4

Bluelighter
Joined
Nov 18, 2003
Messages
795
Bristol Borough, Pennsylvania (CNN) -- Jenn Friberg makes her way down the upstairs hallway to the master bedroom. The clacking of her high-heeled boots against the hardwood floor echoes throughout the two-story house.

She sits down on the edge of a faded yellow chair and taps the window while her boyfriend leans on the doorframe.

"We found out that one of the telltale signs of a meth house is frosted windows," said Friberg, 30.

Friberg and Rob Quigley bought their four-bedroom house on Jefferson Avenue in March. The 108-year-old house had everything they were looking for in a starter home: old world charm, a backyard and plenty of space for a nursery in the future.

The location outside Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was ideal -- equal distance from their jobs, near the Delaware River and within the city's historic district.

Priced at $190,000, the house was within their budget and the independent home inspection gave the all-clear.

The couple also received a certificate of approval from the borough inspector stating that a general inspection revealed "no imminent hazards" and the home was "in compliance" with borough codes.

The couple thought they had done everything right.
Days after buying their first home together, Jenn Friberg and Rob Quigley found out it used to be a meth house.

But there was one thing missing from the to-do list for the first-time homebuyers: a test for methamphetamine.

"It's horrifying," said Quigley, 31. "This is the worst possible thing that could happen to a homebuyer. Period."

Routine home inspections generally do not include searching for signs of meth labs, according to David Tamny, president of the American Society of Home Inspectors.

"That would be well beyond the scope and well beyond states' statutes for home inspectors," he said. "There are certain trainings or awareness seminars, but there's never been much more than voluntary participation."

Tamny, who owns a property inspection company in Columbus, Ohio, said the burden is on the buyers to find out whether the home they are interested in may have been used as a drug lab.

"If there's a special concern, ask the inspector," he said. "The stereotype [for a meth lab] isn't accurate anymore. It's not specific to rural areas."

Roughly five days after they moved in, Quigley learned from a neighbor that the house had been a meth lab.

Shocked, he retreated indoors and typed his new address into a Google search bar. There it was in black and white: Their home was listed on the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's National Clandestine Laboratory Registry, a list of addresses where local authorities have reported finding drug manufacturing facilities or dumps.

The couple complained of having headaches, sore throats and difficulty breathing after moving in -- all symptoms of possible methamphetamine exposure.

"It was really odd," Quigley said. "I would go to work and it would go away. I would come home and it would just start again."

They went to a doctor, who confirmed they had inflamed lungs and nostrils, he said. A test of the house revealed it had low levels of methamphetamine.

The house originally belonged to a couple who passed away and gave it to their four sons as part of their estate.

It was listed on the DEA's registry after items were found in the house in March 2004.

No one has been charged with operating an illegal drug lab out of the home, according to public records.

In March, the couple bought the home from the estate, executed by one of the brothers, Francis Giagnacova. During the purchasing process, the couple was not made aware of the DEA listing.

None of the Giagnacova family members could be reached for comment on the discovery of drugs or drug equipment at the house. Giagnacova's real estate agent refused to comment when contacted by CNN.

Friberg and Quigley's real estate agent said he was as blindsided as his clients.

"I have never seen anything like this in the 20 years I've been in the business," said Ellis Harrison, who also helped Quigley's parents buy their home.

"It's ugly and I wish I had the solution. Anything that could be done for these kids would help."

Harrison called the district attorney's office for answers after learning of the home's history from Quigley. The DA's office confirmed the home had been used to manufacture methamphetamine.

There is nothing in Pennsylvania's state disclosure laws that specifically addresses having knowledge of meth labs, said Henry Lerner of the Pennsylvania Association of Realtors.

"The law does not have a question about meth labs for the seller disclosure form," Lerner said, adding that there are broader questions that refer to knowledge of hazardous substances or environmental concerns.
I have never seen anything like this in the 20 years I've been in the business.
--Ellis Harrison, real estate agent

Friberg and Quigley contracted Bio-Clean of New Jersey, a blood-borne pathogen cleaning and crime scene restoration company, to test the house for methamphetamine.

Six rooms were tested, and five swabs tested positive for low levels of methamphetamine. The highest concentrations were found in the master bedroom, where it is presumed meth was being smoked, and the basement, where it is thought the meth was cooked, according to Bio-Clean's results.
 
That is simply retarded. You think wit all the meth laws and what not there would be a law sayin home buyer need to know the house was a former meth lab.

It's unconstitutional to force anyone to disclose if their house was ever used as a meth lab, it could violate one's right against self-incrimination.
 
Rog as the article said, anyone can access the DEA clandestine lab registry or whatever, i went on it once, its not hard to find out if your house was a droog lab (long as it got busted, of course)
 
I feel like if the house was once used for a clandestine lab, there should be proper decontamination, or if it is beyond the ability to clean, the house should be condemned.

The problem is, if the house was used for a clandestine lab, and the lab was never busted, there would be no way to know the potential dangers. The person could have been very on the top of his game, or he could have been a piece of trash who was putting people at lives.
 
Cant they just fumagate the property n dehumidify it?

cost a few k.. im sure they made that from having these articles published..
 
K, someone used to make meth there. Sofuckingwhat?

lmao- Maybe because cooks leave some of those labs fucking toxic, just like whoever did batches at that house. Thats why the new home owner had to see a doctor. Make more sense?
Thats fucked, hopefully the people dont get stuck with a home that is a toxic waste site.
 
You do realize it is possible to detect minute levels of just about anything? If a few nanograms of meth was gonna hurt you desoxyn would have been pulled off the market years ago. Sounds like they bought a house they couldn't afford, and saying it's haunted is so 70's, so hey it's A METH LAB. BUT THE CHILDREN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
You do realize it is possible to detect minute levels of just about anything? If a few nanograms of meth was gonna hurt you desoxyn would have been pulled off the market years ago. Sounds like they bought a house they couldn't afford, and saying it's haunted is so 70's, so hey it's A METH LAB. BUT THE CHILDREN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What are the kids gonna lick the walls and get a few mcgs...weird how they focused on meth as the contaminate. A little meth residue is perfectly safe, the synth by products on the other hand..
 
^i kinda agree.
i think these people are psyching themselves out, i dont see how you could possibly get actual active doses of meth from contamination.
and if smoking the shit causes permanent contamination, then so many places/hotels and whatnot would be "contaminated". yeah the stuff from synth si nasty and shit but you can't expect someone to tell you it was a meth lab, especially if it hadn't been busted by the DEA, thats jsut silly/ probably violates rights against self-incrimination or something,
 
If the building wasn't properly ventilated or cleaned, a lab can deposit some nasty stuff, that you wouldn't want to inadvertently consume over a period of time.

If the DEA knows about houses previously used as clandestine lab, they need to take the efforts to properly decontaminate the building. I don't think that is to unreasonable.
 
^ Exactly. If it was a hotel room they were staying in for a few days, meth residue wouldn't be a big deal but considering it is a house they plan to live in and raise children in, I can understand their concern.
 
^Have you seen the episode where Jesse actually tries to sell the house and everyone that walks through it comes to the patched hole in the ceiling stained with blood and is just like uhhhhh....
 
heh yeah seen them all. In S3 or late S2 though, Jesse gets the house for a steal as Saul says there was nothing about a meth lab being disclosed.
 
If people cared about this sort of thing, they would legalize meth, so companies could produce it. This way, no one would go through the trouble of producing it clandestinely in a residential area.

I'm starting to believe people actually do not care about the health and well being of non-drug users, and that they would rather stick with the power trip of punishing drug users. This way, those who are harmed because of this are fuel for their power trip. 8)
 
K, someone used to make meth there. Sofuckingwhat?

Make and possibly use it. I don't think it's so ridiculous considering the confirmation of meth in the house, and that one of the new owners stated that he felt different.
 
Last edited:
If I had kids I'd be far more worried about cigarettes being smoked than meth. Meth is mostly vaporized, I doubt smoking it would trip a Geiger counter like ten years of cigs would.
 
Top