N&PD Moderators: Skorpio
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.Am-694 and smoking blends WARNING
MurphyClox
Bluelighter
I think nobody minds if I translate it (it's romanian by the way, or something very similar):
Did you try to use it to create a blend?
Gimme a PM if you can!

/navarone/
Bluelighter
He,if is a real wizard, should do them much as can.
"Territory" by Sepultura, gipsies are rebelling again and it's testing process going on.
PS: Black persons are better drug users but it's hopeless for them (no bush support) to figure how caucasians think and proceed.
' ?
Are you randomly copy-pasting words from the internet putting them together to make some sort of Dadaistic statement?
Seriously.....get urself toghether and use some proper English cause no one on this who entire forum understood what da bloody fuck you are saying.
I'm honestly starting to think that ur using some sort of online translator for your posting.
Mate, either you get right on track or sobner or later you're going to get heavily bashed and probably banned.
And please....even if I didn't catch a word of what you are trying to say...try to stay on topic, cuz it is obvious that whataver u said had nothing to do with the rest of the thread.hamhurricane
Bluelighter
there is a new report of someone smoking, i kid you not, 50mg doses of AM-694 which is utterly astounding considering this one binds to CB1 with picomolar affinity. He suggests the duration is quite short - the subjective effects are calm and anxiolytic - and there seems to be a ceiling on the intensity of the high which makes it difficult to go too far.
what seemed like a RC disaster may turn out to be a quite benign and satisfying chem, but there is still no way im smoking this one. also the person who reported the 50mg dose probably has one of the highest cannabinoid tolerances in human history, he also describes repeatedly smoking 50mg doses of JWH-018. he should probably be studied.StingRei
Bluelighter
there is a new report of someone smoking, i kid you not, 50mg doses of AM-694 which is utterly astounding considering this one binds to CB1 with picomolar affinity. He suggests the duration is quite short - the subjective effects are calm and anxiolytic - and there seems to be a ceiling on the intensity of the high which makes it difficult to go too far.
what seemed like a RC disaster may turn out to be a quite benign and satisfying chem, but there is still no way im smoking this one. also the person who reported the 50mg dose probably has one of the highest cannabinoid tolerances in human history, he also describes repeatedly smoking 50mg doses of JWH-018. he should probably be studied.
I agree. And LOL @ your last sentence.
I guess I'll remain on the fence about this until more is known about it.
JWH's are carcinogens? That sucks, and it's not like with the carcinogens in pot, where THC bonds to old cancer cells and kills them off, no such upside with JWH. I guess I dun right sticking to regular good ol booda.
I'd try anything, but seriously people, this drug is just too new to the world. For me anyway.
Impressive. I did a doubletake when i read that report. That is by far the most extreme example of cannabinoid tolerance i've heard of.
I am pretty sure that the reported 0.08nm affinity is an error - 0.80 is much more reasonable, and is consistent with anecdotal reports of potency (a little stronger than JWH-018). I don't have access to the original paper to even check that fact.
I thought he said that the duration was longer than JWH-018?
Can't seem to find the post at the moment...hamhurricane
Bluelighter
can you elaborate on the hospitalizations please? what sorts of psychiatric symptoms where they affected by, what doses were they using and how did they recover afterwards?
I'd try anything, but seriously people, this drug is just too new to the world. For me anyway.
How do you know it's AM-694 that's in these new blends? Are you just speculating or have you got evidence? Also most reports i've seen say AM-694 is better than JWH series but I guess it's down to individual tastes.
Have you got anymore information on the hospitalisations? How much were they smoking? If it's just light smoking i'd be worried but some people hammer the smoking blends and pure cannabinoids in which case it's their own fault really, over use of any drug with have side effects.
I guess I'll remain on the fence about this until more is known about it.
JWH's are carcinogens? That sucks, and it's not like with the carcinogens in pot, where THC bonds to old cancer cells and kills them off, no such upside with JWH. I guess I dun right sticking to regular good ol booda.
"JWH's are carcinogens?"
That's a theory. Might be true, might not be. Either way cannabis smoke is KNOWN to have carcinogens in it.
"and it's not like with the carcinogens in pot, where THC bonds to old cancer cells and kills them off, no such upside with JWH"
JWH is effective in anti-cancer studies...just like THC and other cannabinoids. You don't know what you are talking about. 
fryingsquirrel
Bluelighter
As an actual treatment for cancer? Or as a treatment for nausea associated with chemotherapy?
StingRei
Bluelighter
That's a theory. Might be true, might not be. Either way cannabis smoke is KNOWN to have carcinogens in it.
"and it's not like with the carcinogens in pot, where THC bonds to old cancer cells and kills them off, no such upside with JWH"
JWH is effective in anti-cancer studies...just like THC and other cannabinoids. You don't know what you are talking about.
Erm, I do know what I'm talking about to a certain extent. You really have nothing but spotty evidence at best that JWH may be effective against prostate cancer (that is all that my searching came up with). Link us to some better stuff if you wanna be taken seriously.
But nobody is proposing that the JWH's are in and of themselves carcinogenic, but rather that they are metabolized in vivo to carcinogenic metabolites. So they might very well fight cancer, and then be metabolized into something that can cause cancer elsewhere in the body. There are animal studies indicating that one of the napthoyl indole CB's (not one that's used recreationally) was carcinogenic (due to metabolism to the epoxide) and since the first step in metabolism is n-dealkylation, all the napthoylindoles should behave the same way...structural entropy
Bluelighter
But nobody is proposing that the JWH's are in and of themselves carcinogenic, but rather that they are metabolized in vivo to carcinogenic metabolites. So they might very well fight cancer, and then be metabolized into something that can cause cancer elsewhere in the body. There are animal studies indicating that one of the napthoyl indole CB's (not one that's used recreationally) was carcinogenic (due to metabolism to the epoxide) and since the first step in metabolism is n-dealkylation, all the napthoylindoles should behave the same way...
They've shown carcinogenic effects from the metabolites then? Do you have a link? I think I know what you are talking about, but I still don't remember it showing anything certain at all. Do we know what the metabolites are exactly, straight naphthalene or what?
many studies show that both cb1 and cb2 receptors when agonized have positive effects on cancer, not necessarily in humans, but still. All you have to do is search cb1 cb2 cancer in google scholar. I don't see why JWH would be excluded from this.MattPsy
Bluelighter
And - indeed - there's nothing special about some CB2 agonists compared with others in respect to their anticancer effects, the effect is mediated through the action of the CB2 receptor in a mostly ligand-agnostic way.indelibleface
Bluelight Crew
ebola?
Bluelight Crew
The CB2 receptor, which is located for the most part outside of the brain, seems to mediate many of cannabinoids' immunological and anti-inflammatory effects, mediating few if any of the psychoactive effects. I believe that the CB1 receptors are involved in the former two as well though. . .