• Select Your Topic Then Scroll Down
    Alcohol Bupe Benzos
    Cocaine Heroin Opioids
    RCs Stimulants Misc
    Harm Reduction All Topics Gabapentinoids
    Tired of your habit? Struggling to cope?
    Want to regain control or get sober?
    Visit our Recovery Support Forums

Benzos sublingual xanax questions. which pills? how efficient?

Status
Not open for further replies.
^well, that was dense, but the guy was quoting journal articles, which are what should be consulted on this matter. and his post was saying chemicals do not need to be water soluble to pass through the nasal membrane, right? the ones tested were fat soluble and that worked.

that drugs need to be water soluble in order to be taken sublingually or snorted is a bluelight myth.
 
any who doubts that the common benzos wont pass through the membrane under your tongue because of not being water soluble has never held a xanax under their tongue.

That was my example indeed. Triazolam is in the same class of benzos as alprazolam, and is also not water soluble. It's very easily absorbed sublingually. It even has 9% higher BA that way compared to the oral ROA.
 
^yea, i decided to cut that to avoid confrontational responses, but you got to it first. but that's fine, because it's true. ive taken triazolam sublingually as well, at it works. to be honest, even though i am not a fan of snorting benzos (meaning i dont), i did try the halcion nasally. the people giving it to me insisted. and they were right; it kicked in significantly faster than the oral or sub ROA. like good cocaine fast. i still stuck with sub, cause triazolam kicks in so fast anyway and i figure i fuck my lungs up enough with weed. still, it was no placebo effect, snorting it got you fucked up in no time flat, especially if you had been drinking before. people would be slurring their words literally 60 seconds after doing the line.
 
Weed has no correlation to lung cancer, your lungs are fine. :)
that you will not get lung cancer because of smoking marijuana does not mean it is not causing your lungs physical damage. if you are a regular smoker yourself, i would suggest doing some research on this issue, avoiding sites like NORML and wikipedia.
 
that you will not get lung cancer because of smoking marijuana does not mean it is not causing your lungs physical damage. if you are a regular smoker yourself, i would suggest doing some research on this issue, avoiding sites like NORML and wikipedia.

I've been smoking several grams a day of the Pacific NorthWest Super Dank for 11 years straight, like only 10 days without or something like that, and while I am sure it damages my lungs, I have smoked heroin and meth as well and other than coughing up black shit ( which my doctor said was just tar from dope and meth ) I have pretty impressive lung function... Just my 2,000,000 cents... <3
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top