• REAGENT TESTING & DRUG CHECKING Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Featured Link 1 Featured Link 2
  • RT&DC Moderators: Senior Staff

ecstasydata.org

Fjones

Fjones

Bluelighter
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Messages
3,326
Does this site still do testing? They haven't posted any results in awhile.

I am worried I wasted my money sending in a sample.
 
They seem to only update the site every so often these days - why not send them an email first to double check.

[email protected]

What pill are you having tested (if you dont mind me asking) ?
 
Did you ever email eData, Fjones? AFAIK they still do testing (updated pretty recently), but there's just not the demand there used to be for testing since the fees are so high. :(
 
this was actually the question i was needing answered. There is a need for reliable testing, for sure. Honestly, I don't think 120 is so bad. I was just concerned since no one sends in samples as much it appears.
 
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????????????????????????????????????

Holy shit. That was some abysmal typing. I was really hammered last night. I apologize. I didn't even remember writing that post.

Anyhow, so, this "chocolate dome molly" tested as "MDMA 1."

What I don't understand is, why it says there was no reaction to the marquis or mecke. In the note, it says that is unusual for pure MDMA.
 
Last edited:
Fjones said:
**Edited out jibberish per request of Fjones**
Click to expand...


jesus christ dude drunk typing FTML.

As far as i know they are still doing testing. I believe they lost funding for a while but got a new source of funding. Please update your post when you sober-up so that we know what the hell you are trying to tell us.

the thing you identify as chocolate dome molly is listed on there as tested 12/15/2009 100% MDMA: http://www.ecstasydata.org/viewtablet.php?ID=1859
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Now for the answer everyone is looking for:

Per the admins at eData, the lab has been less than reliable lately on getting the results back. They used to do it once a month, the last batch took 7 weeks. They've had some staff issues, so sometimes delays happen.

They are working on the eData website to be able to import more information about the pills, ect, and to include some data from the Swiss group "Streetwork".

Also (drumroll), eData has acquired some funding and they hope to be able to drop the co-pay back down to $30 by the end of January, assuming they can get the site changes in place by then.

Great news to hear from the awesome people at eData! :D
 
Fjones said:
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????????????????????????????????????

Holy shit. That was some abysmal typing. I was really hammered last night. I apologize. I didn't even remember writing that post.

Anyhow, so, this "chocolate dome molly" tested as "MDMA 1."

What I don't understand is, why it says there was no reaction to the marquis or mecke. In the note, it says that is unusual for pure MDMA.
Click to expand...

I have never heard of that. This one is totally over my head.

phase_dancer, where are you? :)
 
RedLeader said:
Did you get a reaction from marquis on this before you sent the sample in?

That is very weird.
Click to expand...

It had an immediate reaction to dark purple / black.

I am glad the lab tested it as "MDMA 1." My only concern is, if they don't know how to work a marquis test, should I trust their results of the more complicated lab test?

I mean, every other test on there that says "MDMA 1" says "purple/black" for the marquis.
 
well a gc/ms prints out a paper with a lil graph and a number representing the elements the pill is comprised of. I would trust that machine more than i would trust a person putting drops of liquid on scrapings then distinguishing what subjective color it appears to be.
 
Moral Decay said:
well a gc/ms prints out a paper with a lil graph and a number representing the elements the pill is comprised of. I would trust that machine more than i would trust a person putting drops of liquid on scrapings then distinguishing what subjective color it appears to be.
Click to expand...

I tend to agree, but it is very odd. Maybe there was human error involved in this reagent confusion, paperwork wise or something?
 
RavenousBlonde said:
I tend to agree, but it is very odd. Maybe there was human error involved in this reagent confusion, paperwork wise or something?
Click to expand...

This is the only thing I could think of.

Embarassing for Ecstasydata (or rather the lab doing the testing), especially considering the note on the website in regards to the inconsistency.

Excellent news to hear they have funding back. Now we just need a testing lab in Australia, but I won't hold my breath for that one.
 
Last edited:
Sameria said:
Excellent news to hear they have funding back. Now we just need a testing lab in Australia, but I won't hold my breath for that one.
Click to expand...

Just FYI: eData has tested pills from other countries before. I know the reputation of AUS customs, but you can always take a risk as long as you're smart about it, seems to have worked from the UK and other countries before....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top