White House Czar Calls for End to 'War on Drugs'

marsmellow

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Messages
2,942
White House Czar Calls for End to 'War on Drugs'

Kerlikowske Says Analogy Is Counterproductive; Shift Aligns With Administration Preference for Treatment Over Incarceration

WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration's new drug czar says he wants to banish the idea that the U.S. is fighting "a war on drugs," a move that would underscore a shift favoring treatment over incarceration in trying to reduce illicit drug use.

In his first interview since being confirmed to head the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, Gil Kerlikowske said Wednesday the bellicose analogy was a barrier to dealing with the nation's drug issues.

"Regardless of how you try to explain to people it's a 'war on drugs' or a 'war on a product,' people see a war as a war on them," he said. "We're not at war with people in this country."

Mr. Kerlikowske's comments are a signal that the Obama administration is set to follow a more moderate -- and likely more controversial -- stance on the nation's drug problems. Prior administrations talked about pushing treatment and reducing demand while continuing to focus primarily on a tough criminal-justice approach.

The Obama administration is likely to deal with drugs as a matter of public health rather than criminal justice alone, with treatment's role growing relative to incarceration, Mr. Kerlikowske said.

Already, the administration has called for an end to the disparity in how crimes involving crack cocaine and powder cocaine are dealt with. Critics of the law say it unfairly targeted African-American communities, where crack is more prevalent.

The administration also said federal authorities would no longer raid medical-marijuana dispensaries in the 13 states where voters have made medical marijuana legal. Agents had previously done so under federal law, which doesn't provide for any exceptions to its marijuana prohibition.

During the presidential campaign, President Barack Obama also talked about ending the federal ban on funding for needle-exchange programs, which are used to stem the spread of HIV among intravenous-drug users.

The drug czar doesn't have the power to enforce any of these changes himself, but Mr. Kerlikowske plans to work with Congress and other agencies to alter current policies. He said he hasn't yet focused on U.S. policy toward fighting drug-related crime in other countries.

Mr. Kerlikowske was most recently the police chief in Seattle, a city known for experimenting with drug programs. In 2003, voters there passed an initiative making the enforcement of simple marijuana violations a low priority. The city has long had a needle-exchange program and hosts Hempfest, which draws tens of thousands of hemp and marijuana advocates.

Seattle currently is considering setting up a project that would divert drug defendants to treatment programs.

Mr. Kerlikowske said he opposed the city's 2003 initiative on police priorities. His officers, however, say drug enforcement -- especially for pot crimes -- took a back seat, according to Sgt. Richard O'Neill, president of the Seattle Police Officers Guild. One result was an open-air drug market in the downtown business district, Mr. O'Neill said.

"The average rank-and-file officer is saying, 'He can't control two blocks of Seattle, how is he going to control the nation?' " Mr. O'Neill said.

Sen. Tom Coburn, the lone senator to vote against Mr. Kerlikowske, was concerned about the permissive attitude toward marijuana enforcement, a spokesman for the conservative Oklahoma Republican said.

Others said they are pleased by the way Seattle police balanced the available options. "I think he believes there is a place for using the criminal sanctions to address the drug-abuse problem, but he's more open to giving a hard look to solutions that look at the demand side of the equation," said Alison Holcomb, drug-policy director with the Washington state American Civil Liberties Union.

Mr. Kerlikowske said the issue was one of limited police resources, adding that he doesn't support efforts to legalize drugs. He also said he supports needle-exchange programs, calling them "part of a complete public-health model for dealing with addiction."

Mr. Kerlikowske's career began in St. Petersburg, Fla. He recalled one incident as a Florida undercover officer during the 1970s that spurred his thinking that arrests alone wouldn't fix matters.

"While we were sitting there, the guy we're buying from is smoking pot and his toddler comes over and he blows smoke in the toddler's face," Mr. Kerlikowske said. "You go home at night, and you think of your own kids and your own family and you realize" the depth of the problem.

Since then, he has run four police departments, as well as the Justice Department's Office of Community Policing during the Clinton administration.

Ethan Nadelmann of the Drug Policy Alliance, a group that supports legalization of medical marijuana, said he is "cautiously optimistic" about Mr. Kerlikowske. "The analogy we have is this is like turning around an ocean liner," he said. "What's important is the damn thing is beginning to turn."

James Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, the nation's largest law-enforcement labor organization, said that while he holds Mr. Kerlikowske in high regard, police officers are wary.

"While I don't necessarily disagree with Gil's focus on treatment and demand reduction, I don't want to see it at the expense of law enforcement. People need to understand that when they violate the law there are consequences."
 
"While I don't necessarily disagree with Gil's focus on treatment and demand reduction, I don't want to see it at the expense of law enforcement. People need to understand that when they violate the law there are consequences."

Scared cops are scared they'll lose their jobs. ;)
 
Roger&Me: Bingo. If you're really concerned about maintaining respect for the law rather than maintaining the number and salary of police positions, it's clear that ending unenforceable bans on drugs are the best way to do so. Every regular drug user is violating the laws of the US 24/7 simply by possession; respecting the law is pretty difficult when you've made a lifestyle choice the law prohibits. If laws like this that are meant as scare tactics to crucify the few who get caught and scare the rest were replaced by laws that one would reasonably expect most people to follow, maybe that whole 'respect for the law' thing could have a shot.

The fact that this new guy is already talking about controversial but important programs like needle exchange gives me real hope that we could see a policy move toward harms-reduction principles by the end of the Administration. I still doubt we'll see legalisation any time soon, but this could be the beginning of a major shift in drug policy. It's an exciting time to be an advocate for reform in this area!
 
People need to understand that when they violate the law there are consequences
what the hell is wrong with these people? if drugs are no longer against the law, this doesn't apply at all; and the message seems to be, they SHOULDNT be against the law in the first place

would this guy have said the same thing about that black chick who sat in the front of the bus..........................
 
Why is the "Law" here in the first place? Why do we have it? To protect the people and their rights, correct? Police are there to enforce the Law and thus protect the people and their rights.

However, it's become twisted to where the police and the law actually harm the people and abuse their rights.

We'd be a lot better off as a society if we didn't lock record numbers of people up for harmless acts like possession of marijuana, etc. We'd be a lot better off as a society if the government sponsored rehab and real drug education instead of funding fascist police forces all around the U.S. and equipping them with assault weapons, riot gear, etc. and so forth.

However, that would be a conflict of interest for those in power. Law enforcement, the courts, and the jail system is big fucking bucks, friends. So why should those in power give a good god damn about what's best for the people? Much easier and much more profitable to twist the Law to their own purposes. Who cares if it ruins tons of lives and makes this country a shittier place to live, right? :S
 
Ethan Nadelmann of the Drug Policy Alliance, a group that supports legalization of medical marijuana, said he is "cautiously optimistic" about Mr. Kerlikowske. "The analogy we have is this is like turning around an ocean liner," he said. "What's important is the damn thing is beginning to turn.

Well said!
 
it used to be a crime to be gay and pornogrophy was criminal. Ignorance is what causes this. People with liitle to no experiance with narcotics decide the laws pertaining to them. This would inexcusable in other areas of law making. If all of the dea and state narcotics officers were placed in jobs that would be required with legalization they would still get paid(probably better), I know that's a gross exaggeration but get the idea? Once we as a country actually change the laws we will kick ourselves in the ass we didn't do it earlier. We need to move away from big gov't and let states laws actually be respected by federal authorities to see changes if the fed doesn't abolish the CSA.
 
Scared cops are scared they'll lose their jobs. ;)

Too fucking right. These goddamn pigs are scared of losing their jobs because if drugs where somehow made legal imagine how many pigs would lose their jobs? The rest of them might actually have to defend the public against rapists and murderers ya know what the police where originally intended for.

Imagine that though a police force that was there to protect you instead of oppressing you. 8o
 
Hurry up white house and allow me 2 use (legal)Cannabis Sativa as opposed to socially except-able alcohol & benzodiazepines! The only things our current laws show is the majority/mass population is dis-informed on the subject.
 
^ more like hurry up and let me use psychedelics as tools for personal growth and use opiates as self medication!!! weed will always be cheap and legal, the drug laws can't make a dent in the weed trade. making weed illegal suits their purpose just fine though, as it introduces everyone to the black market, and we all know the conspiracy theories related to underground drug trade :)
 
Top