JerZfirE
Bluelighter
^^ I posted about PUSH recently and someone else about SHOP RITE.
Go back a page or two.
Go back a page or two.

Nobody died and left me in charge of the rating system but if we could agree on a basic rating system that would help. Tolerance, experience, geography and many other factors lead to largely different scores but we should at least standardize what each number should reflect.
For instance Phrozen and others are going on the notion that an average bag is a 7 is far different than what I perceive. You may be going by the scoring system used in schools where 70 is a C which is average and anything below a 60 is a F.
On a 1-10 scale, 5 should be average. If we all go by this and a few other notions, i think we'll be on the same page. Basically, can we all agree on the following basic parameters:
0 - is bunk shit, not even real, totally beat
1/2/3 - are your levels of below average
4/5/6 - are your levels of average
7/8/9 - are your levels of better than average
10 - would be the best shit in the world so 10s shouldn't be given out.
An average bag is what you generally get everyday in your particular city. A 5 in Newark might be much better than a 5 in Tennessee but it should typify what you get on a normal day where you live. So basically, most scores should be in the average range from 4-6.
A 7 is when you get something good, noticeably better quality than the average bags you usually get.
An 8 is for excellent qualitywhich is much much better than the average bag you get on a daily basis.
A 9 is an ABSOLUTE SMOKER which blows away the average bag you get on a daily basis and just about equals the best shit you've ever had.
So before you give out a 9 just think to yourself "is this about the best shit I've ever had?"
insanely pure (VERY strong vinegar smell) bags.
^
Does anywhere out of the northeast even operate with stamps?
I'm talking primarily deal with stamps too, not the odd dealer or purchase where you actually get stamps.
I've never gotten anything except for the wax bags. Occassionally they'll just be the bags with no stamp on it, but never gotten it packaged any other way.
To stay on topic:
I never mentioned these from the second to last time I picked up, a couple weeks ago now.
Stamp Name: HEADBANGER
Color: White bag, green/black?
Graphic (Yes or no, if yes describe): Weird picture of 2 heads smashing together
Count: 7.5
Quality: 8.7 (at least!) These were the best I'd seen in the last few months....probably since I had those "METH POWERS" over the summer.
Overall neat/sloppyness of bag, packaging, and stamp: Nice and neat packaging, clear stamp
Other Comments: This was the last time I picked up with Dope Boy. He was going to pick up another bun of it, so he sold me 2 of the bags he had and then was going to get me my other bags. He ended up getting much crappier bags and was a pissy little bitch until I traded him back one of the Headbanger bags for the crappier bags.
This pissed me off so it kind of ruined the experience, which made it all the more frustrating because that one bag was sooo much more potent than the others.
Maybe a letter grade would be better? A, B, C, D, and F?Nobody died and left me in charge of the rating system but if we could agree on a basic rating system that would help. Tolerance, experience, geography and many other factors lead to largely different scores but we should at least standardize what each number should reflect.
For instance Phrozen and others are going on the notion that an average bag is a 7 is far different than what I perceive. You may be going by the scoring system used in schools where 70 is a C which is average and anything below a 60 is a F.
On a 1-10 scale, 5 should be average. If we all go by this and a few other notions, i think we'll be on the same page. Basically, can we all agree on the following basic parameters:
0 - is bunk shit, not even real, totally beat
1/2/3 - are your levels of below average
4/5/6 - are your levels of average
7/8/9 - are your levels of better than average
10 - would be the best shit in the world so 10s shouldn't be given out.
An average bag is what you generally get everyday in your particular city. A 5 in Newark might be much better than a 5 in Tennessee but it should typify what you get on a normal day where you live. So basically, most scores should be in the average range from 4-6.
A 7 is when you get something good, noticeably better quality than the average bags you usually get.
An 8 is for excellent qualitywhich is much much better than the average bag you get on a daily basis.
A 9 is an ABSOLUTE SMOKER which blows away the average bag you get on a daily basis and just about equals the best shit you've ever had.
So before you give out a 9 just think to yourself "is this about the best shit I've ever had?"
^^^ Understand what you mean, Tried to be as non specific as Could be, But thinking back your correct if the boys were reading that it would not be a good outcome, Sorry about the post next time will think before pressing submit, Is there anyplace specific to post about stuff like that? or it is not allowed at all? thanks![]()
I generally agree with JTBrick's rating system...
My problem, however, is not with the rating system.. But with the raters.
Everyone wants to believe they've had lots of experience with dope and that the dope they've come across is an accurate representation of the full spectrum of product that is out there in the market.
Just because you've been buying dope in your area for 2 or 3 years doesn't necessarily mean you've been exposed to a diverse enough collection of dope to create an accurate mental rating system.
I don't want anyone to take offense... This is just a general observation. You can have a 5-year habit, but if you've only been buying dope from a small number of people who all deal in the same small area, it's quite possible that you haven't tried all of the stuff that is out there on the market.
If, however, you've been lucky enough to try product from multiple cities/regions, and have been able to sample a substantial amount of product from each of those cities over a long period of time, there's a much better chance that you've had a truly diverse, broad range of quality of dope and can accurately assign a representative relative "rating" to each sample you try.