Do you mean specifically in terms of color/visual emphasis?
I meant visual wise, which is entirely subjective ofc. My first good go with it at 20mg, i was seeing neon purple and orange slugs "hugging" each other. one would hug the other which would expand i thought it was going to explode. it would let go and the other slug would hug the first one and it would expand. This happened for hours along with other super vivid and again "neon" imagery. I don't know how to describe the experience other than saying neon. Mescaline to me is dreamier both headspace and visually though, and seems to incorporate more colors, any colors that come to mind. T2 i would say was more visual but in a different and in your face neon kind of way. With mescaline, I am prone to having OBE's but with T2 and 2C-E for that matter I am EXTREMELY aware of my body. Almost too aware. That same first T2 trip my consciousness moved from my third eye down into my gut. It was extremely nauseating and physical (almost more so than 2C-E), but I've taken it 3 times since, and now I get almost no body load. It's been a few years maybe I'll have to revisit. I also get pretty much zero body load from mescaline. Cacti is different story.
Of my course my "mescaline" experiences have all been from cacti,
That's going to change I'm sure.
I believe its difluoroacetic acid and yes I spose I'm taking a gamble, but it's not something I plan to take much of. Unless I really like it.
Who needs balls anyway they just get in the way.
You're right about Traschel's phenethylamine book in that it's vague af. Most experiences are described in 1 or 2 sentences, so there's not a lot to go on. (Btw, can't thank you enough)
Lets see, this is what it says about the 21.5.
"The 2C-T-21.5 and 2C-T-22 already theoretically proposed by shulgin were finally tested in humans. 2C-T-21.5 (142; 12-30mg 8 -14 h) proved to be only slightly less potent compared to 2C-T-21 (141) coupled with classic psychedelic components. 2C-T-22 has not yet been sufficiently tested (first signs of effects at 5+5+6 mg)"
So I have very little idea of what to expect as I've never tried 2C-T-21. I just hope** it is 2C-T-2 like but we'll see.
Maybe I should just settle for 2C-D, and perhaps revisit 2C-T
Can't go wrong with 2C-D imo. Never tried 2C-T but i think you were mentioning some inconsistency with it? That's the only thing that worries me about any of the 2C-T's really, the strange metabolisms and unknown mechanisms (as I plan on taking some novel difluoroethylthio thing lmao

yes Mr EMT i took too much of something that is mentioned in one book and it's in german lol). At least there is a wiki page on it though.