• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: tryptakid | Foreigner

⫸Trans and LGBTQIA+ Discussion⫷

Status
Not open for further replies.
AE304699-A4-C5-4-C7-D-B350-15-B3-A17202-A4.jpg

This is absolutely true of American liberals, they would put a piece shit in their twitter bio
that's ironic coming from a guy who defends a grifter that said "if i went out onto 5th ave and shot a guy (something something people would still fellate me with one thumb up my pooper, or something to that effect)" and it was one of the two truthful things he said (the other being the one about how mike pence wants to hang gay ppl).

there are ppl on both extremes of the one- dimensional american political 'spectrum' that lick of the boot.
 
that's ironic coming from a guy who defends a grifter that said "if i went out onto 5th ave and shot a guy (something something people would still fellate me with one thumb up my pooper, or something to that effect)" and it was one of the two truthful things he said (the other being the one about how mike pence wants to hang gay ppl).

there are ppl on both extremes of the one- dimensional american political 'spectrum' that lick of the boot.
This includes the folx that give their children experimental pharmaceutical products to not be cast out by their little social group and be accepted imo
 
you liar, you know i am positive i did the right thing for my kids (based upon my countless posts in the covid thread)

and i would never do shit for conformity, especially if it were to put my kids in danger. i actually love my kids, unlike the child abusers that refuse to get their kids the routine vaccinations.

you just probably believe your own lies even though they contradict reality. it's sad to see it. you make believe that you have a single original opinion, and can't help but dump ad hominems around every corner because of the cogitive dissonance.

@Dropperneck
 
you liar, you know i am positive i did the right thing for my kids (based upon my countless posts in the covid thread)

and i would never do shit for conformity, especially if it were to put my kids in danger. i actually love my kids, unlike the child abusers that refuse to get their kids the routine vaccinations.

you just probably believe your own lies even though they contradict reality. it's sad to see it. you make believe that you have a single original opinion, and can't help but dump ad hominems around every corner because of the cogitive dissonance.

@Dropperneck
Daily reminder that ‘trusting the science’ was propaganda. Being accepted by the establishment and supporting the current thing is important to you. Just be honest, bc all of the science said the children got zero benefit and only the risks of an poorly tested experimental pharmaceutical product.
 
trusting the scienc
again with the lies. ya don't "trust" the "science"

you understand that science is a process, and you lean as much as you can about the topic at hand. and you learn to think/ read critically instead of just blindly trusting randos on twitter, facebook, etc.

bc all of the science said the children got zero benefit and only the risks
i challenge you to present your source... IN THE COVID THREAD. just tag me, please.

my prediction? you'll pull a lvg and just spew out another ad hominem and an excuse that blames me for your inability to demonstrate the validity of your claim.
 
again with the lies. ya don't "trust" the "science"

you understand that science is a process, and you lean as much as you can about the topic at hand. and you learn to think/ read critically instead of just blindly trusting randos on twitter, facebook, etc.


i challenge you to present your source... IN THE COVID THREAD. just tag me, please.

my prediction? you'll pull a lvg and just spew out another ad hominem and an excuse that blames me for your inability to demonstrate the validity of your claim.


pFpAMvN.png
 
damn, that was a super fucking quick demonstration of my prediction's accuracy. kudos.

seriously, i'm laughing my ass off at how fucking on- point i was. fuuuuck... spooky.
 
Last edited:
again with the lies. ya don't "trust" the "science"

you understand that science is a process, and you lean as much as you can about the topic at hand. and you learn to think/ read critically instead of just blindly trusting randos on twitter, facebook, etc

If you actually did that, then you would know there is no long-term data on how gender transition affects childhood development.

They literally don't know.

So giving kids Lupron and hormones after a cursory investigation into their so-called gender dysphoria has no scientific backing proving that it is safe, efficacious, or healthy long-term. That's because prior to the recent craze, gender dysphoria as a diagnosis and gender reassignment as an intervention were largely only done on adults. Like 98% of the time.

I'm not making this up. There is literally no data. The only thing close is a study that Sweden did on like 30 kids back in the early 2000s, and in that study they still said the findings were inconclusive.

It's mind-boggling that so many children are undergoing these medical interventions when we don't know but it's going to do to them for the rest of their lives.

How do I know this? Because I actually read science. I read science regardless if I agree or disagree with it. I read it because I want to know wtf is going on.

I am against transitioning children or blocking their puberty because of the lack of science. And before you start saying there are psychology studies, let me save you the time by informing you that psychology is not a hard science and is not the foundation of modern medicine.
 
If you actually did that, then you would know there is no long-term data on how gender transition affects childhood development.

They literally don't know.

So giving kids Lupron and hormones after a cursory investigation into their so-called gender dysphoria has no scientific backing proving that it is safe, efficacious, or healthy long-term. That's because prior to the recent craze, gender dysphoria as a diagnosis and gender reassignment as an intervention were largely only done on adults. Like 98% of the time.

I'm not making this up. There is literally no data. The only thing close is a study that Sweden did on like 30 kids back in the early 2000s, and in that study they still said the findings were inconclusive.

It's mind-boggling that so many children are undergoing these medical interventions when we don't know but it's going to do to them for the rest of their lives.

How do I know this? Because I actually read science. I read science regardless if I agree or disagree with it. I read it because I want to know wtf is going on.

I am against transitioning children or blocking their puberty because of the lack of science. And before you start saying there are psychology studies, let me save you the time by informing you that psychology is not a hard science and is not the foundation of modern medicine.
It’s the same play they did with the mRNA jabs. Just repeat propaganda that it’s safe and effective till it comes true.
Messing with the endocrine system of anyone, but especially developing children, is going to have major long term health consequences. Don’t need to feed someone’s Credentialism fetish to figure that one out. Shit blows my mind
 
It’s the same play they did with the mRNA jabs. Just repeat propaganda that it’s safe and effective till it comes true.
Messing with the endocrine system of anyone, but especially developing children, is going to have major long term health consequences. Don’t need to feed someone’s Credentialism fetish to figure that one out. Shit blows my mind

They're creating major long-term customers out of these children. Once they become adults they will likely have myriad physical and mental health issues. All while pushing an ideology that accelerates neoliberalism and the erosion of freedom of information.
 
Last edited:
more of the fallacious rhetoric... your whole comment is a response to an apparent strawman or apparition.

if you actually could argue in good faith, the world would be a slightly better place.

I was literally responding to YOUR statement: "you understand that science is a process, and you lean as much as you can about the topic at hand. and you learn to think/ read critically instead of just blindly trusting randos on twitter, facebook, etc"

In other words, you're positioning yourself as in-the-know while making your opponents seem like know-nothings who only get their info from social media.

I was responding to your CLEAR lack of knowledge about the current status of scientific research on this issue.

And what do you do? Turn around and dismiss me for the second time, as if I said nothing at all.

You're absolutely gone. There's no getting through to you. It's just pure ideology driving you. You've demonstrated in this thread over and over that all you know how to do is spout propaganda while completely dismissing any rational evidence.

You're completely lost.
 
I was just about to post this. Not saying all trans people behave this way. What is most concerning is that you posted and nobody even acknowledged it or responded. If it was any other state rep. everyone would have been in a fervor to condemn whatever party they belonged to but trans person, forget it. Nobody wants to even touch it.
 
just seemed unnecessary to include what type of sex it was depicting... unless you think there is something inherently wrong with homosexuality?
If you want to reproduce the human species then it would be the wrong way to do that.
How do homosexuals replicate?

And again you are all complicit in grooming if you have no problem with this happening.


^ Right wingers thinking there is something wrong with being gay? Perish the thought
Not a right-winger but I would expect that type of deceptive political rhetoric from a communist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top