• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: tryptakid | Foreigner

Russo-Ukrainian War v. World War 3?

Oblivious yes. Don't matter where I hear it the point is older genx went through the nuclear cold war Era. Learning about iodine in elementary school etc..
I think that's why so many are so worried about it. I've noticed Americans have more fear then Canadians when it comes to nuclear war.
 
Jennn said:
Oblivious yes. Don't matter where I hear it the point is older genx went through the nuclear cold war Era. Learning about iodine in elementary school etc..
I think that's why so many are so worried about it. I've noticed Americans have more fear then Canadians when it comes to nuclear war.
Click to expand...



we had fallout shelter signs hanging in all the schools - but nobody really knew what those signs meant


but yea we learned about nuclear energy because we were smarter than the following generations
 
Electrum1 said:
Mini nukes existed a long time ago, so there are likely even better ones now. They didn't make a giant explosion like large ones, so they could definitely be used without starting a giant nuclear war imo

Click to expand...

They prolly have RPNs by now…Rocket Propelled Nuke, take out an entire enemy installation from 200meters away
 
Because we don't when its going to happen. Just that it will. First the dam will be blown up, sometime later myoklaiv gets nuked and the third world breaks out with NATO, australia new zealand, japan, south korea and irasel VS russia, china, north korea, iran and syria.
 
Mr. Krinkle said:
we had fallout shelter signs hanging in all the schools - but nobody really knew what those signs meant


but yea we learned about nuclear energy because we were smarter than the following generations
Click to expand...
You were not taught nuclear energy you were taught nuclear war. Falling for the cold war propaganda isn't what I consider smart.
 
Electrum1 said:
Mini nukes existed a long time ago, so there are likely even better ones now. They didn't make a giant explosion like large ones, so they could definitely be used without starting a giant nuclear war imo
Click to expand...
After all nuclear testing went underground the public has no idea what has been developed. The smallest known nuke, the one in that video, goes down to 10 tons of TNT which is still massive. That was 60 years ago.

I think at some point they overcame the technical hurdles and managed to drop the yields much lower, allowing for highly portable small munitions that still retain the difference between nuclear vs chemical explosives i.e the ability to completely dissociate material in the fireball/x-ray absorption area, but also eliminating the radiation produced through use of different materials/construction. Crucially they allow a single person to carry and plant devices that would otherwise require truck loads of chemical explosives to match the yield. e.g. the Bali bombing (this and other events have signatures that don't match ordinary explosions).

This is what 50 tons of TNT looks like:
 
Last edited:
I am not sure how liberals can support the establishment and their endless wars. The US has already blown up a pipeline, I’m guessing a nuclear false flag in next, to move this from a proxy war to a full on conflict. It would give them the justification to go into Russia and install a puppet western government, like they did in 2014 in Ukraine. My only question is who’s gonna fight this war, even many zoomers are hip to the evil ass establishments ways. And all the woke people that support war aren’t gonna be fighting shit. Interesting to think about imo
 
I know 5th graders are not taught nuclear physics.
You just seem to want to argue with me.
Get a better hobby.
 
no you're just wrong and won't admit it and you keep going on like you're right - but you're not


so we went over nuclear fission and fusion but not into great depth about it - but i clearly remember to need to know the difference between the 2 from a test i took


education.nationalgeographic.org

Making Sense of Nuclear Energy

Watch this brief, video picture of practice that captures everyday classroom life and provides real-life examples of how students learn and think about energy topics.
education.nationalgeographic.org education.nationalgeographic.org


and if you look there ^ you will see a video of 4th and 5th graders in San Diego (that's in the USA) learning about nuclear energy


so you're wrong


:)
 
Mr. Krinkle said:
no you're just wrong and won't admit it and you keep going on like you're right - but you're not


so we went over nuclear fission and fusion but not into great depth about it - but i clearly remember to need to know the difference between the 2 from a test i took


education.nationalgeographic.org

Making Sense of Nuclear Energy

Watch this brief, video picture of practice that captures everyday classroom life and provides real-life examples of how students learn and think about energy topics.
education.nationalgeographic.org education.nationalgeographic.org


and if you look there ^ you will see a video of 4th and 5th graders in San Diego (that's in the USA) learning about nuclear energy


so you're wrong


:)
Click to expand...
How am I wrong in my opinion? I said gen x had the cold war to deal with.
You kept the bs up. Ohh it was millennials. When I pointed out the difference in countries you said you learn nuclear physics in grade 5.
A quick Google search in your government says physics is introduced in high school.

You just want to argue and be right when you're not.
Canadians didn't learn about nuclear war drills, Americans did so how was I wrong?

Forget about it and just fuck off
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top