Spoken like a true disciple. Mask be upon you, brother!if anything it says to me that the immune system of a vaccinated person kicks in faster because it already familiar with the virus. but whatever I'm no expert but neither is anyone on here it seems.
yeah maybe try harder or go to some electric universe lumatic forumSpoken like a true disciple. Mask be upon you, brother!
![]()
Bruh, your suppose to remove the Schwag seeds before you smoke , all them popping seeds going to brainyeah maybe try harder or go to some electric universe lumatic forum
I have to admit that this whole mess has made me somewhat skeptical of these scientists who are appointed to political roles. I'm not saying I don't value science and facts, but the politics side of things always seems to take precedence over everything.
We we're told a lot of things that ended up not being true. They admit that. I get people get shit wrong, but it seems like in retrospect that maybe they were telling us things to make us feel better. Make us think they had a strategy when really we were just fucked.
The vaccines were advertised as a way to keep from getting sick. That was either a lie or a disastrous miscalculation. Then they said if you have all the shots you'll get less sick than everyone else. Well from my own experience that hasn't been true. I got much sicker than my 60 year old overweight neighbor who smokes like a chimney. He barely even knew he had it , and never got a jab. Meanwhile I've been sick for going on a week, coughing up blood, buckets of phlegm, fatigue, coughing fits, dizziness, etc.
also, those single file lines in grocery store aisles... germs linger in the air, so it doesn't matter if we are six feet apart if I'm just going to walk through the germ cloud the person in front of me leaves behind.
meh.
yeah maybe try harder or go to some electric universe lumatic forum
The whole thing was an exercise in political science. Fauci literally became the science. One man. In the UK they spent a million or something on this blue propaganda room for Bojo and his doom twins to get up and bombard the public with powerpoint slides every week, which served no other purpose except to try and terrify people. The news was no better.. constant updates on the figures for cases but never actually doing their journalistic duty and asking what constitutes a fucking case.I have to admit that this whole mess has made me somewhat sceptical of these scientists who are appointed to political roles. I'm not saying I don't value science and facts, but the politics side of things always seems to take precedence over everything.
We we're told a lot of things that ended up not being true. They admit that. I get people get shit wrong, but it seems like in retrospect that maybe they were telling us things to make us feel better. Make us think they had a strategy when really we were just fucked.
No lockdowns here, there haven't been for a long time nowEurope is still having lockdowns? That sucks.Things feel normal around here (eastern US)
I got much sicker than my 60 year old overweight neighbor who smokes like a chimney
indeed.
and, as you note - and unlike faith - science can admit it's wrong
alasdair
the problem is science keeps getting abused for political reasons and bad theories subsequently are allowed to crowd out good theories.
But science does not live in isolation from political forces. This is what science has become, what science is in the 20th century. It is not the idealized image of the maverick discoverer of the Victorian era, it just doesn't function like that at all any more. Science became institutionalized, and scientists rely on their institutions, and funding, in order to function. That financial pressure on individual careers and whole institutions is political because whoever controls the money controls them. The journal system functions in the same way, thanks to Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine's father).yeah, i tend to agree. but that's more a problem with politics than science itself.
Moderna sued Pfizer and its German partner BioNTech on Friday, alleging that the rival firms improperly used its foundational technology in developing their coronavirus vaccine
Pfizer’s COVID-19 pill appears to provide little or no benefit for adults under 65
the LA Times is one of those sites that blocks you from reading with a subscrption pop-up, but in firefox, if you click the toggle reader view (ctrl+alt+R) you can read the whole thing - same with theepochtimes
Cough -- Bypass Paywalls by Adam for Firefox and Chrome -- cough...
plus ca change![]()
Pfizer COVID pill showed no benefit in adults under 65, study finds
Paxlovid, Pfizer’s COVID-19 pill, appears to provide little or no benefit for adults 40 to 65, according to a new study.www.latimes.com