No, I got what you were conveying, and I was agreeing with the thesis that there are some major biochemical differences between sexes. These physiological factors are important, and to ignore this would be foolish and fundamentally wrong. Furthermore I’m not uncomfortable discussing these topics at all. Please don’t conflate what I’m saying with snowflake politics. I guess I’m just reiterating the point that it seems like you’re jumping to some conclusions, but what do I know?
I’m reminded of the medical issue / ethics dilemma regarding the fact that pain is a self-reported phenomenon and malingering is a real thing. Entactogenic qualitative effects are complex and personal, like pain. Moreover, it’s not clear to me whether you were saying men rolled harder bc of the oxytocin thing, or if women do bc of the blood serum levels thing. I don’t think that can be determined in any linear manner like we’re attempting to do maybe![]()
My apologies my frustration regarding the silencing of these topics is more general, you are discussing instead of becoming emotional which I appreciate.
I guess I’m saying women are hit harder mg/mg but men get more positive effects overall. I think one reason among a few would be oxytocin sensitivity of males vs females but now that I know the tidbit regarding increased HMMA formation in women I’m sure that influences things too.
Women have substantially higher blood levels mg/mg, then if we see higher HMMA formation it’s clear neurotoxicity is much more a danger for women then men. This could also confuse research results as I’m sure MDMA naive women respond much better then ones with a fair amount of MDMA use history.
Your right though, this sort of soft science is subjective AF. Probably why research surrounding these topics often varies a lot too.
-GC