Based on what? How do you untangle the exponential increase in the number of reported cases and separate which ones are a result of people being made aware of VAERS and being encouraged to report anything from ones which might be legitimately caused by the vaccines.
If you know anything about VAERS and the nature of vaccine reporting, you'd know that adverse events are worryingly under-reported. Doctors are not encouraged to report truthfully about vaccines, they're much more likely to dismiss any link between an event and a vaccine, especially as more time elapses between the injection and the injury.
At this point in the game NO-ONE should be dropping references to uncited papers they associate with authoritative bodies.
AND —-GOTCHA
Your possibly very sneaky use of “Harvard” here does not relate to the University. It relates to “Harvard Pilgrim Inc” which is a for-profit healthcare company.
There was not a peer-reviewed academic paper. There was a government-funded project report. Relating to vaccinations/VAERS prior to 20010. So well before VAERS became a household name.
And the goal of the report was to justify increased State surveillance of people’s medical records as held by HMO’s etc.
AFAIK the report was funded by the Department of Health and Human Services. The researchers from Harvard analyzed and reworked their private healthcare system and found that vaccine injuries were MUCH higher than the BS "one in a million" mantra that the authorities (and everyone else) repeats constantly. When those researchers approached the CDC offering to do the same with the national database - they didn't even return their calls or emails. There are many examples of the governmental health bodies not actually being interested in developing a thorough and comprehensive vaccine injury reporting system. The reason why is because just like the Harvard Pilgrim study, they'd find that vaccine injuries are much more common and prevalent than the public have been led to believe and this obviously would threaten their profits.
Nobody on the pro-vax side says it should be used that way. It is an early warning system intended to indicate potential areas for further research. But it is not the only such system or starting point for research.
If it's not the only one then it's the most comprehensive and it's severely lacking, especially considering that we're injecting these vaccines into almost every baby in the country.
Similar to how the government could do a thorough and comprehensive
vaccinated vs unvaccinated statistical comparative study yet they refuse to. The biggest one that I saw (roughly 700 kids) showed that the unvaccinated group possessed much better overall health than the vaccinated group. I'm not surprised by that and I'm sure someone like yourself would try and pick apart the study or find some "gotcha" to dismiss it. But then the question remains, why doesn't the government do the same thing on a national scale? It's because they would find out that unvaccinated people are overall much healthier and suffer from less medical conditions than vaccinated people. Which obviously destroys the entire justification behind the trillion-dollar producing vaccine schedule.
If you want to simply argue “we do know the full extent of vaccine injuries and they may be greater than people realise” most reasonable people would agree. I would. But you and others are inferring that true knowledge of serious and/or fatal injuries is obscured by a factor of 100 or more. That seems less credible and very speculative.
Well I don't know if most people are reasonable so most people get triggered and shut off whenever you even begin to question the ethics behind the vaccine schedule and the lack of safety testing and injury tracking. But that factor of <1% was a report by the HHS and Harvard University. So it's not like this is some randomly speculative number pulled out of the rabbit hole by conspiracy poofters. I did hear that that specific finding was related to the HPV vaccine, but McCullough gives a more specific estimation based on the covid vaccines and he stated 4-5x under-reported. Even the official figures of 20K aren't causing the alarm that it should. The goal should be saving lives, not stopping a virus. If the attempt to save lives ends up killing more people (and especially younger people) than the virus does, then shouldn't we reexamine what we're doing and perhaps consider alternatives or halting the program? Has that ever even been discussed? How many vax deaths would we need to see before that should happen?
What data proves there are 20,000 vaccine deaths? You drop that like it is self-evident fact that everyone agrees with.
That's VAERS bro. That's the accepted, official government statistic for deaths following covid vaccines. I wonder what the true number is.
I agree that the hard evidence for the value of lockdowns, masks, social distancing etc etc is lacking
This right here should discredit and invalidate the entire covid-policy push by governments (strangely all national govts mostly following suit in lock step together).
The changes to our world and societies have been monumental and have severely negatively affected a staggering number of people. So shouldn't there have been the most watertight evidence presented to justify everything that's happened over the past 2 years? I mean simply the globally-coordinated programming mantra of "it's just 15 days to flatten the curve" turned out to be ridiculously inaccurate - so why are people still listening to and trusting the organisations that have blatantly lied and shifted the goalposts in order to increase and maintain the direct power they have over every individual person? How come the average person has no idea that the original computer model projections for how many people would die globally if we didn't lock down, were done by Ferguson at Imperial who was proven to be a fraud with completely dodgy data that vastly overestimated death counts? Not to mention he broke his own covid rules by secretly traveling to fuck his mistress. Funny how politicians don't seem to care to follow the same rules that they inflict on everyone else. I thought they were serious about this pandemic and what they believe would stop the spread and save the world? People need to wake the fuck up already.
www.americaoutloud.com
conejoguardian.org
openvaers.com
rumble.com
