• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: Xorkoth | Madness

Why Christianity is a false religion

What is a demon? A demon is a fallen angel.
Fantasy characters can have many names. Who cares, as they are just there to represent evil, or whatever character trait is at issue.

In a dualistic world, all entities have good and evil sides.

We are perfect in that way. Evolution demands it.

The point is that Yahweh belongs in the evil camp.

Regards
DL
 
Ooor, maybe satan is actually right.

I find it amazing how almost noone seems to ever wonder, what if god does exist, and the bible is generally true..... but the fallen angels were right, that this god is not worthy of our worship.

Then they would be showing a good moral sense and would likely be Gnostic Christians who have known that for 2,000 years.

Regards
DL
 
Yeah you can call it that as well

Or elevated if Satan is the Loyal Opposition that she was originally thought to be.

She trained Adam.

She trained the second Adam, Jesus, if you believe that weird part of the myth.

That makes her the real hero of the god wars and not Jesus.

It seems that Christianity was meant to be a matriarchal Goddess worshiping cult that got corrupted.

Given that Chrestianity was involved with, and being a good man religion, Goddess over god would show the ideal of men fighting to protect their Goddesses and queens.

Rather a naturalistic religion and the best of Christianity, before it went to stupid with the literal reading of myths.

Regards
DL
 
So the bottom line was that he saw the fundamental spiritual or religious equality of man and women and heterosexuals and homosexuals as existing within a social construct that overall added to the common good.
I agree.

A shame right wing Christians and Muslims do not.

Both religions and more unmanly religions put women low, and have men too stupid to recognize that now they have to go low to be equal to both parents.

How low would you let a religion push your wife or daughter?

I like the law of the sea. Captain Coward Club members do not.

Regards
DL
 
It is worth recognising that it was Christianity, largely through the work of Paul, that first bestowed full personhood on everybody in Roman-influenced society. Prior to Paul's interpretation of the new covenant brought by Jesus wives, children and slaves were all property of the pater familias (head of the household) under Roman law. A Husband/Father literally held the power of life and death over all members of his household. So to state that Christianity is essentially patriarchal is not strictly correct if one takes into consideration just how fundamentally altering was its message of equality. In the first century, as part of a festival honoring his own godhead, the Emperor Nero compelled all women in Rome, high born and low, to work as prostitutes for male citizens, free men and slaves without any right of refusal. Christians abhorred that licentiousness and were killed en masse trying to protect the dignity of all women, not just their own. St Paul , really one of the fathers of mainstream Christianity in both the Latin and Eastern traditions, was one likely martyred at this time for his defence of women.

However, while these first century Christians were very courageous, there is a substantive criticism of Christianity running from St Paul to the present, in that it has never fully resolved the line of demarcation between the civil and religious realms. When in a misogynistic civil context, it has tended to let civil culture set the standard for gender roles based on its earliest Judaic traditions. But it has done so in the belief that monogamous marriages best respect the personhood of both men and women allowing neither to be the chattel of the other or be used in a chattel or transactional like manner.
 
..or rather the Christianity of the time had no influence on Judaism and neither did the Romans. That's another way to put it. As for Jesus, his place in Christianity is unquestionable but once you break down the religion itself his position doesn't hold much ground. Humans aren't perfect and being a son of God is pretty much foreign to Jewish thinking anyway. At best Christianity is a quaint, anti-Semitic religion that teaches values while opposing everyone else's. There's nothing healthy about it for sure
 
..or rather the Christianity of the time had no influence on Judaism and neither did the Romans. That's another way to put it. As for Jesus, his place in Christianity is unquestionable but once you break down the religion itself his position doesn't hold much ground. Humans aren't perfect and being a son of God is pretty much foreign to Jewish thinking anyway. At best Christianity is a quaint, anti-Semitic religion that teaches values while opposing everyone else's. There's nothing healthy about it for sure
Apart from the thousands of Jews who became Christians. I'd say that was an influence. I'm not particularly expert on Judaism but it is not an entirely homogenous religion either. There are numerous sects and schools of thought as in all other religions (except perhaps ironically Roman Catholicism where dogma and doctrine derive from a central authority).
 
Roman Catholicism where dogma and doctrine derive from a central authority).

If central authority had not been created, to stop all the wars between sects, the E.U today would be a part of a Caliphate. The holy war was a way to both unite Christians but also regain much of the lost territory and push the Muslims back.

Unfortunately, central authority is great for a nations protection, but it has little to do with decent moral codes, and that is where Christianity and Islam fail.

Need I repeat why?

Regards
DL
 
Islam does not have a central religious authority. There is as much disagreement within Islam about doctrinal matters and dogma as there is within Christianity.
 
Islam does not have a central religious authority.
Correct.

They have many venues of attack against the Kafir.

Their Jihads are not as dramatic as inquisitions, but there are more of them.

What else can one expect from fascist religions that venerate genocide, homophobia and misogyny?

Regards
DL
 
There is as much disagreement within Islam about doctrinal matters and dogma as there is within Christianity.
Correct.

Both religions are still fragmented, showing how unworthy their ideology is.

They both have a reasonable left wing, with it's lunatic fringe, and both have that right win lunatic fringe.

Thank god the right is shrinking, thanks to us educating our children away from foolish supernatural thinking.

The left has to grow by burning the bible.

Regards
DL
 
Correct.

They have many venues of attack against the Kafir.

Their Jihads are not as dramatic as inquisitions, but there are more of them.

What else can one expect from fascist religions that venerate genocide, homophobia and misogyny?

Regards
DL

I think the theocratic Islamic states like Iran and Saudi Arabia are very much like Catholic states during the Middle-ages and then the Inquisition. In both cases you had temporal powers working with religious authorities to produce a hegemony that suited and maintained the authority of both. Even when the temporal powers are/were clearly great sinners themselves by any measure.
 
Christianity is not a false religion, it is the only true religion, salvation through Christ.

For God so loved the Earth, that he gave his only begotten son so that whosoever believeth in him shall have everlasting life and perish.
 
Apart from the thousands of Jews who became Christians. I'd say that was an influence. I'm not particularly expert on Judaism but it is not an entirely homogenous religion either. There are numerous sects and schools of thought as in all other religions (except perhaps ironically Roman Catholicism where dogma and doctrine derive from a central authority).
As you say we don't know the full history or how many people became Christian (who's to say it was thousands, for example?). It's also good to keep in mind that early Christianity would've been vastly different from the Christianity we think of today. It's thought or maybe even known that it was first thought of as a sect of Judaism. I'm sure you know this but it seems like a good idea to keep these things in context
 
do you have any evidence ?
As we learn from the story of St Thomas (the doubter), faith is one of the cardinal virtues.

Separate from religion, it’s probably important for us to have some things in our lives that are not always amenable to reason. And I’m not talking about ex-wives or lovers here.
 
Separate from religion, it’s probably important for us to have some things in our lives that are not always amenable to reason.
Agreed. I'm not a true Taoist but do align with it. It doesn't ask for faith per se but does ask you to trust in something we can never truly understand or even name for that matter. I suppose this is ultimately the same thing.
 
Agreed. I'm not a true Taoist but do align with it. It doesn't ask for faith per se but does ask you to trust in something we can never truly understand or even name for that matter. I suppose this is ultimately the same thing.
I sometimes think that it is part of human nature to yearn for that thing beyond our comprehension. It’s like we need something far bigger than what our own minds can handle.
 
It's kinda bs, only thing Thomas did wrong was not immediately believing in the resurrection.

He was also the one who encouraged the others to return with Jesus to Judea after the death of Lazarus.

Alas life's not fair, you make one small mistake after showing bravery and loyalty and your name is used to call people a doubting Thomas the next 2000 years.
 
If someone comes up with something so specific, I think it's okay to ask for evidence. You tell me God sent Jesus to die for my sins and I have to believe in him or spend eternity in hell, I think the only reasonable response is "How do you know?"
 
Top