• S E X
    L O V E +
    R E L A T I O N S H I P S


    ❤️ Welcome Guest! ❤️


    Posting Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • SLR Moderators: Senior Staff

Agenda behind porn?

Markomarkh said:
Tbh I think theirs no agenda at all now, it’s just supply and demand it’s there, all this religion talk its full of sins and making you guilty-feeling is nonsense. There’s good porn and bad porn. I bet all these years using porn has created safe solo sex and saved me a lot of bother from troublesome wrongen women! Not saying they are all bad, sure there are nice ones to meet. Just have fun and do it in moderation.
Click to expand...

Nazi chic was also very popular in porn both during the 1960s, 1970s and still is today in 2020.
 
PriestTheyCalledHim said:
Actual sexual predators such as paedos and rapists if they can abuse someone will do this and porn does not turn people into rapists, paedos, or even serial killers/psychopaths like Ted Bundy claimed.

I have had sex that was better than sex in porn but I have always had an extremely high sex drive. I am not hypersexual or manic but one of my ex's was both and we both had basically the same sex drive.
Click to expand...

My man, I think you've quoted the wrong post. What are you going on about?
 
F.U.B.A.R. said:
Perhaps they just love sex and love getting paid for it even more. It's a no brainer.

I wish I were that hot that people would pay good money to see my cum face... :D
Click to expand...
If you want to do webcam shows someone will pay to watch you wank and you do not even need to show your face as many women and men do not show their faces or will wear masks or hoods.

However, you will have lots of competition from younger adult men who market their cam shows and private clips for sale on fan sites like crazy.

The so called 'private' video clips all wind up being shared on free porn sites and blogs anyway.
 
The agenda is greed.

The product is media designed to arouse. Worthless, yet known to be distracting (and therefore easy to sell), hence why its taboo.

It gradually lowers the quality of social discourse by subverting or replacing more useful media.

And then what have you got? A reactive idiocracy, which is not a sustainable model for a civil society.

Of course, pictures of wee wees, bums & nipples don't singlehandedly destroy an entire civilisation- but consider how much of our media would qualify as designed to arouse rather designed to inform. Is almost all 'pornographic'. Disgusting.
 
Porn pays more for g+b or g+g etc it depends who you work for and your contract. From what i know off-hand, porn is easy but it comes with the price of frequent (monthly) physicals. I also know a lot of porn stars have STDs. Definitely not AIDS like it used to be, but others which i'd personally rather steer away from

I mean i was invited to do porn once, but i wouldn't. That's why. I don't have an STD and want to keep it that way

-G ;)
 
Gormur said:
Porn pays more for g+b or g+g etc it depends who you work for and your contract. From what i know off-hand, porn is easy but it comes with the price of frequent (monthly) physicals. I also know a lot of porn stars have STDs. Definitely not AIDS like it used to be, but others which i'd personally rather steer away from

I mean i was invited to do porn once, but i wouldn't. That's why. I don't have an STD and want to keep it that way

-G ;)
Click to expand...
A lot of gay men in porn do have HIV/AIDS. The numbers are so high it would be more difficult to list the ones who actually are HIV negative than the ones who are HIV+. Other diseases are also very common.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top