Pure stuff not as good?

[scarlet_tunic]

I feel only moderately comfortable discussing this on a public forum, but recently I took a molly that I was told was pure and 'good stuff.' Everyone else that took it seemed to love it. However, it was only 'meh.' I felt a little bit of it, but the rush just wasn't there ... people were telling me this one was actually better because it was pure and not 'laced' with anything. I am wondering, is MDMA really good when it is pure, or does what people put in it make it better in some way? Is the brown stuff better or the white? I have never had this crappy experience of it except maybe a previous time when it had salt in it. But this was purportedly 'really good stuff.' I am not sure why my reaction to it was the way it was. I am worried something in me psychologically made me not enjoy it as much. But Molly was never dependent on my psychology.. if I felt bad, it would always make me feel better no matter what. Hmm ...

I am disappointed with the experience because I always space out my use (every 2 - 3 months) and I was expecting a bang. I didn't drink on it.. I started drinking afterward because it was such crappy stuff that I needed to enhance my buzz (something I NEVER have to do on molly).

it just wasn't there..

 

[Felonious Monk]

If it's not tested in front of you, assume whoever is telling you it's "good stuff" is lying.

White or brown, could be MDMA or could be something entirely different. Color isn't always indicative of purity, it can be a result of precursors or process.

 

[Clocktower]

Before you do anything else, start reagent testing the drugs you take. What other people say is an extremely unreliable way of knowing what you are taking.

 

[jammin83]

might want to slow down in it. let the ol brain recharge. that can take a while.

get where you are coming from though. I always rolled way harder on the pressies than I did the mahl dawg.

 

[scarlet_tunic]

Lol, I am not sure what those are...

Well, it's been about a month and a half since I've done it, and usually that is enough to do it again and still have a really good time. I don't know what reagent testing is but I'm sure I can look it up. It's the brown stuff straight from the rock...

 

[epic11]

I feel only moderately comfortable discussing this on a public forum, but recently I took a molly that I was told was pure and 'good stuff.' Everyone else that took it seemed to love it. However, it was only 'meh.' I felt a little bit of it, but the rush just wasn't there ... people were telling me this one was actually better because it was pure and not 'laced' with anything. I am wondering, is MDMA really good when it is pure, or does what people put in it make it better in some way? Is the brown stuff better or the white? I have never had this crappy experience of it except maybe a previous time when it had salt in it. But this was purportedly 'really good stuff.' I am not sure why my reaction to it was the way it was. I am worried something in me psychologically made me not enjoy it as much. But Molly was never dependent on my psychology.. if I felt bad, it would always make me feel better no matter what. Hmm ...

I am disappointed with the experience because I always space out my use (every 2 - 3 months) and I was expecting a bang. I didn't drink on it.. I started drinking afterward because it was such crappy stuff that I needed to enhance my buzz (something I NEVER have to do on molly).

it just wasn't there..

'

You didnt get mdma, and this is your fault alone for not testing it, or having it tested in front of your eyes. Who knows what you took. We cant speculate. Never trust word of mouth, its never true to what a chemical reaction test is. You need to own this and use it on EVERYTHING that passes you by.

https://dancesafe.org/product/complete-adulterant-screening-kit/

 

[Pretty_Diamonds]

Yeah, unless you test it yourself, how do you know?

Pure molly isn't for everyone though. I've heard people say that it's too chill, too relaxing. Some people like a little speed in their pills so they can dance all night. Meh, each to their own. Everyone isn't going to always LOVE all the same drugs.

 

[ShiaFuckingLaBeouf]

I have had very pure MDMA several times, the last time it was so pure it was almost crystal clear (but it was more like a quartz kind of thingy, quite clouded still, but almost clear). I felt the same kind of thing as you in a way- the purity is what makes it subtler. Because of how pure it is, the high is a lot cleaner and smoother and you feel a lot less like you are on a drug. I found the effects a lot easier to control as well, e.g. I wasn't chatting as much shit as usual, and the stimulant effects were far less forced. I also found the comedown to be barely noticeable, and I was actually able to fall asleep shortly after taking a line. This MDMA was so pure that the psychedelic effects were very strong as well.

Of course I don't have any evidence to prove that extreme purity=more subtletly in the effects of the drug, but it makes sense. Personally I think that using the very pure stuff (84% ish) is better for most occassions because it's a lot smoother and better for sleeping on, plus almost no comedown and it's just so therapeutic in the days and weeks after the roll. But when you really want to have a good time and roll hard as fuck, I'd take some slightly dirtier MDMA. The best crystals I ever had were brown, don't get me wrong they were very pure but not as pure as the white stuff.

No one has really made it clear to me what the differences between colours are- apparantly the colour is meaningless, says nothing about purity or production. But i have heard that brown stuff might be better because it contains sass oil? is that true? a friend told me that if its brown it might have sass oil in it and when it has sass oil it's really good? because i have never rolled as hard as i have on the brown stuff. can someone confirm this to be true or false please?

But anyway to answer your question, purer MDMA is more chill and less insane. I think there is a much cleaner, smoother high but less of a 'wow' factor, and also slightly less of a body high. To elaborate, I think the body high on pure MDMA is somehow better quality, feels better, than dirtier MDMA, but it's less present and harder to notice it's there. On the other hand I've had occassions on dirty MDMA when I've taken a high dose that the body high almost becomes painful because of how strong it is, and how 'cheap' it feels. OVerral though I would have to say that I do prefer the body high I get from less pure MDMA just because it's easier to feel, it's all over, coursing through your body, whereas pure MDMA gives you a purer, more orgasmic sensation but it's deep in your thighs and lower back, harder to feel elsewhere. perhaps this is my personal experience only, can anyone relate?