Does anyone prefer BK-MDMA to MDMA/MDA?

[dimensiontripping]

I started doing MDMA/MDA, pressed pills back in 09 and it was great. Probably did it 20 times with near pure mdma (tested from legit sources) and it went from great with amazing empathogenic effects to just getting high and losing the magic.

For me, Methylone is so much more manageable, enjoyable, less comedown, great empathy that I can't get with MDMA alone and easy to redose. Its important to note that I only do it by plugging doses betweewn 75-125mg which is plenty. This gives me a great high for 90-120 minutes and redosing up to 3-4 times gives good results. It also does not turn me into a puddle of physical/mental goo on a couch which I find a turn off from MDMA/MDA. Its like when I get to that state on MDMA/MDA its not that productive and all I can do is enjoy touching and spacing out with nystagamus and pleasurable jaw clenching - not worth the physical tax it brings for days after. But I found that this never happens with methylone. Most of my close friends tend to agree as well.

I know methylone gets a bad rap because its being distributed falsely as MDMA but I am able to source clean versions of each. There is a lot of negative connotations about Bk-MDMA out there but I want to hear from other BL'ers if they feel that they brefer the BK to MDMA. Whats your opinion on the two? It seems I have built a semi-permanent tolerance with MDMA and just cant get the magic back even with 2+ years breaks. I have dosed MDMA about 25-35 times over the course of 3 years in 09-12 for context.

 

[Deleted member 337748]

I started doing MDMA/MDA, pressed pills back in 09 and it was great. Probably did it 20 times with near pure mdma (tested from legit sources) and it went from great with amazing empathogenic effects to just getting high and losing the magic.

For me, Methylone is so much more manageable, enjoyable, less comedown, great empathy that I can't get with MDMA alone and easy to redose. Its important to note that I only do it by plugging doses betweewn 75-125mg which is plenty. This gives me a great high for 90-120 minutes and redosing up to 3-4 times gives good results. It also does not turn me into a puddle of physical/mental goo on a couch which I find a turn off from MDMA/MDA. Its like when I get to that state on MDMA/MDA its not that productive and all I can do is enjoy touching and spacing out with nystagamus and pleasurable jaw clenching - not worth the physical tax it brings for days after. But I found that this never happens with methylone. Most of my close friends tend to agree as well.

I know methylone gets a bad rap because its being distributed falsely as MDMA but I am able to source clean versions of each. There is a lot of negative connotations about Bk-MDMA out there but I want to hear from other BL'ers if they feel that they brefer the BK to MDMA. Whats your opinion on the two? It seems I have built a semi-permanent tolerance with MDMA and just cant get the magic back even with 2+ years breaks. I have dosed MDMA about 25-35 times over the course of 3 years in 09-12 for context.

I do understand your reason for your preference, but i highly prefer real mdma/mda over bk any day. Bk is like a very short tease version of mdma to me and i hate being teased.

Bk also gives me stronger urges to abuse because the roll is to short-lived for what i want.

 

[Twigs]

I too prefer methylone over MDMA. I pretty much use it as you would cocaine, where I do a line every 30 to 60 min. Compared to MDMA it is much more functional and discrete as long as you don't go overboard on the dosages.

 

[BlueBull]

Not really. It wasn't bad, enhanced socializing but still completely lucid and also the fact that you didn't even notice you took something after you came down (as long as you didn't exaggerate) was nice. It's a nice chemical in its own right, I've had one or two really fun nights with it, but it can't hold a candle to MDMA for me

 

[Dresden]

I'm sure a lot of people prefer one to the other, depending on which one they tried first and what they're looking for from the experience. I much prefer MDMA with maybe a pinch or two of meth thrown in. I'm sure a lot of people prefer methylone because it's more addictive, but that's why I throw in the Tina. I don't wanna feel lethargic when I need to be dancing hard to get the best, most euphoric effects from the roll. If you're just going to lie around the house, then methylone might seem comparable mainly because you aren't doing the MD right. Exercise! (And I normally never do that.)

 

[Clocktower]

Depends on the situation. If you'd like to roll for a bit but don't want to go wild for the full four hours, BK-MDMA is a great choice.

 

[dimensiontripping]

I'm sure a lot of people prefer one to the other, depending on which one they tried first and what they're looking for from the experience. I much prefer MDMA with maybe a pinch or two of meth thrown in. I'm sure a lot of people prefer methylone because it's more addictive, but that's why I throw in the Tina. I don't wanna feel lethargic when I need to be dancing hard to get the best, most euphoric effects from the roll. If you're just going to lie around the house, then methylone might seem comparable mainly because you aren't doing the MD right. Exercise! (And I normally never do that.)

I have never added meth to my rolls. Does the duration of the meth go beyond the roll in a bad way? That would be my only reason not to is if the drug timelines did not match up. I always add 4-fa to MDMA these days but 4-fa peaks fast and drops fast and isnt that stimulating. Thinking about d-amp too. I love MDMA too but its so sedating, kind of boring. I havent taken pills in 5 years either only pure MDMA/MDA.

 

[FuckWithRaw]

Personally I don't enjoy any cathitones any where near as much as MDMA or MDA. To me they feel eerily similar to a md come up minus the actual rolling part.

I know methylone gets a bad rap because its being distributed falsely as MDMA but I am able to source clean versions of each.

I'm always curious when people say they can source methylone if they use the full range of test kits or GCMS to distinguish between it and say ethylone,butylone, etc...

 

[Dresden]

dimensiontripping,

The duration of the meth does indeed go longer than the duration of the roll but not, I would say, in a bad way. The addition makes the roll much more energetic and less boring.

 

[SmokingAces]

There are definitely a lot of people who prefer mephedrone/4-MMC to MDMA. However as BlueBull says it probably depends which one they tried first, their background and what they're looking for.

Personally the MDMA when I started taking it back 03/04 I much preferred to the pre ban mephedrone or methylone that came about in 08. I've used significant amounts of all 3 of those drugs, MDMA is no longer what it was IMO since they started using PMK-glycidate (an analogue precursor which unlike PMK itself is not derived from safrole in any way). However given the current state of MDMA I can see why the new users prefer methylone or mephedrone, if you never started MDMA until after the big drought then it would seem a little shit.

 

[terarc]

MDMA is a 'better' drug IMO, more useful, more powerful, more inspiring. But I do actually think Methylone is more suited to the kind of thing people use MDMA for: enhancing socialisation and enjoyment of music etc at raves and things like that. It's just much much more controllable and casual, and takes almost infinitely less impact on my body and mind. An MDMA experience for me is so ridiculously psychologically powerful that I don't even really understand how people use it so casually. I cannot take MDMA without essentially ending up giving myself some kind of group therapy session with those I'm with, but at a rave those I'm with tend to be e-tard types who just don't seem to be taking it as seriously as me or being as effected as me and ultimately this leads to depression and a nasty comedown that lasts me months, opposed to a similar length afterglow I'd get after a night in with my girlfriend or closest friends on MDMA.