Lanier eliminates many plainclothes drug units to focus on top dealers

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
32,758
Location
babysitting the argument in my head
Lanier eliminates many plainclothes drug units to focus on top dealers



LANIER20071393372271.jpg




By Clarence Williams and Peter Hermann June 12 at 10:07 PM
Citing disappearing open-air drug markets and new ways narcotics are being sold, D.C. Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier says she wants her detectives to concentrate on suppliers and not street-corner busts that have long been a staple of policing across the country.

The strategy shift, outlined at a community meeting Thursday, will eliminate most of the plainclothes operations police have used for decades to target outdoor drug sales, magnets for drive-by shootings and other violence.

Coming at a tense moment in the nation’s relations between police and the public, it could also ease confrontations involving officers not immediately identifiable as law enforcement. It is an admission that some tactics — which were viewed by some critics as heavy-handed even when the crack epidemic sparked record numbers of homicides — no longer make sense amid a decline in fatal shootings and the availability of synthetic narcotics sold over the Internet, through social media and in convenience stores.


“Our main goal is the supply,” Lanier told about three dozen residents at the community forum in Northeast Washington. “We don’t want to focus police efforts on just people who are addicted. We want to be focusing on the people who are bringing the stuff in.” In an interview, she added: “Our criminal environment is changing rapidly. We have to keep up.”

The plan would eliminate District vice squads — each with about 20 detectives and supervisors — and shift higher-level investigations to the centralized Narcotics and Special Investigations Division. Police will continue undercover operations, but as much as possible, Lanier wants police to be identifiable when making arrests.

The changes are resulting in praise from experts pushing for innovation in policing, guarded optimism among activists who have complained about aggressive police tactics and skepticism from the head of the union representing the District’s rank-and-file officers.

Although D.C. police have escaped the controversies and tumult other cities have experienced after the deaths of black men at the hands of law enforcement — such as in Baltimore, Cleveland, New York and Ferguson, Mo. — critics have complained that in the District, plainclothes officers jump from unmarked cars to roust suspected people, innocent and not, on street corners. Lanier has said specialized “jump out” squads have not been used in some time. She has previously said that in some cases, officers are responding to 911 calls or searching for particular suspects. Residents may also see officers from other agencies, she has said.

cont http://www.washingtonpost.com/local...3706fe-10ff-11e5-a0dc-2b6f404ff5cf_story.html
 
Attacking the supply is what federal, state and local cops have been doing for the past 40+ years. That strategy is what's gotten us here.
 
Wonder if this is going to work, hats off for claiming to leave the users/addicts alone, but really supply side.. good lord you have to be joking?
I doubt it will work. The narco departments have been making easy street level busts since the 80s it's all they know how to do institutionally. Can you imagine some of those meathead plain clothes narcos doing the paperwork for a wiretap warrant?
 
Attacking the supply is what federal, state and local cops have been doing for the past 40+ years. That strategy is what's gotten us here.

Well, that - attacking the supply side, especially in terms of major dealer, as opposed to small timers who sell just to support their habit and/or feed their family - is what the government has been saying they're doing since 1915.

That's the rational behind the policies behind the war on drugs more than ever since the '80s, and it couldn't be further from the truth. Cause it's bullshit. Like over 90% of people charged and in prison for drug offenses are nothing even approaching significant dealers or distributers. The VAST majority who are behind bars for "drug crimes" are either users caught for possession or people who used and sell for no other reason to support their own use.

Bunch of bullshit if you ask me. But if things were to begin to change, and the police started to actually do what they say they're doing, actually going after significant supplier and/or distributors, as opposed to users who get caught with drugs on them or caught selling small amounts of drugs (or get caught will small amounts of their drugs in their possession) in order to feed the money on their back, well, I'll be the first to congradulate those behind the shit in policy and practice.

Drug law enforcement is so entrenched in Harry Anslinger's mindset that is the basis for, working theory supporting and ideological dogma behind the war on drugs and prohibition, not to mention the fact that each and every - ALL - police departments in the United Stated are almost entirely dependent on and addicted to the financial and political incentives directly tied to arresting the easiest to catch.

This more or less ensuring their incarceration and more rather than less ensures the seizure of the "suspects" assets, irregardless of guilt or whether their proven innocent. Of course even if they are proven innocent, it's practically impossible to recovery seized assets, unless you're a rich white man that is... well I just can't imaging the pigs doing anything but more of the same: Continuing to arrest and seize the assets of arresties and non-arresties alike, again regardless of any conviction.

I just can't see any of that changing anytime in the foreseeable future or beyond. Such would require something more than a sea change not just in drug law enforcement and police ideology, it would require that they fundamentally change the way they do business - financially speaking and of course how they go about targeting and arresting people.

Of course those who end up bearing the brunt of our corrupt police state's war on drug, their drug law enforcement thugs and police and other criminal "justice" system minions are always those most visible and vulnerable to them: folks who just coincidentally end up being located on the lowest rung of the drug dealer hierarchy, folks who just happen to be people with next to no meaningful opportunities but to make money by selling drug.

These are people who are of course in actuality nothing more than your "typical" user/dealer, just not all lowest of low level dealer. No, these so called dealer and users come from impoverished populations and areas nearly exclusively, people who don't have the luxuries that the vast majority of white dealers and users of the same status have based on nothing more than the color of their skin, the fact most of their transactions take place behind closed doors in their parents' homes and have access to lawyers worth their salt because they're not paid the ridiculous paltry sum considering that even lower middle class families can afford attorney's that actually give a rat's ass, even if just a little bit, about their client, considering mommy and daddy are paying them at least a reasonable fee for their services.

And of course, when I'm talking about the vast, vast majority of people caught up, they're often not even those super low level so called dealers. Just as often they're folks caught with nothing more than an infinitesimally small amount of dope (that if they happened to have light colored skin, dressed moderately preppy-ish looking and were incapable of anything but the "yes sir/no sir" bullshit lingo while they piss themselves, the cops would take their drugs or make them destroy them, give them a warning or "stern-father-figure-talking-to" and send them on their way) or pulled over for some invented traffic violation at which point the officer "smelled marijuana smoke" in the car and ordered them out to search, impound and confiscate it for no legal reason whatsoever (which is all within their right as drug war warriors).

And it's just as bad for folks who have committed no crime at all, not even having been caught with an amount of some "illegal" drug that was so small it could have been for absolutely nothing but personal use, but merely had some kind of drug paraphernalia like a marijuana pipe - even if it was totally unused: that is more than enough to arrest them and auction off their car and any other property with them at the time so far as the cop decided he wanted to label it as connected it to their "drug crime."

Shit, I hope that all made sense. I'm sorry I began to begin ranting their. Shit like this just gets me going and pissed me THE FUCK OFF! Right so I like to imagine (and I would think ya'll would agree with me on this point, not to mention all my other points in this thread). It's all just fucking sick. Too sick. We sure live in a diseased society all right. Just not one caused by the use or consumption of drug.

I better stop myself now before I lose it and stay up all night ranting on and on. I need to get some sleep before I have to get the fuck up in two hours. Peace and love to you all my friends and loved ones. Stay safe; meaning stay away from the fucking pigs.
 
Top