you're of course entitled to your opinion, but did you even read my last post?
a grand jury is a check on the power of a prosecutor. one of the last real checks that we even have to quell prosecutorial overreach.
the prosecutor presents the evidence to the grand jury and they tell him whether he's full of shit or not. without that, the system would become even more fucked up and biased. prosecutors could just charge anyone with a capital crime at their discretion, and it would fall on the defendant to go to trial and fight it. this would inevitably lead to even more bias against poor minorities who, for socioeconomic reasons, cannot afford proper counsel beyond a public defender.
Fair call - you are likewise entitled to believe and support what you see as working (or not as the case may be).
If the grand jury system is sound - which it may well be - why does the perception of injustice hang over so many cases of this nature, and do you see any way around it?
I'm just trying to have a dialogue man, I'm curious to hear where people see the problems and solutions existing.
Or is there nothing wrong? That seems to be what some people here are saying.