• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

EADD Theology Megathread - Book II - Exodus

Status
Not open for further replies.
You got 8 out of 20 correct, or 40 %

:p

Questions are shit though.. none of them are based on important parts.

You come up with a way of explaining the plagiarism of the old testament to construct the story of the life of Jesus yet?

(Minus the mythological additions)
 
Last edited:
Did you come up with any answer to occams razor's objections to the idea of a fictional jesus, consciously invented as a tool of control, as opposed to some gradual process of adoption/adaption/accrual of nebulous ideas as useful to whichever then-present elites (like how real shit usually happens)? (hi btw) I'm pretty sure that 'their' jesus didn't exist, and that the version of christianity we ended up with was created/modified with an eye to social control by the romans; but occam pushes me towards there being an actual jesus-shaped grain of sand at the heart of that monstrous pearl (i tend to think a gnostic or radical one, which is why they had to edit it so much to make it a suitable roman state religion).

All art is plaigiarism to some extent - does that mean we doubt the artist's existence? Do we say buddha/gotama didn't exist cos he pinched so much of his stuff from the bhagavad gita? Linking contemporary stuff with the old testament was how they rolled in 1st century palestine (look at the peshers in Qumran); even in the bible the politically conscious playing out of biblical myths is pretty plain to see (like Jerusalem on a donkey/palm leaves etc) difficult to not see as knowingly done - jesus being a jew, he should have known the old testament quite well (as would the jewish recipients of this new 'fake' religion). (i only question your theory so much cos i want to believe it, but i don't want some clevershit like me to be able to drop the obvious objections on me and make me look a div ;))
 
Last edited:
You got 8 out of 20 correct, or 40 %

:p

Questions are shit though.. none of them are based on important parts.

You come up with a way of explaining the plagiarism of the old testament to construct the story of the life of Jesus yet?

What? You mean all THIS

NSFW:
Rickolasnice said:
Type 1 (T1) : Author explicitly references Hebrew scriptures
Type 2 (T2) : Author uses Hebrew scriptures for underlying theme
Type 3 (T3) : Author quotes or paraphrases Hebrew scripture without indicating they have done so (implicit reference)

Type 1:

John 12:
12 The next day the great crowd that had come to the festival heard that Jesus was coming to Jerusalem. 13 So they took branches of palm trees and went out to meet him, shouting,

‘Hosanna!
Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord—
the King of Israel!’
14 Jesus found a young donkey and sat on it; as it is written:

15 ‘Do not be afraid, daughter of Zion.
Look, your king is coming,
sitting on a donkey’s colt!’
16 His disciples did not understand these things at first; but when Jesus was glorified, then they remembered that these things had been written of him and had been done to him.

This passage in John refers to Zechariah 9, which discusses the judgment of the enemies of Israel and the coming of a warrior who will lead the Israelites against their enemies:

Zechariah 9:
9 Rejoice greatly, O daughter Zion!
Shout aloud, O daughter Jerusalem!
Lo, your king comes to you;
triumphant and victorious is he,
humble and riding on a donkey,
on a colt, the foal of a donkey.
10 I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim
and the warhorse from Jerusalem;
and the battle-bow shall be cut off,
and he shall command peace to the nations;
his dominion shall be from sea to sea,
and from the River to the ends of the earth.

Type 2:

Isaiah 53 is known as the passage of the "Suffering Servant". The passage actually starts in Isaiah 52 with lamentations about the occupation of Israel by foreign rulers and the selling of Jews into slavery. Isaiah 53 is seen as an underlying theme for the entire story of Jesus Christ.

Isaiah 53:
Who has believed what we have heard?
And to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?
For he grew up before him like a young plant,
and like a root out of dry ground;
he had no form or majesty that we should look at him,
nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.
He was despised and rejected by others;
a man of suffering and acquainted with infirmity;
and as one from whom others hide their faces
he was despised, and we held him of no account.

Surely he has borne our infirmities
and carried our diseases;
yet we accounted him stricken,
struck down by God, and afflicted.
But he was wounded for our transgressions,
crushed for our iniquities;
upon him was the punishment that made us whole,
and by his bruises we are healed.
All we like sheep have gone astray;
we have all turned to our own way,
and the Lord has laid on him
the iniquity of us all.

He was oppressed, and he was afflicted,
yet he did not open his mouth;
like a lamb that is led to the slaughter,
and like a sheep that before its shearers is silent,
so he did not open his mouth.
By a perversion of justice he was taken away.
Who could have imagined his future?
For he was cut off from the land of the living,
stricken for the transgression of my people.
They made his grave with the wicked
and his tomb with the rich,
although he had done no violence,
and there was no deceit in his mouth.

Yet it was the will of the Lord to crush him with pain.
When you make his life an offering for sin,
he shall see his offspring, and shall prolong his days;
through him the will of the Lord shall prosper.
Out of his anguish he shall see light;
he shall find satisfaction through his knowledge.
The righteous one, my servant, shall make many righteous,
and he shall bear their iniquities.
Therefore I will allot him a portion with the great,
and he shall divide the spoil with the strong;
because he poured out himself to death,
and was numbered with the transgressors;
yet he bore the sin of many,
and made intercession for the transgressors.

Type 3:

The crucifixion scene in the Gospels of Mark and Matthew (Matthew's is copied from Mark with some minor additions) is based on Psalm 22. Psalm 69 and Isaiah 50 are also referenced, and Matthew adds on an allusion to Ezekiel 37 as well as some other references.

New Testament Old Testament
Matthew 27:

30 They spit on him, and took the staff and struck him on the head again and again. 31 After they had mocked him, they took off the robe and put his own clothes on him. Then they led him away to crucify him.
32 As they were going out, they met a man from Cyrene, named Simon, and they forced him to carry the cross. 33 They came to a place called Golgotha (which means The Place of the Skull). 34 There they offered Jesus wine to drink, mixed with gall; but after tasting it, he refused to drink it. 35 When they had crucified him, they divided up his clothes by casting lots. 36 And sitting down, they kept watch over him there. 37 Above his head they placed the written charge against him: THIS IS JESUS, THE KING OF THE JEWS. 38 Two robbers were crucified with him, one on his right and one on his left. 39 Those who passed by hurled insults at him, shaking their heads 40 and saying, "You who are going to destroy the temple and build it in three days, save yourself! Come down from the cross, if you are the Son of God!"

41 In the same way the chief priests, the teachers of the law and the elders mocked him. 42 "He saved others," they said, "but he can't save himself! He's the King of Israel! Let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe in him. 43 He trusts in God. Let God rescue him now if he wants him, for he said, 'I am the Son of God.' " 44 In the same way the robbers who were crucified with him also heaped insults on him.

45 From the sixth hour* until the ninth hour darkness came over all the land. 46 About the ninth hour Jesus cried out in a loud voice, "Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?"—which means, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"

47 When some of those standing there heard this, they said, "He's calling Elijah.

48 Immediately one of them ran and got a sponge. He filled it with wine vinegar, put it on a stick, and offered it to Jesus to drink. 49 The rest said, "Now leave him alone. Let's see if Elijah comes to save him."

50 And when Jesus had cried out again in a loud voice, he gave up his spirit.

51 At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth shook and the rocks split. 52 The tombs broke open and the bodies of many holy people who had died were raised to life. 53 They came out of the tombs, and after Jesus' resurrection they went into the holy city and appeared to many people.

* The sixth hour is noon

Isaiah 50:
6 I offered my back to those who beat me, my cheeks to those who pulled out my beard; I did not hide my face from mocking and spitting.
Amos 2:
11 I also raised up prophets from among your sons and Nazirites from among your young men. Is this not true, people of Israel?' declares the LORD. 12 'But you made the Nazirites drink wine and commanded the prophets not to prophesy.

Psalm 22:
1 My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?
Why are you so far from saving me,
so far from the words of my groaning?
...
7 All who see me mock me;
they hurl insults, shaking their heads:
8 "He trusts in the LORD;
let the LORD rescue him.
Let him deliver him,
since he delights in him."
...
16 Dogs have surrounded me;
a band of evil men has encircled me,
they have pierced my hands and my feet.
17 I can count all my bones;
people stare and gloat over me.
18 They divide my garments among them
and cast lots for my clothing.

Psalm 69:
Insults have broken my heart, so that I am in despair. I looked for pity, but there was none; and for comforters, but I found none. They gave me poison for food, and for my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink.

Amos 8:
8 "Will not the land tremble for this, and all who live in it mourn? ... 9 "In that day," declares the Sovereign LORD, "I will make the sun go down at noon and darken the earth in broad daylight.

Ezekiel 37:
12 Therefore prophesy and say to them: 'This is what the Sovereign LORD says: O my people, I am going to open your graves and bring you up from them; I will bring you back to the land of Israel. 13 Then you, my people, will know that I am the LORD, when I open your graves and bring you up from them. 14 I will put my Spirit in you and you will live, and I will settle you in your own land. Then you will know that I the LORD have spoken, and I have done it, declares the LORD.' "

The crucifixion scenes in Matthew and Mark do not openly indicate that they are based on other scriptures, but the details of the scenes are nevertheless drawn directly from the older scriptures.

Psalms 22 and 69 are not prophecies at all, they are lamentation songs, and thus the similarities between the psalms and the Gospel stories could not be called "prophesy fulfillment" under any circumstance. In addition, the phrase "they have pierced my hands and my feet" is a mistranslation, and is not a part of the Hebrew text, but is a later variant of a Greek translation of the text.

Now, when it comes to the question of whether the crucifixion accounts of Mark and Matthew are historical, the fact that the scenes are clearly inspired by Isaiah 53, and parts of them are directly copied from Psalm 22, Psalm 69, Ezekiel 37, etc. means that the authors are not writing from either their own witnessing of the event or from a secondary telling of the account, they are writing from the scriptures. Their source for the story is the older scriptures - well, Mark's source is the older scriptures, and Matthew's source is Mark, plus his own additional references.

Clearly the story of the crucifixion of Jesus doesn't require a real event for its inspiration, all of the ideas needed to inspire the story already existed in the scriptures.

The thing is, the entire story of Jesus follows this pattern. Pretty much every detail of the life of Jesus comes from the existing literature from before his supposed time. To get an idea of the extent to which this is the case we can look at one of the Gospels and identify the scriptural basis for the events in the story of Jesus. A lot of these references are the same across all the Gospels, so I will just use the Gospel of Matthew here because it contains the most events and much of it is identical to Mark.

Here is an outline of the story of Jesus, based on the outline provided by the New International Version (NIV) Bible, with references to the passages in what we call the Old Testament that serve as the basis for the elements of the story as told by the author of Matthew. I use T1, T2, and T3 to designate the type of reference that is used. I won't present every quote due to length, but I will present some of the key quotes. I am also leaving out all of the parables because I am concerned here with the supposed events of the life of Jesus, i.e. the plot of the story:

Birth of Jesus:
T1: Matthew 1:2 - Isaiah 7:14 (based on Greek mistranslation):
"Then Isaiah said, 'Hear now, you house of David! Is it not enough to try the patience of men? Will you try the patience of my God also? 14 Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel.' "(Note: This is a mistranslation that will be addressed in the next section.)
T2: Matthew 1 - Isaiah 9:6:
"For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace."

Born in Bethlehem:
T1: Matthew 2:5 - Micah 5:2:
"But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times. "

Escape to Egypt:
T1: Matthew 2:15 - Hosea 11:1:
"When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son."

Massacre of the Innocents:
T1: Matthew 2:17 - Jeremiah 31:15
T2: Matthew 2:16 - Exodus 1:22
"Then Pharaoh gave this order to all his people: "Every boy that is born to the Hebrews you must throw into the Nile, but let every girl live.""

The Return to Nazareth:
T1: Matthew 2:23 - Judges 13:5:
"because you will conceive and give birth to a son. No razor may be used on his head, because the boy is to be a Nazirite, set apart to God from birth, and he will begin the deliverance of Israel from the hands of the Philistines." (Note: Jesus was called a Nazorean in the gospels because he supposedly lived in a place called Nazareth, but this refers to Samson being from a Nazirite sect. The author himself made the reference however)

John the Baptist Prepares the Way:
T1: Matthew 3:3 - Isaiah 40:3:
"A voice of one calling: 'In the desert prepare the way for the LORD ;make straight in the wilderness a highway for our God."
T3: Matthew 3:4 - 2 Kings 2:8:
"They replied, 'He was a man with a garment of hair and with a leather belt around his waist.' The king said, 'That was Elijah the Tishbite.'" (Note: Matthew 3:4 says: "John's clothes were made of camel's hair, and he had a leather belt around his waist." Later in the story Jesus indicates that John was Elijah.)

The Temptation of Jesus:
T1: Matthew 4:6 - Psalm 91:11,12
T1: Matthew 4:7 - Deuteronomy 6:16
T1: Matthew 4:10 - Deuteronomy 6:13

Jesus Begins to Preach in Galilee:
T1: Matthew 4:12 - Isaiah 9:1:
"Nevertheless, there will be no more gloom for those who were in distress. In the past he humbled the land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali, but in the future he will honor Galilee of the Gentiles, by the way of the sea, along the Jordan"

Jesus Heals the Sick:
T2: Matthew 4:23 - Isaiah 53

Sermon on the Mount:
T2: Matthew 5-7 - Exodus 19...:
(Note: The Sermon on the Mount {which is only in the Gospel of Matthew} refers to how only Moses was allowed up the mountain in Exodus, but Jesus brings everyone up the mountain. Jesus then gives new interpretations of the Commandments and Laws {from Exodus 20...})

Jesus Heals Many:
T2: Matthew 8 - Isaiah 53

Jesus Calms the Storm:
T2: Matthew 8:27 - Psalm 107 28-29:
"Then they cried to the Lord in their trouble, and he brought them out from their distress; he made the storm be still, and the waves of the sea were hushed."

Jesus Heals a Paralytic:
T2: Matthew 9:6 - Isaiah 53
T2: Matthew 9:6 - Isaiah 35:5-6:
"Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf unstopped; then the lame shall leap like a deer, and the tongue of the speechless sing for joy."

Jesus Consorts with Sinners:
T1: Matthew 9:12 - Hosea 6:6:
"For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgment of God rather than burnt offerings."

A Dead Girl and a Sick Woman:
T2: Matthew 9:22 - Isaiah 53
T2: Matthew 9:25 - Isaiah 26:19:
"But your dead will live; their bodies will rise"

Jesus Heals the Blind and Mute:
T2: Matthew 9:29 - Isaiah 53
T2: Matthew 9:6 - Isaiah 35:5-6

Jesus Sends Out the Twelve:
T2: Matthew 10 - Joshua 4:1-2
"...the LORD said to Joshua, 'Choose twelve men from among the people, one from each tribe...'" (Note: The number 12 is used throughout the "Old Testament" to represent 12 people, 12 rulers, 12 tribes, 12 special objects, etc. Also, Joshua and Jesus are the same name in Hebrew.)
T1: Matthew 10:34 - Micah 7:6

Jesus and John the Baptist:
T2: Matthew 11:5 - Isaiah 53
T1: Matthew 11:10 - Malachi 3:
"'See, I will send my messenger, who will prepare the way before me. Then suddenly the Lord you are seeking will come to his temple; the messenger of the covenant, whom you desire, will come,' says the LORD Almighty."

Woe on Unrepentant Cities::
T2: Matthew 11:20 - Genesis 19

God's Chosen Servant:
T2: Matthew 12:17 - Isaiah 53
T1: Matthew 12:17 - Isaiah 42:1-4::
"'Here is my servant, whom I uphold, my chosen one in whom I delight; I will put my Spirit on him and he will bring justice to the nations. He will not shout or cry out, or raise his voice in the streets. A bruised reed he will not break, and a smoldering wick he will not snuff out. In faithfulness he will bring forth justice; he will not falter or be discouraged till he establishes justice on earth. In his law the islands will put their hope.'"

Jesus and Beelzebub:
T2: Matthew 12:24 - 2 Kings 1:1-4

The Sign of Jonah:
T1: Matthew 12:40 - Jonah 1:17

Jesus Walks on the Water:
T2: Matthew 14:25 - Isaiah 43:5-6:
"When you pass through the waters, I will be with you; and when you pass through the rivers, they will not sweep over you. ... For I am the LORD, your God, the Holy One of Israel, your Savior;" (Note: Walking on water was also a theme in Greek hero literature)

The Demand for a Sign:
T2: Matthew 16:4 - Jonah 1:17
T2: Matthew 16:1 - Genesis 19

Jesus Predicts His Death:
T2: Matthew 16:21 - Isaiah 53

The Transfiguration:
T2: Matthew 17:2 - Exodus 34:29:
"When Moses came down from Mount Sinai with the two tablets of the Testimony in his hands, he was not aware that his face was radiant because he had spoken with the LORD."
T2: Matthew 17:2 - Daniel 12:2-4:
"Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. Those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the dome, and those who lead many to righteousness, like the stars for ever and ever. But you, Daniel, keep the words secret and the book sealed until the time of the end." (Note: This shows the transfiguration as a foreshadowing of the resurrection)
T2: Matthew 17:11 - Isaiah 40:3
(Note: The symbolism in the transfiguration scene also reflects stories about Moses in the Hebrew midrash, as well as typical the sun-god imagery of the Greeks. See also: Philo, On the Life of Moses II, (28 "And some time afterwards, when he was about to depart from hence to heaven, to take up his abode there, and leaving this mortal life to become immortal, having been summoned by the Father, who now changed him, having previously been a double being, composed of soul and body, into the nature of a single body, transforming him wholly and entirely into a most sun-like mind;")

The Healing of a Boy With a Demon:
T2: Matthew 17:17 - Isaiah 53

Jesus Again Predicts His Death:
T2: Matthew 20:18 - Isaiah 53
T2: Matthew 20:18 - Jonah 1:17
T2: Matthew 20:19 - Psalm 22

Two Blind Men Receive Sight:
T2: Matthew 20:29 - Isaiah 53
T2: Matthew 9:6 - Isaiah 35:5

The Triumphal Entry:
T1: Matthew 21:2 - Zechariah 9:9:
"Rejoice greatly, O daughter Zion! Shout aloud, O daughter Jerusalem! Lo, your king comes to you; triumphant and victorious is he, humble and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey."
T3: Matthew 21:9 - Psalm 118:26

Jesus at the Temple:
T1: Matthew 21:12 - Isaiah 56:7
"...for my house will be called a house of prayer for all nations."
T2: Matthew 21:12 - Zechariah 14.21:
"Every pot in Jerusalem and Judah will be holy to the LORD Almighty, and all who come to sacrifice will take some of the pots and cook in them. And on that day there will no longer be a merchant in the house of the LORD Almighty."
T2: Matthew 21:12 - Nehemiah 13:4-9:
"And I was very angry, and I threw all the household furniture of Tobiah out of the room [in the temple]. Then I gave orders and they cleansed the chambers, and I brought back the vessels of the house of God, with the grain-offering and the frankincense."
T2: Matthew 21:12 - Hosea 9:15
"Because of their sinful deeds, I will drive them out of my house."

The Fig Tree Withers:
T2: Matthew 21:19 - Hosea 9
"1 Do not rejoice, O Israel; do not be jubilant like the other nations. For you have been unfaithful to your God; ... 7 The days of punishment are coming, the days of reckoning are at hand. Let Israel know this. Because your sins are so many and your hostility so great, the prophet is considered a fool, the inspired man a maniac. 8 The prophet, along with my God, is the watchman over Ephraim, yet snares await him on all his paths, and hostility in the house of his God. 9 They have sunk deep into corruption, as in the days of Gibeah. God will remember their wickedness and punish them for their sins. 10 'When I found Israel, it was like finding grapes in the desert; when I saw your fathers, it was like seeing the early fruit on the fig tree. But when they came to Baal Peor, they consecrated themselves to that shameful idol and became as vile as the thing they loved. 15'... Because of their sinful deeds, I will drive them out of my house. I will no longer love them; all their leaders are rebellious. 16 Ephraim is blighted, their root is withered, they yield no fruit. Even if they bear children, I will slay their cherished offspring.' 17 My God will reject them because they have not obeyed him; they will be wanderers among the nations." (Note: Many scholars have interpreted the cursing of the fig tree as a metaphor for Jesus' rejecting of those Jews who reject him and as a foreshadowing of his second coming and judgment. Hosea 9 provides the scriptural basis for this symbolism)

Signs of the End of the Age:
T3: Matthew 24 - Daniel 9:24-27:
"'Seventy weeks are decreed for your people and your holy city to finish transgression, to put an end to sin, to atone for wickedness, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint the most holy. Know and understand this: From the issuing of the decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven weeks, and sixty-two weeks. It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble. After the sixty-two week, the Anointed One will be cut off and will have nothing. The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood: War will continue until the end, and desolations have been decreed. He will confirm a covenant with many for one week. In the middle of the week he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on a wing of the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him.'"
T3: Matthew 24 - Daniel 11:31, 12:11
T3: Matthew 24 - Isaiah 13:8-11
"Terror will seize them, pain and anguish will grip them; they will writhe like a woman in labor. They will look aghast at each other, their faces aflame. See, the day of the LORD is coming —a cruel day, with wrath and fierce anger— to make the land desolate and destroy the sinners within it. The stars of heaven and their constellations will not show their light. The rising sun will be darkened and the moon will not give its light. I will punish the world for its evil, the wicked for their sins. I will put an end to the arrogance of the haughty and will humble the pride of the ruthless."
T3: Matthew 24 - Isaiah 34
"1 Come near, you nations, and listen; pay attention, you peoples! Let the earth hear, and all that is in it, the world, and all that comes out of it! 2 The LORD is angry with all nations; his wrath is upon all their armies. He will totally destroy them, he will give them over to slaughter. 3 Their slain will be thrown out, their dead bodies will send up a stench; the mountains will be soaked with their blood. 4 All the stars of the heavens will be dissolved and the sky rolled up like a scroll; all the starry host will fall like withered leaves from the vine, like shriveled figs from the fig tree. 5 My sword has drunk its fill in the heavens; see, it descends in judgment on Edom, the people I have totally destroyed. 6 The sword of the LORD is bathed in blood, it is covered with fat— the blood of lambs and goats..."

Judas Agrees to Betray Jesus:
T2: Matthew 26:14 - Amos 2
"4 This is what the LORD says: 'For three sins of Judah, even for four, I will not turn back [my wrath]. ... 5 I will send fire upon Judah that will consume the fortresses of Jerusalem.' 6 '... They sell the righteous for silver, and the needy for a pair of sandals. ... 11 I also raised up prophets from among your sons and Nazirites from among your young men. Is this not true, people of Israel?' declares the LORD. 12 'But you made the Nazirites drink wine and commanded the prophets not to prophesy. 13 Now then, I will crush you as a cart crushes when loaded with grain. (Note: The distinction between "Judas" and "Judah" is a part of English translation. In the original Greek they were both written as "Ioudas", thus these names were the same.)

The Lord's Supper:
T2: Matthew 26:20 - Psalm 41:9:
"Even the friend whom I trusted, who ate at my table, exults in my misfortune."

Jesus Predicts Peter's Denial:
T1: Matthew 26:31 - Zechariah 13:7:
"'Awake, O sword, against my shepherd, against the man who is close to me!' declares the LORD Almighty. 'Strike the shepherd, and the sheep will be scattered, and I will turn my hand against the little ones"

Jesus' Prayers of the Cup at Gethsemane:
T2: Matthew 26:36 - Zechariah 12:2:
"I am going to make Jerusalem a cup that sends all the surrounding peoples reeling. Judah will be besieged as well as Jerusalem. 3 On that day, when all the nations of the earth are gathered against her, I will make Jerusalem an immovable rock for all the nations."
T2: Matthew 26:36 - Psalm 16:5
"LORD, you have assigned me my portion and my cup; you have made my lot secure."

Jesus Arrested:
T2: Matthew 26:55 - Isaiah 53:7-8:
"...he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth. 8 By oppression and judgment he was taken away. And who can speak of his descendants? For he was cut off from the land of the living; for the transgression of my people he was stricken. "

Peter Disowns Jesus:
T1: Matthew 27:72 - Zechariah 13:7

Judas Hangs Himself:
T1: Matthew 27:4-10 - Zechariah 11:12-13:
T2: Matthew 27:4-10 - Jeremiah 19, Jeremiah 32

The Soldiers Mock Jesus :
T3: Matthew 27:27 - Flaccus IV ; Philo (Note: The mocking of people as kings was a common practice at the time, one such event was recorded by the Jewish writer Philo, and may be the basis for the mocking of Jesus scene):
"(36) There was a certain madman named Carabbas ... and setting him up there on high that he might be seen by everybody, flattened out a leaf of papyrus and put it on his head instead of a diadem, and clothed the rest of his body with a common door mat instead of a cloak and instead of a scepter they put in his hand a small stick of the native papyrus which they found lying by the way side and gave to him; (3 and when, like actors in theatrical spectacles, he had received all the insignia of royal authority, and had been dressed and adorned like a king, the young men bearing sticks on their shoulders stood on each side of him instead of spear-bearers, in imitation of the bodyguards of the king, and then others came up, some as if to salute him, and others making as though they wished to plead their causes before him, and others pretending to wish to consult with him about the affairs of the state. (39) Then from the multitude of those who were standing around there arose a wonderful shout of men calling out Maris!; and this is the name by which it is said that they call the kings among the Syrians; for they knew that Agrippa [King Herod of the Jews] was by birth a Syrian, and also that he was possessed of a great district of Syria of which he was the sovereign;"
T3: Matthew 27:30 - Isaiah 50

The Crucifixion of Jesus:
T2: Matthew 27:32-44 - Isaiah 53
T3: Matthew 27:32-44 - Psalm 22
T3: Matthew 27:32-44 - Amos 2
T3: Matthew 27:32-44 - Psalm 69
T3: Matthew 27:45 - Amos 8

The Death of Jesus:
T2: Matthew 27:32-44 - Isaiah 53
T3: Matthew 27:32-44 - Psalm 22
T3: Matthew 27:32-44 - Psalm 69
T2: Matthew 27:52 - Ezekiel 37:11-13

The Burial of Jesus:
T2: Matthew 26:57 - Deuteronomy 21:22-23:
"If a man has committed a sin worthy of death, and he is put to death, and you hang him on a tree [or plank], his corpse shall not hang all night on the tree, but you shall surely bury him on the same day, for he who is hanged is the curse of God, so that you do not defile your land which the Lord your God gives you as an inheritance."
T2: Matthew 26:57 - Isaiah 53:9:
"They made his grave with the wicked and his tomb with the rich, although he had done no violence, and there was no deceit in his mouth." (Note: Jesus was placed in the tomb of a rich man)

The Resurrection
T2: Matthew 28:7 - Isaiah 26:19:
"Your dead shall live, their corpses shall rise. O dwellers in the dust, awake and sing for joy! For your dew is a radiant dew, and the earth will give birth to those long dead."
T2: Matthew 28:7 - Ezekiel 37:
"1 The hand of the Lord came upon me, and he brought me out by the spirit of the Lord and set me down in the middle of a valley; it was full of bones. 2 He led me all round them; there were very many lying in the valley, and they were very dry. 3 He said to me, ‘Mortal, can these bones live?’ I answered, ‘O Lord God, you know.’ 4 Then he said to me, ‘Prophesy to these bones, and say to them: O dry bones, hear the word of the Lord. 5 Thus says the Lord God to these bones: I will cause spirit to enter you, and you shall live. 6 I will lay sinews on you, and will cause flesh to come upon you, and cover you with skin, and put spirit in you, and you shall live; and you shall know that I am the Lord.’"
T2: Matthew 28:7 - Daniel 12:2-4:
"Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. Those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the dome, and those who lead many to righteousness, like the stars for ever and ever. But you, Daniel, keep the words secret and the book sealed until the time of the end."
(Note: The resurrection of Jesus was portrayed as a sign of the end and as proof of the time of resurrections for all people)

As you can see, essentially the entire story of Jesus can be told from the writings that preceded it. The Jesus character in the Gospels is an archetypal figure drawn straight from the Hebrew scriptures, with an influence from the surrounding Greek culture as well.

Because of the fact that the Gospel of Mark is the root of all the Gospels, especially the synoptic Gospels, it is interesting to note how specific scriptural references made by the author of Mark became changed and somewhat lost by the later authors who copied from the Gospel of Mark. Perhaps the best example of this is the cursing of the fig tree.

The cursing of the fig tree in the Gospel of Mark is clearly based on an Old Testament scripture, but the writer of Matthew does not seem to have recognized this and lost the reference. Here is the cursing of the fig tree from the Gospel of Mark.

Mark 11:
12 The next day as they were leaving Bethany, Jesus was hungry. 13 Seeing in the distance a fig tree in leaf, he went to find out if it had any fruit. When he reached it, he found nothing but leaves, because it was not the season for figs. 14 Then he said to the tree, "May no one ever eat fruit from you again." And his disciples heard him say it.

15 On reaching Jerusalem, Jesus entered the temple area and began driving out those who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves, 16 and would not allow anyone to carry merchandise through the temple courts. 17 And as he taught them, he said, "Is it not written:

"'My house will be called a house of prayer for all nations'? But you have made it 'a den of robbers.'"

18 The chief priests and the teachers of the law heard this and began looking for a way to kill him, for they feared him, because the whole crowd was amazed at his teaching.

19 When evening came, they went out of the city.

20 In the morning, as they went along, they saw the fig tree withered from the roots. 21 Peter remembered and said to Jesus, "Rabbi, look! The fig tree you cursed has withered!"

This entire scene is based on Hosea 9, and refers to the destruction of Israel.

Hosea 9:
1 Do not rejoice, O Israel; do not be jubilant like the other nations. For you have been unfaithful to your God; ...
7 The days of punishment are coming, the days of reckoning are at hand. Let Israel know this. Because your sins are so many and your hostility so great, the prophet is considered a fool, the inspired man a maniac.
8 The prophet, along with my God, is the watchman over Ephraim, yet snares await him on all his paths, and hostility in the house of his God.
9 They have sunk deep into corruption, as in the days of Gibeah. God will remember their wickedness and punish them for their sins.
10 'When I found Israel, it was like finding grapes in the desert; when I saw your fathers, it was like seeing the early fruit on the fig tree. But when they came to Baal Peor, they consecrated themselves to that shameful idol and became as vile as the thing they loved.
11 Ephraim's glory will fly away like a bird—no birth, no pregnancy, no conception.
12 Even if they rear children, I will bereave them of every one. Woe to them when I turn away from them!
13 I have seen Ephraim, like Tyre, planted in a pleasant place. But Ephraim will bring out their children to the slayer."
14 Give them, O LORD—what will you give them? Give them wombs that miscarry and breasts that are dry.
15 "Because of all their wickedness in Gilgal, I hated them there. Because of their sinful deeds, I will drive them out of my house. I will no longer love them; all their leaders are rebellious.
16 Ephraim is blighted, their root is withered, they yield no fruit. Even if they bear children, I will slay their cherished offspring.'
17 My God will reject them because they have not obeyed him;
We can clearly see here that the author of Mark uses Hosea 9 for his motif, because in Mark 11 the fig tree is in leaf but not in season, meaning that it was early in the growing season. Then Jesus goes to the temple to drive the people "out of his house". After that they return to the fig tree where they see that it was withered "from the root." This makes the parallel between Mark and Hosea 9 very clear, and shows that Hosea 9 was obviously the inspiration for all of these scenes. The author of Mark was also clearly making a reference to the meaning in the text of Hosea 9. Hosea 9 is talking about the destruction of Israel in no uncertain terms. The reader is supposed to make this connection and understand this as the meaning in the story.

But, let's look at how the writer of Matthew, the only other Gospel to include this scene, recorded this passage.

Matthew 21:
12 Jesus entered the temple area and drove out all who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves. 13"It is written," he said to them, " 'My house will be called a house of prayer,' but you are making it a 'den of robbers.'"

14 The blind and the lame came to him at the temple, and he healed them. 15 But when the chief priests and the teachers of the law saw the wonderful things he did and the children shouting in the temple area, "Hosanna to the Son of David," they were indignant.

16 "Do you hear what these children are saying?" they asked him.

"Yes," replied Jesus, "have you never read," 'From the lips of children and infants you have ordained praise'?"

17 And he left them and went out of the city to Bethany, where he spent the night.

18 Early in the morning, as he was on his way back to the city, he was hungry. 19 Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, "May you never bear fruit again!" Immediately the tree withered.

20 When the disciples saw this, they were amazed. "How did the fig tree wither so quickly?" they asked.

Here the entire scene is obviously changed around in such a way that it no longer mirrors the template from Hosea 9 and the references to being out of season are lost, as well as the reference to the root. The parallel with the Hosea 9 is pretty much lost here, so it would seem that the author of Matthew didn't recognize the parallel himself. It is also likely that the the author of Matthew thought that the original text of Mark seemed absurd, for why would Jesus have expected to see fruit on a tree before the season in the first place? In Matthew the deeper symbolism is lost and this now looks like a recounting of some historical event instead of what it really is, which is a literary allusion. The author of Matthew also added additional details to a story that was clearly contrived in the first place, so we can see here the growing of legend.

Despite this, there are still many recognizable parallels between the Hebrew scriptures and all of the Gospel texts. Christians claim that the parallels between the Gospels and the "Old Testament" texts are due to the fact that all of the parallels are prophecies that Jesus was fulfilling, but close inspection of the references shows that many of them are not even prophecies and that few of them actually could relate to the Jesus story. Regardless, even if they did all relate to the story there is nothing to show that the story was not simply crafted from the existing scriptures at the time, and indeed, for reasons that will be further discussed, this is by far the most reasonable explanation for the story of Jesus. If I took a copy of the works of Nostradamus today I could sit down and write a story about a character who fulfills hundreds of "his prophecies". Would that make either his predictions or my story "true"? Of course not, but this isn't what the early Church fathers and Christian apologists thought, they viewed the correlations between the Hebrew scriptures (which they typically read in Greek translations) and the story of Jesus as "proof that the religion is true." One of the best examples of this comes from Eusebius of Caesarea, who wrote on this subject in the early 4th century in The Proof of the Gospel:

Grant then, dear friend, my request, and labor with rue henceforward in your prayers in my effort to present the Proof of the Gospel from the prophecies extant among the Hebrews from the earliest times. ... I propose to show, by quotations from them, how they forestalled events that came to the light long ages after their time, the actual circumstances of the Saviour's own presentment of the Gospel.... It shall be my task to prove that they saw that which was not present as present, and that which as yet was not in existence as actually existing; and not only this, but that they foretold in writing the events of the future for posterity, so that by their help others can even now know what is coming....

It seems now time to say what I consider to be desirable at present to draw from the prophetic writings for the proof of the Gospel. They said that Christ, [Whom they named] the Word of God, and Himself both God and Lord, and Angel of Great Counsel, would one day dwell among men, and would become for all the nations of the world, both Greek and Barbarian, a teacher of true knowledge of God, and of such duty to God the Maker of the Universe, as the preaching of the Gospel includes. They said that He would become a little child, and would be called the Son of Man, as born of the race of Mankind. They foretold the wondrous fashion of His birth from a Virgin, and—strangest of all—they did not omit to name Bethlehem the place of His birth, which is to-day so famous that men still hasten from the ends of the earth to see it, but shouted it out with the greatest clearness. As if they stole a march on history these same writers proclaimed the very time of His appearance, the precise period of His sojourn on earth.

It is possible for you, if you care to take the trouble, to see with your eyes, comprehended in the prophetic writings, all the wonderful miracles of our Saviour Jesus Christ Himself, that are witnessed to by the heavenly Gospels, and to hear His divine and perfect teaching about true holiness. How it must move our wonder, when they unmistakably proclaim the new ideal of religion preached by Him to all men, the call of His disciples, and the teaching of the new Covenant. Yes, and in addition to all this they foretell the Jews' disbelief in Him, and disputing, the plots of the rulers, the envy of the Scribes, the treachery of one of His disciples, the schemes of enemies, the accusations of false witnesses, the condemnations of His judges, the shameful violence, unspeakable scourging, ill-omened abuse, and, crowning all, the death of shame. They portray Christ's wonderful silence, His gentleness and fortitude, and the unimaginable depths of His forbearance and forgiveness.

The most ancient Hebrew oracles present all these things definitely about One Who would come in the last times, and Who would undergo such sufferings among men, and they clearly tell the source of their foreknowledge. They bear witness to the Resurrection from the dead of the Being Whom they revealed, His appearance to His disciples, His gift of the Holy Spirit to them, His return to heaven, His establishment as King on His Father's throne and His glorious second Advent yet to be at the consummation of the age. In addition to all this you can hear the wailings and lamentations of each of the prophets, wailing and lamenting characteristically over the calamities which will overtake the Jewish people because of their impiety to Him Who had been foretold. How their kingdom, that had continued from the days of a remote ancestry to their own, would be utterly destroyed after their sin against Christ; how their fathers' Laws would be abrogated, they themselves deprived of their ancient worship, robbed of the independence of their forefathers, and made slaves of their enemies, instead of free men; how their royal metropolis would be burned with fire, their venerable and holy altar undergo the flames and extreme desolation, their city be inhabited no longer by its old possessors but by races of other stock, while they would be dispersed among the Gentiles through the whole world, with never a hope of any cessation of evil, or breathing-space from troubles. And it is plain even to the blind, that what they saw and foretold is fulfilled in actual facts from the very day the Jews laid godless hands on Christ, and drew down on themselves the beginning of the train of sorrows.
- THE PROOF OF THE GOSPEL; Eusebius, 4th century

Amazingly, Eusebius didn't seem to consider the possibility that the reason there are so many parallels between the Gospels and the Hebrew scriptures is that the Gospel writers based their stories on the scriptures.

Prior to Eusebius, Justin Martyr also attributed the "truth" of the Gospels and the "truth" of Jesus Christ to the parallels between the Gospels and the earlier Hebrew scriptures, and he even went so far as to state that the Hebrews themselves were not the authors of their own scriptures, God was, and the Hebrews themselves couldn't understand their own scriptures, since they weren't the true authors, and that the prophecies for Jesus are not all straightforward or self-evident because God presented them in a variety of ways and embedded them in stories. Justin Martyr gave his fullest description of this in his work First Apology, written in the 2nd century. Sections read:

CHAPTER XXXVI -- DIFFERENT MODES OF PROPHECY.

But when you hear the utterances of the prophets spoken as it were personally, you must not suppose that they are spoken by the inspired themselves, but by the Divine Word who moves them. For sometimes He declares things that are to come to pass, in the manner of one who foretells the future; sometimes He speaks as from the person of God the Lord and Father of all; sometimes as from the person of Christ; sometimes as from the person of the people answering the Lord or His Father, just as you can see even in your own writers, one man being the writer of the whole, but introducing the persons who converse. And this the Jews who possessed the books of the prophets did not understand, and therefore did not recognize Christ even when He came, but even hate us who say that He has come, and who prove that, as was predicted, He was crucified by them.

Here Justin Martyr is basically justifying the fact that many of the parallels between the Gospels and the Hebrew scriptures are parts of other stories, songs, and things that by all accounts don't appear to be prophesies. Justin Martyr simply says that everything in the old scriptures is prophecy, thus there are "different modes" of prophecy in the scriptures.

CHAPTER XLII -- PROPHECY USING THE PAST TENSE.

But when the Spirit of prophecy speaks of things that are about to come to pass as if they had already taken place,--as may be observed even in the passages already cited by me,--that this circumstance may afford no excuse to readers [for misinterpreting them], we will make even this also quite plain. The things which He absolutely knows will take place, He predicts as if already they had taken place. And that the utterances must be thus received, you will perceive, if you give your attention to them. The words cited above, David uttered 1500 years before Christ became a man and was crucified; and no one of those who lived before Him, nor yet of His contemporaries, afforded joy to the Gentiles by being crucified. But our Jesus Christ, being crucified and dead, rose again, and having ascended to heaven, reigned; and by those things which were published in His name among all nations by the apostles, there is joy afforded to those who expect the immortality promised by Him.

Here Justin Martyr is specifically justifying parallels between the Gospels and the Hebrew scriptures where the parallels reference phrases that are written in the past tense, which are usually parts of other stories. He also talks about a "prediction of the crucifixion" by David, but there is a major problem here. What he is referring to is Psalm 22, where it says "a band of evil men has encircled me, they have pierced my hands and my feet." The problem here is that the phrase "they have pierced my hands and my feet" is a mistranslation or interpolation, this is not a part of the scriptures in Hebrew, this is only found in later Greek translations of the text. This line originally read as follows: "For dogs have surrounded me; a band of evildoers has encompassed me like a lion, my hands and feet."

More information on the translation of this line can be found here: Psalm 22:16: A Prophecy of the Crucifixion?

Even if the traditional Christian translation of this passage were correct, "they have pierced my hands and my feet" can apply to many things and it has been confirmed many times that the Roman's didn't actually crucify people by putting spikes through their hands because the hands couldn't support the weight. This passage is also the source for the portrayal of Jesus as crucified by putting spikes through his hands and the author of Luke's claim that Jesus proved he had been resurrected by showing the disciples the holes in his hands.

So what we can see is that from the very beginning scholars and theologians have been aware of many of the parallels between the story of Jesus and the Hebrew scriptures, and that early Christians, especially, believed that it was these parallels that proved that the religion was "true". Far from proving the "truth" of the religion, however, these parallels actually show us how the story of Jesus was crafted and demonstrate that the basis of the Jesus story is not reality, but scriptures.



As much as I'd LOVE to read through all that and give a detailed, step - by - step response, from a Christian perspective... my er..... internet is down, and VURTUAL is going to take my place and reply to the whole post, on my behalf!


I've had premonitions - and they definitely weren't me just having some neurochemical-based feeling which convinced me that i had remembered something that i hadn't. I actually did remember it - i had the memory beforehand, then it happened - i recognised it because i had the memory. Maybe my subconscious somehow knew what was going to happen thropugh perfectly scientific means, but again we're back to the mystery of intuition.

I also know someone very closely who has had two 'death apparitions' (loved ones appeared to her at the moment of their death with no possible knowledge of the death until later). This is a very well attested phenomena worldwide (especially after WW1) - how do you explain this? .


Interesting. I see premonitions as a spiritual "nudge" - not proof of supernatural in any kind of empirical manner, but enough to give the individual a suspicion, or reason, to pursue spiritual claims and activity.
 
Interesting. I see premonitions as a spiritual "nudge" - not proof of supernatural in any kind of empirical manner, but enough to give the individual a suspicion, or reason, to pursue spiritual claims and activity.

So you think of god as some active presence behind the curtain who feels the need to nudge people here and there to make them more spiritual? Didn't he have full knowledge of everything before creation and it's all part of some intricate fated plan? Or is him having to nudge the likes of me also part of the plan? If it's down to opur free will to make it on our own, then what's he doing poking his nose in? (we'll never learn like that). If it's not all planned out like that (like the calvinists believe), then how can he be sure that the second coming is going to happen in time, or that any of us will make it past this bit into the kingdom of heaven? (Didn't christians used to believe that heaven was on earth after apocalypse when all the corpses would get up and drag their gravestones to the promised land? (like a zombie ticket) - do any still believe it? (i think jehovas witness have something similar)).

That sort of interventionist micromanaging god for me only fits with tipler/de chardin's 'Omega Point' idea (ie we're in a simulation at the end of the universe, and supernatural/religious stuff is the programmers fixing wrong stuff (they missed a bit)).

I personally think we can see god occaisonally in the world because we can only look at things via our mind, which has got gods in it. We can all access the wisdom/morality of god in our minds (conscience/superego/whatever) - we all know the difference between right and wrong (given enough information) (as do other non-god-chosen animals). By looking within with enough discipline (or by taking a trip with the right set/setting) we can all access a unifying single soul/ground-of-being which we all share called by some brahman (or a pretty good simulation/delusion of such) - i understand how this direct experience can lead one towards goddy type thinking, but i think it's a bit presumptuous; I'll go with what buddha would say when asked about stuff like this (and reincarnation): 'they're unknowables' (he said it more poetically like). (i also find it hard to understand how people can get all that religious without this direct mystical experience of god/mind (especially as it's quite easy to obtain the synthetic chemical version in this day and age))

Edit: btw, i came across this site the other day: http://www.quaker.org.uk/ - now there's a tidy bunch of christians for you - if some fascist takes over britain and institues a christian theocracy forcing everyone into a church, these are the ones i'd join (also, it could come in handy if there's another world war and they bring back conscription).
 
Last edited:
So you think of god as some active presence behind the curtain who feels the need to nudge people here and there to make them more spiritual?

yes indeedidly

Vurtual said:
Didn't he have full knowledge of everything before creation and it's all part of some intricate fated plan? Or is him having to nudge the likes of me also part of the plan?


'Course he has full knowledge, and yeah maybe a nudge or 2 helps bring that into fruition. Let's say Ricko is ordained to be a high preist at the age of 42, then maybe God would "nudge" him and encourage his spirituality and interest in religion at the age of 33, so that his later plans may proceed.

Vurtual said:
If it's not all planned out like that (like the calvinists believe), then how can he be sure that the second coming is going to happen in time,

Being omniscient, he knows the nudges will work with the individual and can be a part of that plan.



next please %)
 
You can't have a divine plan and nudging (unless the plan was shit in the first place) - didn't he forsee the need for the nudging and adjust the big bang recipie (as it were). Also, what about free will? Is that part of the plan? And what if i purposely decide to not do what 'pleases' god just to see what happens? Would that be part of the plan? If so, was he planning on some of us going to hell all along - this would be ethically dubious for a superbeing to say the least (that is if you believe something as patently ridiculous, pointlessly nasty and medievally-madey-uppy as hell).
 
You can't have a divine plan and nudging (unless the plan was shit in the first place) - didn't he forsee the need for the nudging and adjust the big bang recipie (as it were).

I don't see how making people aware, or inclined to accept spirituality can not feature in a plan. Some people need a bit of help to be aware of their spirituality, receiving such help does not mean later God made providences cannot occur in their lives.

Vurtual said:
Also, what about free will? Is that part of the plan? And what if i purposely decide to not do what 'pleases' god just to see what happens? Would that be part of the plan? If so, was he planning on some of us going to hell all along -

The nudging does not negate our choice of free will, it's always possible to dismiss or ignore potential excitement of our spirituality.



Vurtual said:
this would be ethically dubious for a superbeing to say the least (that is if you believe something as patently ridiculous, pointlessly nasty and medievally-madey-uppy as hell).

ridiculous, pointless and nasty?? woah... hold on there...


Recognise this man?
NSFW:

Ian-Brady-Moors-murders.jpg



The guy that sexually tortured and killed children for a few thrills? And what about the family and parents of those children, what unpassing grief they've had to deal with their whole lives??

And I could pull out a few other sicko's, but it's not a very nice subject.



Thing is, evil is very prevalent in our world, in it's sickest degree. And the repercussions and suffering caused from it are just as real. From a philosophical point of view, it leads 2 possibilities.

1) There is no God, and all your peado's, child abusers etc got away with it
2) There is a God and they are going to some kind of hell.


The POV that there is God and no hell (Jehova's believe) simply doesn't make sense. If there is no hell, then there was no need to allow the evil - the cruelty - the suffering, the heartfelt grief of learning a loved one has been victim to one of these people... would have all gone to waste. Putting, evil destructive people on the planet would make no sense.

If you're going to allow all that suffering, it has to be there for a reason, and the only answer to it is hell. And if there is no hell, then there is no God.
 
But raas, you're confusing a planned universe with free will: either it's all planned down to the finest detail or it isn't. If our will is truly free, then we can then divert from the plan; if our free choices are already themselves planned, then there's no need for nudging. Also, if it's all planned, then we can say liam brady is god's fault (oh you said it was god's fault, but it's ok cos he's going to hell forever - is that really any comfort to those relatives? where's the forgiveness in that?).

You can't have free will and calvinism i'm afraid.

And i don't think an eternal punishment for actions in a finite, confused life is anything other than nasty and wrong-headed - especially if we'd already been fated to do that stuff anyway. If it's just a threat to make us behave, fair enough (sort of), but an eternity of pain? Really? How does this fit with 'love your enemy' exactly? Tough Love? If it's meant to 'teach us a lesson', it won't work, unless there's reincarnation and it's not eternal (and even then, negative feedback doesn't often work). The whole idea of eternal pain is totally sadistic - would it still be just after the first million years? The second million? This sort of hell thinking is a product of medieval society, which was pretty sadistic in lots of ways.

I'm afraid i'm just more christian than you ;): i can see that we are all the same person, and that to hate and punish is only to hurt ourselves (ok, that bit's hindu) - to love and understand is the truly christian response. Love is the opposite of ignorance; or if you truly understand someone (in a way maybe only fully accessible to a god-like perspective), you would love them (even ian bradys). There are no evil people - there are (very few) people who do evil things, because they don't know about the truth of the previous sentences - this ignorance is reason for us to pity them rather than hate them. The hate only hurts us anyway and has no effect on them. (that's not to say we shouldn't lock up ian bradys to stop them killing anyone else obviously; but i'm with william godwin on punishment (look him up))
 
Last edited:
Why is god stoppi g me log in on the lap top?

He wants a repentance for all the porn.

rickolasnice said:
You come up with a way of explaining the plagiarism of the old testament to construct the story of the life of Jesus yet?

Ricko, you'll have to word all that more concisely if you want a reply this year. You've pretty much pasted the whole bible out word for word.

But raas, you're confusing a planned universe with free will: either it's all planned down to the finest detail or it isn't. If our will is truly free, then we can then divert from the plan; if our free choices are already themselves planned, then there's no need for nudging. Also, if it's all planned, then we can say liam brady is god's fault (oh you said it was god's fault, but it's ok cos he's going to hell forever - is that really any comfort to those relatives? where's the forgiveness in that?).

You can't have free will and calvinism i'm afraid.

I think there can be elements of pre-determination in place amongst free-will, but you are right that neither can be absolute.


Virtual said:
And i don't think an eternal punishment for actions in a finite, confused life is anything other than nasty and wrong-headed - especially if we'd already been fated to do that stuff anyway. If it's just a threat to make us behave, fair enough (sort of), but an eternity of pain? Really? How does this fit with 'love your enemy' exactly? Tough Love? If it's meant to 'teach us a lesson', it won't work, unless there's reincarnation and it's not eternal (and even then, negative feedback doesn't often work). The whole idea of eternal pain is totally sadistic - would it still be just after the first million years? The second million? This sort of hell thinking is a product of medieval society, which was pretty sadistic in lots of ways.

I'm afraid i'm just more christian than you ;): i can see that we are all the same person, and that to hate and punish is only to hurt ourselves (ok, that bit's hindu) - to love and understand is the truly christian response. Love is the opposite of ignorance; or if you truly understand someone (in a way maybe only fully accessible to a god-like perspective), you would love them (even ian bradys). There are no evil people - there are (very few) people who do evil things, because they don't know about the truth of the previous sentences - this ignorance is reason for us to pity them rather than hate them. The hate only hurts us anyway and has no effect on them. (that's not to say we shouldn't lock up ian bradys to stop them killing anyone else obviously; but i'm with william godwin on punishment (look him up))

As said previously, if the pain grief and suffering of people is to be a reality, it has to have it's reason for existence - and hell makes great sense. You come up with a valid point, that "eternal hell" is too severe.

So it really depends on what hell is and without knowledge of this it's unfair to call it sadistic or unfair. I see the "eternal" aspect of hell entwined to the eternal existence of the sin. For instance, if you murder someone it is impossible to wind back the clock, it stands forever. It cannot be undone. You can try to escape the guilt, by killing yourself or wiping your memory - but as long as you are eternally conscious, you will always be aware. So I see hell as somewhat self-induced; a spiritual state.... rather than the traditional eternal whiplashings in a pit of fire.
 
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/jesus-camp/

From the intimidation, indoctrination, manipulation and brain washing of american children to be radicalised "Warriors of Jesus" to the influence the Evangelical Christians have on American politics.

I recognise the methods being used during these church times and childrens camps.. they're methods known to induce a trance like and suggestible state in adults.. but these are children ffs.. They're already suggestible.

Sickening and truly worrying cult sweeping America like never seen before.



raas.. that is not the whole bible.. it's close to the whole of Jesus' life in a nut shell, that's my point. The life of Jesus was written by people using the OT as a step by step guide of what to write.. then add in mythological attributes from surrounding religions and myths and the teachings of the already established religion of Christianity as written about by Paul., The story of Jesus was a piece allegorical fiction. (not the only evidence for it being so)

The prophecy card just doesn't work..

But it's ok I don't expect a reply.. <3
 
Last edited:
raas.. that is not the whole bible.. it's close to the whole of Jesus' life in a nut shell, that's my point. The life of Jesus was written by people using the OT as a step by step guide of what to write.. then add in mythological attributes from surrounding religions and myths and the teachings of the already established religion of Christianity as written about by Paul., The story of Jesus was a piece allegorical fiction. (not the only evidence for it being so)

The prophecy card just doesn't work..

But it's ok I don't expect a reply.. <3

Ricky,

Without sifting through all that and going tl;drx10 on yer asses - surely the existence of Jesus could have been both prophetic or plagiarised? If prophets claim to have foreknowledge that this "Son of God" would come to the earth and wrote about it, their words could well be prophetic.

Sure, it's plausible to a cynic that he never turned up at all and the Romans then invented him as a means of control yadda yadda... but how can this theory discount the other possibility that he was prophesized??

As far as I can see, it's nothing more than a theory.
 
A lot of the information taken straight from the OT weren't prophecies..

You really want more evidence? (Ask and ye shall receive)

And I don't think the Romans invented him.. that was a hypothesis i put forward.. i don't truly believe it.

Although if you read the works of Josephus.. Titus' rampage went through the same places in the same order as Jesus.. and if you have a keen eye.. you can see some twisted versions of the same events happening along the way.
 
...As said previously, if the pain grief and suffering of people is to be a reality, it has to have it's reason for existence - and hell makes great sense. You come up with a valid point, that "eternal hell" is too severe.

So it really depends on what hell is and without knowledge of this it's unfair to call it sadistic or unfair. I see the "eternal" aspect of hell entwined to the eternal existence of the sin. For instance, if you murder someone it is impossible to wind back the clock, it stands forever. It cannot be undone. You can try to escape the guilt, by killing yourself or wiping your memory - but as long as you are eternally conscious, you will always be aware. So I see hell as somewhat self-induced; a spiritual state.... rather than the traditional eternal whiplashings in a pit of fire.

I still can't see how hell makes sense of pain and suiffering by producing more pain and suffering - it's back to eye for an eye, which should have been neutralised by turn the other cheek/love your enemy.

I was only going by christian ideas of hell as eternal damnation; obviously i don't think it exists, so it's not up to me to define it - and the way it's defined is sadistic (which reflects the medieval culture that developed it). And sin is definitely not eternal is it. If i murder someone, at some point everyone who was affected by the murder will be dead; but i'll still by surfin the lake o' fire with the lord of the flies in the simplistic idea of hell.

I can take the more nuanced version of hell as being full self-knowledge after death allowing a true inspection of all your faults, which might be unpleasant; but equally, that full understanding would lead to us forgiving ourself (and anyone else), as we'd see all the individual events and reasons that lead us to the ignorant state that allowed us to act that way. This is what i understand of jesus' message that we would all be forgiven in the end (even if i'm agnostic about any afterlife).

Actually, i could personally go with: the future and the past is hell (or the ego, where these both have to exist), the present moment is heaven. Anything after death is unknowable, so not worth considering. This is how i understand buddhism in a nutshell (and true christianity imo)
 
Last edited:
Bump for edit

A lot of the information taken straight from the OT weren't prophecies..

Aha. To the point. Can you show me the scripture which supposedly plagiarised his character, that is not considered a prophecy. Also, is this your own theory or a known argument in the theological field? And if so could you link me to more information on it (ie - Who's theory).


I still can't see how hell makes sense of pain and suiffering by producing more pain and suffering - it's back to eye for an eye, which should have been neutralised by turn the other cheek/love your enemy.

Seems to be a bit more complex. Eye for eye refers to some kind of human vengeance, whereas coming to hell seems to be self-induced, spiritual suffering.

Vurtual said:
I was only going by christian ideas of hell as eternal damnation; obviously i don't think it exists, so it's not up to me to define it - and the way it's defined is sadistic (which reflects the medieval culture that developed it). And sin is definitely not eternal is it. If i murder someone, at some point everyone who was affected by the murder will be dead; but i'll still by surfin the lake o' fire with the lord of the flies in the simplistic idea of hell.

A description of hell (specifics) is not given to us, and references to it's being are often oblique and allegorical; using earthly imagery to describe something in another realm. But what is real, is that it is severe. I do not agree with your word "Sadistic", but very severe is how I feel it is referred to. And very severe fits the bill of this world, what else would you expect for mister I -kill-kiddies-for-sexual-gratification?

Vurtual said:
I can take the more nuanced version of hell as being full self-knowledge after death allowing a true inspection of all your faults, which might be unpleasant; but equally, that full understanding would lead to us forgiving ourself (and anyone else), as we'd see all the individual events and reasons that lead us to the ignorant state that allowed us to act that way. This is what i understand of jesus' message that we would all be forgiven in the end (even if i'm agnostic about any afterlife).

That wasn't Jesus's message. Jesus actually said



Mark 3:22-30 states,


“ [Jesus] say to you, all sins will be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they may utter; but he who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is subject to eternal condemnation




Edit interlude:

NSFW:

Anton LaVeys last interview.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeDtI-AHp9U

man this guy is creepy!
 
Last edited:
Well jesus was wrong then (wasn't the first time) - unlimited understanding equals unlimited love and leads to universal forgiveness - that's one of them facts that is (as subjectively proven by me to me). And what exactly is the holy spirit when it's at home? Just so i know not to blaspheme against it - if it can't be defined clearly and obviously, then what's to stop some priest saying 'that bloke was blaspheming against the holy spirit and should be killed; but this bloke [my mate] wasn't so is fine'

You've got more vague about hell now, which is good - what about my point about understanding of your own flaws leading inevitably to understanding/forgiveness? If you now agree that it could be self induced, then where does god/jesus even come into it?

A truly god-level perspective would inevitably accept/create things which in our tiny ape perspective could be seen as evil - that's just a matter of viewpoint (like 'it's an ill wind', or maybe 'god moves in mysterious ways') - in this stoic sort of conception, thinking we can define evil in a general sense when we've got so much 'skin in the game' is a bit nutty really (like asking a mother of a paedo victim to be judge in his case) - eg maybe from a god-like perspective, it would be better for humans to die out so an intelligent species of squid can have a go.

Have you ever read up on stoicism raas? I think you'd find alot to agree with in there (unsurprisingly considering christianity adopted quite a lot of it) - eg marcus aurelius is pretty good

(and you seem to be quite interested in anton lavey for a christian - did you know he was an atheist and didn't actually believe in satan or god? (i didn't watch the vid though)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top