Here's What We Know So Far About How Marijuana Affects Health

slimvictor

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
6,477
Location
"Darkness cannot be dissipated with more darkness.
Many people think that smoking pot is harmless, but there's good evidence that the drug has at least some negative effects on health, a new review says.

Some people who smoke marijuana can become addicted, and use of the drug in the teen years has been linked with abnormalities in certain brain areas important for learning and memory, the review said. And even the immediate short-term effects of the marijuana, such as impaired thinking and coordination, can have consequences, including difficulty in learning in school and an increased risk of car accidents, the review said.

Regular marijuana smokers are also more likely than nonsmokers to have symptoms of chronic bronchitis, such as daily cough and phlegm production.

But whether the drug has long-lasting effects on cognition in adults remains controversial, with some studies suggesting the effects are persistent, and others saying the effects may be reversible, said Dr. Nora Volkow, the director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, who wrote the review along with her colleagues. More research is needed on this topic to provide a definitive answer, she said. [Trippy Tales: The History of 8 Hallucinogens]

Legal drugs, such as alcohol and tobacco, still account for a greater burden of disease than marijuana, but this is because legal drugs are more accessible, and thus more widely used, not necessarily more dangerous, Volkow said.

"As policy shifts toward legalization of marijuana, it is reasonable and probably prudent to hypothesize that [marijuana] use will increase and that, by extension, so will the number of persons for whom there will be negative health consequence," the researchers wrote in the June 5 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Here are a few more highlights from the review:

- Despite the popular belief that the marijuana is not addicting, about 9 percent of those who experiment with the drug, and up to 50 percent who use it every day, will become addicted.

- Smoking marijuana in the teen years is linked with brain abnormalities, such as fewer neural fibers in certain brain areas, decreased brain activity and a smaller hippocampus, an area important for learning and memory. These studies show an association, and cannot prove that marijuana is the cause of the brain abnormalities, or that the abnormalities are harmful. Still, one study found that people who used marijuana heavily as teens had IQ scores that were 8 points lower, on average, than those who didn't use the drug.

- People who use marijuana are at greater risk of abusing other drugs later in life, suggesting that marijuana maybe a "gateway drug." However, it could be that people who are more susceptible to drug use in general tend to start with marijuana because it is more accessible, and then move on to other drugs.

- In people who are genetically at risk for schizophrenia, smoking marijuana is linked with an increased risk of developing the condition. However, its possible factors other than marijuana are responsible for the link.

- A person's risk of a car accident doubles if that individual drives shortly after smoking marijuana.

- It's not clear whether smoking marijuana increases the risk of lung cancer compared with people who don't smoke, but studies suggest that the risk of lung cancer is lower in marijuana smokers than in tobacco smokers.

cont at
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/05/marijuana-health_n_5455508.html
 
But whether the drug has long-lasting effects on cognition in adults remains controversial, with some studies suggesting the effects are persistent, and others saying the effects may be reversible,

I belive they are completely reversible. I also question how much of an effect they actually have. I just know way to many intelligent, highly educated, successful people who are long time heavy cannabis users.

Legal drugs, such as alcohol and tobacco, still account for a greater burden of disease than marijuana, but this is because legal drugs are more accessible, and thus more widely used, not necessarily more dangerous, Volkow said.

I'm not even sure what to say to this. I wonder if she actually believes this. I wonder if budweiser and Philip Morris fund her. after a few of these statements I seriously wonder if she is the right woman for her job. I also wonder how hard she thinks it is to score grass. I have traveled to many places on this blue ball and with very few exceptions have had the sale of grass or hash offered to me without even looking for it. I think this quote shows how outta touch some experts are.

- Despite the popular belief that the marijuana is not addicting, about 9 percent of those who experiment with the drug, and up to 50 percent who use it every day, will become addicted.

50% who use it everyday become addicted.. bullshit. love to see the data for this claim. Lets also not forget that with all the lives ruined and despite ever increasing drug war funding that now totals over a trillion dollars the rates of addiction have remained stagnant.

However, there is no convincing evidence that indicates legalization of drugs will lead to more addicted individuals.

However, other countries like Pakistan have liberal laws concerning the use of drugs like opium, and despite the wide availability of the drug and an entire culture that exists to support it, the country’s overall problems with addiction are not much better – or worse – than other countries that persecute similar drug users.

to examine this further we really only need to look at two modern societies that have made some drugs legal – or tolerated – for use by citizens. The first example is The Netherlands, which has long maintained a policy of tolerance toward marijuana, hash and other soft drug use. Despite this, there are no more addicts in the country than anywhere else; probably because there’s no hysteria over the availability of these substances nor any real risk of using them. Denmark, Jamaica, Costa Rica and a number of other countries have similar policies, with no higher incidences of addiction.

source



Still, one study found that people who used marijuana heavily as teens had IQ scores that were 8 points lower, on average, than those who didn't use the drug.

Im not going to waste my time taking a whole bunch of IQ tests.. but I fit this bill and received IQ scores ranging from 120-136 from all five different online IQ tests I took. Maybe the smokers with higher IQ's had better things to do than participate in the study. I would also like to see the study repeated and the heavy teen smokers required to be a little baked for the test.. bet their scores would go up.

- A person's risk of a car accident doubles if that individual drives shortly after smoking marijuana.

(Cannabis Use and Motor Vehicle Accident Risk) "We found only limited evidence to support the claim that cannabis use increases accident risk. Participants who had driven under the influence of cannabis in the previous year appeared to be no more likely than drug-free drivers to report that they had had an accident in the previous 12 months. Prima facie, this would seem to suggest that cannabis-intoxicated driving is not a risk factor for non-fatal accidents. In this sense, the results would support those of Longo et al. (2000b) who found no relationship between recent cannabis use and driver culpability for non-fatal accidents."
- See more at: http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Marijuana#Driving

"A review of over a dozen of these [laboratory] experiments reveals three findings. First, after using marijuana, people drive more slowly. In addition, they increase the distance between their cars and the car in front of them. Third, they are less likely to attempt to pass other vehicles on the road. All of these practices can decrease the chance of crashes and certainly limit the probability of injury or death if an accident does occur. These three habits may explain the slightly lower risk of accidents that appears in the epidemiological studies. These results contrast dramatically to those found for alcohol. Alcohol intoxication often increases speed and passing while decreasing following distance, and markedly raises the chance of crashes.(632)"
- See more at: http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Marijuana#Driving

"There is considerable evidence from laboratory studies that cannabis (marijuana) impairs reaction time, attention, tracking, hand-eye coordination, and concentration, although not all of these impairments were equally detected by all studies (Couper & Logan, 2004a; Heishman, Stitzer, & Yingling, 1989; Gieringer, 1988; Moskowitz, 1985). In reviewing the literature on marijuana, Smiley (1998) concluded that marijuana impairs performance in divided attention tasks (i.e., a poorer performance on subsidiary tasks). Jones et al. (2003) adds that Smiley’s finding is relevant to the multitasking essence of driving, in particular by making marijuana impaired drivers perhaps less able to handle unexpected events. Interestingly, there is also evidence showing that, unlike alcohol, marijuana enhances rather than mitigates the individual’s perception of impairment (Lamers & Ramaekers, 1999; Robbe & O'Hanlon, 1993; Perez-Reyes, Hicks, Bumberry, Jeffcoat, & Cook, 1988). Robbe and O'Hanlon (1993) reported that in laboratory conditions, drivers under the influence of marijuana were aware of their impairment, which led them to decrease speed, avoid passing other vehicles, and reduce other risk-taking behaviors.
- See more at: http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Marijuana#Driving

"Epidemiological studies have been inconclusive regarding whether cannabis use causes an increased risk of motor vehicle accidents; in contrast, unanimity exists that alcohol use increases crash risk.30 In tests using driving simulation, neurocognitive impairment varies in a dose-related fashion, and symptoms are more pronounced with highly automatic driving functions than with more complex tasks that require conscious control.31 Cannabis smokers tend to over-estimate their impairment and compensate effectively while driving by utilizing a variety of behavioral strategies."
- See more at: http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Marijuana#Driving

"Another paradigm used to assess crash risk is to use cross-sectional surveys of reported nonfatal accidents that can be related to the presence of risk factors, such as alcohol and cannabis consumption. Such a methodology was employed in a provocative dissertation by Laixuthai (1994). This study used data from two large surveys that were nationally representative of high school students in the United States during 1982 and 1989. Results showed that cannabis use was negatively correlated with nonfatal accidents, but these results can be attributed to changes in the amount of alcohol consumed. More specifically, the decriminalization of cannabis and the subsequent reduction in penalty cost, as well as a reduced purchase price of cannabis, made cannabis more appealing and affordable for young consumers. This resulted in more cannabis use, which substituted for alcohol consumption, leading to less frequent and less heavy drinking. The reduction in the amount of alcohol consumed resulted in fewer nonfatal accidents."
- See more at: http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Marijuana#Driving

(Cannabis Use, Alcohol Use, Smartphone Use, and Accident Risk) "Although for the mobile phone conversation and cannabis studies the reaction times were slightly different, they were still comparable. The same visual stimulus was used and was presented in the same visual scene. When reaction times under each condition were compared with the baseline reaction times measured, alcohol gave a 12.5% increase in reaction times, cannabis a 21% increase, a hands-free mobile phone conversation increased reaction times by 26.5%, texting by 37.4%, using a smartphone for social networking by 37.6% and using a mobile phone for a hand-held mobile phone conversation increased reaction times by 45.9% compared to the baseline condition
- See more at: http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Marijuana#Driving
 
Yeah I think it's safe to say that if you smoke weed err'day, you're addicted LOL

People who use it medicinally, to treat lack of appetite / nausea from chemotherapy, pain, or seizures may smoke it daily, but could easily quit, once the cause of their problem was removed, or a better treatment came along.

I had no withdrawal symptoms, following decades of daily use ("cold turkey" - abrupt discontinuation).

It's much healthier to eat it, if possible, although obviously people suffering from nausea may prefer to smoke it, but even then, would be better off vaping than smoking it.
 
Oh, don't get me wrong, I think marijuana addiction is very benign, esp. when compared to other addictions. I smoke marijuana more-or-less everyday for years and I had no problems quitting when I was forced to (by the court system a few years back). Honestly trying to quit caffeine was tougher for me than trying to quit marijuana was. But at the same time I don't really have a problem classifying myself as a "marijuana addict" currently, since I do smoke everyday and have for some time now. I look forward to smoking each day after work...I wouldn't have any problem quitting if I was forced to again, though, either because of legal reasons or health reasons, etc. But as it stands today I plan on consuming cannabis in some form or another until the day I die, something I can't really say for any other drug.
 
Legal drugs, such as alcohol and tobacco, still account for a greater burden of disease than marijuana, but this is because legal drugs are more accessible, and thus more widely used, not necessarily more dangerous, Volkow said.

BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT. I'm a reclusive graduate student and I know hardly anybody in my current city, but I can still get Cannabis whenever I want. I may be overreacting but I think this is a very tenuous claim.

People who use marijuana are at greater risk of abusing other drugs later in life, suggesting that marijuana maybe a "gateway drug." However, it could be that people who are more susceptible to drug use in general tend to start with marijuana because it is more accessible, and then move on to other drugs.

Emphasis mine. You're killing me here.
 
Nice post, NSA!


Clocktower, I think that in the first case the author is saying cannabis is less accessible than legal drugs, and in the second, that cannabis is more accessible than other illegal drugs.

As for the addiction thing, one can become addicted to anything that one does every day.
Gambling, running, even taking certain attitudes.
To me, if only 50% of daily users become addicted, that is amazing! Probably way, way smaller percentage than running.

However, to reply to several posters above, cannabis addiction is real. Trust me on this one :\
 
Thanks for posting this, slim.

I know we had a discussion on at least one of these arguments before.

I think given the recent increase in potency of pot combined with increased usage and lack of studies, it would take decades to adequately evaluate the effects.
 
Many people think that smoking pot is harmless, but there's good evidence that the drug has at least some negative effects on health, a new review says.

No shit.

Regular marijuana smokers are also more likely than nonsmokers to have symptoms of chronic bronchitis, such as daily cough and phlegm production.

Also no shit.

Legal drugs, such as alcohol and tobacco, still account for a greater burden of disease than marijuana, but this is because legal drugs are more accessible, and thus more widely used, not necessarily more dangerous, Volkow said.

On the flip side, this I don't buy for a second. A quick evaluation of the side effects of marijuana, tobacco and alcohol will clearly demonstrate that marijuana is much less dangerous to the user and to society.

Here are a few more highlights from the review:

- Despite the popular belief that the marijuana is not addicting, about 9 percent of those who experiment with the drug, and up to 50 percent who use it every day, will become addicted.

I think habituated would be a better term. I've never seen any evidence that marijuana is seriously addicting, just that some people have boring lives or use it to self medicate other problems.

- In people who are genetically at risk for schizophrenia, smoking marijuana is linked with an increased risk of developing the condition. However, its possible factors other than marijuana are responsible for the link.

I'm pretty comfortable with the idea of some degree of causal relationship when it comes to marijuana and certain mental illnesses, but I think more research is needed.

- It's not clear whether smoking marijuana increases the risk of lung cancer compared with people who don't smoke, but studies suggest that the risk of lung cancer is lower in marijuana smokers than in tobacco smokers.

Will be interesting to see what happens to those numbers in 20 years time if international corporations have gotten their hands on marijuana.
 
Top