• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Shambles

EADD seeks hot new mod action [THREAD SHOT ITS LOAD]

Status
Not open for further replies.
marmz. swamps. dan. geddit done.

Altho I *could* mod objectively (I've been a mod at other places), because I'm against censoring unless it's something that interferes with information or the HR stance (here anyway). A little <snip> here and there if someone crosses a personal line maybe at a stretch, but I couldn't indulge personal beefs with infractions, they can either be mediated (doesn't even have to be by a mod), or there's the ignore button, but more importantly posters can and should be encouraged to ask each other to remove something if it's THAT upsetting. So I couldn't enforce the BLUA verbatim if required to, unless as I already mentioned it gets in the way of HR/Info or is sourcing, all for which I have reported posts myself. If I cross a line on any of the above issues, and I'm asked to, I willingly delete my own posts. Encouragement of posters to manage themselves in this way often works imo, like Shammy and you did in the Speed thread the other day. Same for personal posts due to beefs.

[edit] Raas is someone else who's responsible enough to listen to advice, and often goes back and deletes stuff if someone suggests it crosses the line, or could easily be misinterpreted. So it can be a very successful way to deal with problems between posters and offense caused. People should be encouraged to do this more often. MOST posters are reasonable in this way[/edit]

Samhaingrim, Myshkin, Evil Elvis ... ie: Sammy G likes to report my posts, and I just managed to avoid an infraction from the other days shenanigans in the Fucked Thread. I doubt that goes down too well with whomever makes the decisions up top and I'm not about to change. Because I don't believe in that way of doing things. End of.
Instead: 'Marmz, could you remove that GIF please'? 'Yeah, ok'. Simple.
[edit] This is why transparency is good, and posters behave differently under the cloak of secrecy, than in public. Forced to air their beliefs in public and it's a different story. This is why Raas is a decent poster, because he's prepared to put himself up for scrutiny AND listen, and adapt with criticism from others. [/edit]

I don't think I've broken any rules by writing the above, since I didn't get an infraction, and I know we aren't supposed to talk about them, but I wrote it mainly to illustrate how Modding could be done successfully, without creating more work, but reducing it a little, if anything. I fundamentally disagree with large parts of how we are modded.
 
Last edited:
I've thought verrrry hard about it but there really is no way I can commit to owt this year, sadly. Am flattered by the votes of confidence, though. :)
 
I'm just praying for Shammy to do the deed.

You up for bribes, Shamz?

I'm serious too ;)
 
I dunno, I was imagining the kinds of things a dragon might sequester, guess I got a bit fanciful. I'll try to envisage a more quotidean hoard for you next time, mate.
 
3 nominations for swampy and as many for marmalade. Both good choices. Shambles has been a mod previoulsy juding by his 'crew status', he would be an excellent choice, should he want to do it again. AFAIK only wcote has publically stated he might probably apply. A good candidate IMO, he's allways given me good advice, is patient, and treats people with respect.

I would apply if i was at the end of my addictions and succeeded in conquering them, Somehow i feel I'd get more respect in that scenario than i would otherwise. But by then i may stop using EADD so much as i wouldnt be thinking about drugs all the time. I come here as much for the social threads as the drug discussions anyway. 8(
 
Yeah, the Jews are a vile cancer and a global conspiracy of evil, and I should ne allowed to express that.
 
I got a post UAd just for calling BHM a pathetic loser cunt, which is true, so this would be a big change in policy.
 
Yeah, the Jews are a vile cancer and a global conspiracy of evil, and I should ne allowed to express that.
Promoting hatred for a particular cultural, or specific group of people is an entirely different matter altogether.

I reported a mod in the lounge for doing similar but worse than you just wrote, much worse ... and over 5 posts in one mad rant.

However, I think what you wrote there should be allowed, as long as it's not followed by incitement. [edit] Because others can, and will tell you what an idiot you are for saying it (I know you were joking ... I'm just exampling the scenario)

It should be verboten for Mods to do it tho, imo
 
I got a post UAd just for calling BHM a pathetic loser cunt, which is true, so this would be a big change in policy.

I Dont think that should be UA'd, moved to the off topic wastebasket maybe, along with any other posts from the exchange (was out, didnt see what happened, apologies)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top