UK - Norman Baker on legal highs: This trade has claimed too many lives

edgarshade

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
1,954
Location
UK
Sunday People

15 Dec 2013
Normal Baker

With reader comments

Writing exclusively for the Sunday People, Crime Prevention Minister Norman Baker says he will review the current drug laws.

I’m determined to clamp down on the reckless trade in so-called ‘legal highs’ which have tragically claimed the lives of too many young people. We are already cracking down on the traders. The police are working hard to enforce the rules, and in one recent week 73 warrants were executed, 44 arrests made and seizures included thousands of pounds of cash and a firearm. But we can’t hope to stamp out this practice by simply leaving it to the police.

These drugs are being touted as legal alternatives to ecstasy or cannabis but manufacturers are trying to avoid existing laws by tweaking the chemical composition, or marketing them as “plant food” or “bath salts”. Users have no idea what they contain, and what impact these drugs will have on their health. People can’t be totally sure these drugs are legal, and our enforcement operations have found illegal drugs are being sold as legal. I want to take action to ensure we protect the public from dodgy drug manufacturers.

But rather than simply rushing forward with legislation, we’ve decided to do the sensible thing, and look at the problem with health experts, the police, local councils, and others. There are different approaches to combating “legal highs” across the world.

In Britain we use temporary bans to give independent experts time to tell us whether new substances should be permanently banned. New Zealand has chosen to regulate the market and give licences to those “legal highs” which are low risk, whereas the US ban drugs which have similar chemical composition. The review will look at the range of action we might take and I’m open-minded about its conclusions.

I want to raise public awareness - and I congratulate the Sunday People on the good work it has done in this area. People need to know what the rules are. They need to know that if they buy something, then they won’t wake up in Accident and Emergency. And I want to make sure young people can’t walk into a shop and buy drugs which can be stronger and more dangerous than many illegal drugs. That has to end.

More http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/norman-baker-legal-highs-trade-2928304
 
This doesn't look too encouraging. For a start he is blaming the "trade" when the fault clearly lies with prohibition of alternatives. Then what does "too many lives" mean? The 20 a day that get lost to alcohol or the 100 to tobacco? Or the "zero" lives lost to 6-APB and one from MXE (and that was a massive IM with MDAI ) before they were banned?

Looks like this guy is more interested in sounding "tough on drugs" than actually reducing the harm caused by the mis-regulation of them.

I wish I could post in the reader comments without using my "Facebook Identity".
 
Last edited:
This doesn't look too encouraging. For a start he is blaming the "trade" when the fault clearly lies with prohibition of alternatives.

If anything, prohibition drives innovation, and I tend to consider innovation a good thing. But I don't think prohibition and its resulting innovations is the problem -- it's the government's unwillingness to touch the situation with anything other than a night stick.

At one point, the UK reviewed the idea of letting these innovations run free in order to collect data with which to better-understand the situation, but pressure from somewhere stopped that plan in its tracks. In the U.S., Louisiana declared an emergency ban on several chemicals found in "bath salts" until the issue could be milked for political gain; later the federal government pointed to the zombie face eater who wasn't on bath salts, said "Bath salts," and the public overwhelmingly supported the ban.

Now, rather than treating these chemicals as a topic for medical and public health research, the U.S. sends in law enforcement, research becomes difficult or doesn't happen, and society remains largely ignorant of what these chemicals are and how to deal with them. They are little more than a zombie meme on Facebook for most people, and zombie memes are generally considered a poor source of public health information (except in Louisiana) by most doctors who have to make medical decisions.

Where am I going with this rant? Oh yes -- innovation is a standard response to legislation, public health problems should not be criminalized, decisions should be informed and based on research rather than politics and fear, and people are far more likely to slip and hit their head on a bathtub than they are to become psychotic from bath salts. In fact, the chances of winning the lottery are far greater than the chances of going on a bath salt-fueled cannibalism spree.
 
Top