• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Porn Appreciation Thread V. Druginfluenced Megawanking

I heard Cameron on the radio this morning, I really don't understand what he's proposing. He said he wants the "Internet companies" to help people configure their computers to block porn sites? What the hell has my computer's configuration got to do with my ISP? It's my fucking computer, I might be running a modified Acorn Electron, are Kevin Singh and Emma Bajpai from BT Internet trained up on 1980s home computers? Maybe that's a stupid example but get the fuck out of my system you cunts!
 
Not seen news but am assuming it relates to...


Porn depicting rape to be BANNED in crackdown on 'poisonous' websites as Cameron unveils protection for every home

PM warned that internet pornography is 'corroding childhood'
All internet-connected homes will be asked whether they want filters
And all new subscribers will have to opt out if they want obscene material
Porn simulating rape will also be banned under new legislation

(appylogies for heil linky)

Obviously you can "opt-in" to still be allowed to view "adult content" but you have to specifically ask for it which is a bit shite ("Yes ISP, I do enjoy rubbing one out to online viewing material sometimes") but surely it's just an excuse to bring in internet censorship in general. Who decides what is "adult content"? It's not like the paedo stuff is overly easy to find anyway other than on TOR and stuff is it? Dunno (not intending to ask Google either funnily enough :D) but do recall years ago it wasn't entirely uncommon to be confronted with kiddy pr0n (generally in the form of popups as I recall) when pottering around grot sites. The kinda people looking for that are hardly likely to be stopped by a borderline irrelevant blanket "adult content" block are they. Sounds highly suspect to me but who's gonna speak out against something sold as being an anti-paedo measure?

Also, the comments section is gold - most of 'em pointing out the hypocrisy of the Heil claiming moral victory whist 90% of it's stories are sold via the medium of scantily-clad wimminz, not to mention their distinctly distasteful glee when female slebs turn 16.
 
Shambles said:
Not seen news but am assuming it relates to...


Porn depicting rape to be BANNED in crackdown on 'poisonous' websites as Cameron unveils protection for every home

PM warned that internet pornography is 'corroding childhood'
All internet-connected homes will be asked whether they want filters
And all new subscribers will have to opt out if they want obscene material
Porn simulating rape will also be banned under new legislation

(appylogies for heil linky)

Obviously you can "opt-in" to still be allowed to view "adult content" but you have to specifically ask for it which is a bit shite ("Yes ISP, I do enjoy rubbing one out to online viewing material sometimes") but surely it's just an excuse to bring in internet censorship in general. Who decides what is "adult content"? It's not like the paedo stuff is overly easy to find anyway other than on TOR and stuff is it? Dunno (not intending to ask Google either funnily enough :D) but do recall years ago it wasn't entirely uncommon to be confronted with kiddy pr0n (generally in the form of popups as I recall) when pottering around grot sites. The kinda people looking for that are hardly likely to be stopped by a borderline irrelevant blanket "adult content" block are they. Sounds highly suspect to me but who's gonna speak out against something sold as being an anti-paedo measure?

Also, the comments section is gold - most of 'em pointing out the hypocrisy of the Heil claiming moral victory whist 90% of it's stories are sold via the medium of scantily-clad wimminz, not to mention their distinctly distasteful glee when female slebs turn 16.
Click to expand...

You said it perfectly, any freak who wants to find it will use tor already, this ban isn't going to stop them, but as you say not many are going to argue with such a law even if there is more to it than what they say. I wish they put this much effort in convicting pedophiles with harsher sentences.
 
How exactly do they plan to "expose" pedos who use the "dark web" ... ie TOR to view child porn, when the reason they are using it is because they can no be traced.

Are they going to just block TOR for everyone, or what?

Are husbands and kids everywhere going to have to come to an agreement, "yes, we would like the porn, thanks". ?
 
Hahahahhaa! Is gonna be sooooooooooooooo fukkin funny in households up and down the land as husbands and/or teenage sons desperately try to think up ways to be the one that gets to request they don't have the pr0n block on when the ISP contacts them :D
 
It might lower my expectations of women If I start using magazines again, pages and pages of women with hairy bum holes, burger tits etc all the good things you dont see on these internet pron websites.

Maybe I want to know how many threesomes stacy has had and how she loves to cheat on her boyfriend! Just thinking about the pages of saucy question and answer pages has got me at half mast.
 
I expect this to go the same way as

National Service for Teenagers
Minimum Pricing for Alcohol
Cigarette packaging

Dave
A leader for our times
 
Mendo_K said:
It might lower my expectations of women If I start using magazines again, pages and pages of women with hairy bum holes, burger tits etc all the good things you dont see on these internet pron websites.

Maybe I want to know how many threesomes stacy has had and how she loves to cheat on her boyfriend! Just thinking about the pages of saucy question and answer pages has got me at half mast.
Click to expand...


You sound so very well adjusted as it is. Who says the internet is creating a generation of creeps?
 
For anyone who doesn't know my nick on a different forum, with many of the same posters frequenting.. is Graceland. But EE reckons that its a coincidence that he or she shares it and has innocently plucked that nick and location out of nowhere.

Dont insult my intelligence please.

And Crackhead why indeed that without all the facts?
 
NightsEpiphany said:
For anyone who doesn't know my nick on a different forum, with many of the same posters frequenting.. is Graceland. But EE reckons that its a coincidence that he or she shares it and has innocently plucked that nick and location out of nowhere.

Dont insult my intelligence please.
Click to expand...

I thought 'Evil Elvis' was a little bit amusing as a name. Yeah, I know it's lame.

Elvis lived in Graceland. Evil Elvis might therefore live in 'Disgraceland'. See what I did there?

I assure you it has nothing to do with you whatsoever, whomever you may be. Sorry if I inadvertently upset you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top