I would describe them as normal men, whereas those women as whores. This is so politically incorrect but IMO it is "biologically correct". Before you ask, I basically say that no such thing as a man-whore exists, by definition only a woman can be whore, yes.
I haven't read many books on this theme, have no real knowledge of biology but I'll explain what I know hehe. I'll only be happy to be corrected.
First of all, no matter how developed our brains are we are still controlled by basic animal instincts to a huge degree, we can control them to some degree but far from completely and those instincts are different for men and women. Almost all males of all species want to mate with as many females as possible, while almost no females of all species want to mate with as many males as possible. In most mammals male world, there is always a small number of alpha males who get to fuck many females in their life, then there are beta males who only fuck few times in their lives and in some species like wolves there are even many males who never get to reproduce in their whole life. On the contrary, virtually all females get to reproduce in their lives, but only with a rather small group of males - mostly those alpha males. The logic behind this is simple, sperm is not rare while egg cells are rare. If a male mates with low quality female, usually in a few hours or even minutes he can succesfully reproduce again, maybe this time with better quality female. Or not, it doesn't matter that much - everything counts for him because in few hours he can do it again. While if a female gets pregnant with low quality male, it will take hundreds times longer compared to males before she has another chance, so she better chooses more wisely.
Now, of course humans are very complicated compared to other mammals and there is no simple definition of what is quality male or female. Looks are not everything, personality, money, sense of humour, confidence etc. are all part of attractivity but I still think that if a man sleeps with 100 women, it's somehow better than a woman who slept with 100 different men.
I also think that if a women commits adultery, it's kinda worse than when a man does it. Because most men are able to have sex with foreign women without any developing emotional feelings to them, for women it's much harder. If a woman regularly sleeps with a man who is not her patner, there is bigger chance she'll leave her former partner and children because eventually she probably will fall in love, while a man can still love her old wife even if he prefers to have sex with other women. I also believe that having a mother is more important for a child than having a father, which kinda forces women not to fuck with strangers when they raise children, I realize this sounds very unfair but nature isn't too fair either.
BTW I can recommend this book Why men don't listen and women can't read maps, imo that's a great book everyone should read, it's easy to read yet still based on scientific facts and explains how mans vs womans brains are so different.
I want to make clear that I do NOT consider woman brain NOR women at whole inferior to males. Just different. No stupid law about equality of genders is going to change my mind.
Now back to porn. And back to site I mentioned in original post. I highly doubt http://www.yourbrainonporn.com has anything to do with feminists. I read several articles there today and not a single one said anything about objectifying women. I personally think that men are objectified by modern porn just like women, if not more. HC Porn makes look all women as insatiable creatures who will do anything to make a man cum, but at the same time it makes look all men as agressive idiots who must have gigantic penises, have no respect for women needs and are unable to feel anything but pleasure from degrading women.
When in fact I read that real men have worse ability to deal with breaking up with their loved partners because 1)they avoid crying (I read that crying is a very healthy thing and personally also feel such a strong block being a man that I haven't cried since childhood) and 2) have less developed emotional centers. Women very rarely commit suicides because their crush don't love them. Unlike men, which could imply men are actually more sensitive and fragile on the inside than women.
I don't think an average woman can understand the FRENZY I (and many other men who took stims at home having already high libido) came through when I was home alone for the first time while way too high on mephedrone, having opened tens if not hundreds of tabs of porn, whenever I was close to cumming I just clicked on another vid and thought "this is the most fascinating thing I ever saw.. wait a second, what's in that thumbnail?" Every new porn vid probably released more dopamine again and again and again so I masturbated for a long time before cumming, and when I finally found a vid worthy coming I just snorted another line and repeated the whole process since beginning.
Depression which appeared the following day wasn't caused just by the mephedrone itself IMO, it also had to do something with disgust of myself from watching so much porn. Is wanking for 18 hours worth stomach cramps, diarrhea, lowering self esteem and racing heart? Of course not, but a man thinks otherwise while being high on crazy libido inducing drugs like meph or coke or meth.
This is why I avoid taking euphoric and erotic stims while being alone because I know I would spend the whole time by doing only one thing which fucking sucks. If there is anyone nearby to talk it's easy to overcome this urge, else not.
Most people don't take these drugs and they still can get addicted to porn, as I said I wouldn't underestimate its power and there are probably many men who should consider abstaining from "watching" porn (who the fuck just watches porn and not masturbate?).
Damn that must be the longest post I ever wrote on any forum, I just find this topci really interesting and am home alone anyway.. just drinking beer, which is OK and won't cause me to wank
Last edited:
