I think intellect surpasses attraction. As you get older and understand people better, you will outgrow immature attractions and develop more complicated ones. At least this has been my personal experience.
Absolutely, I was trying to convey a similar idea.

While I think that what we collectively deem as attractive is largely conditioned and almost certainly affects our individual tastes, I don't think that we consciously control the psychological forces that govern with whom with are infatuated. I think this is universally true among age groups. I'm talking more about infatuation and attraction, but I do think that those are necessary precursors for true love (not my preferred term to use here, but I'm linguistically constrained) although they do not guarantee a successful relationship. Of course preferences will shift and vary at any given point in someone's life, both on conscious and unconscious level. Certainly life experience and self-knowledge, which undeniably correlate with the process of maturation, will make it easier for us to differentiate between love and infatuation. But I think most people will encounter having a seemingly inexplicable and completely arbitrary attraction to someone that even they can't logically explain. Same can be said for human sexuality, which I'll avoid discussing at length right now because I don't want to get too off-topic.
I can look at woman and say that she's beautiful and not be attracted to her. I might look at a girl and not feel a strong physical attraction initially, but then find her irresistible when I get to know her. I have had times when I've become infatuated almost instantaneously, and I've had times where they developed much more slowly by comparison. Regardless, conscious reasoning played maybe a tertiary role if any at all when it came to attraction.
Passion is a very powerful emotion, and it is not easily subdued. I think it's important to temper passion with rationality. I just don't think passion is birthed in the same cognitive realm as our intellect.
-Gonna kind of ramble from here on out, but this is a topic that I find so fascinating and could talk about ad nauseum.-
I naturally have an aversion to plans and routines, and the same has been true in my love life. Whenever I was asked what my "type" was, I'd
try construct some nebulous outline of physical preferences, but then I'd find myself having an intense attraction to someone who might be superficially antithetical to whatever I had just described. I'd say I like brunettes, then I'd meet a blonde. Say I like dark skin, develop an attraction to someone who was fair or pale. The only thing I could almost guarantee, though I also was not privy to thinking in absolutes, was that I would be attracted to a woman. Still holds true today, but once again, not gonna delve into that. But yeah, I was still trying to find aesthetically based trends instead of looking at the similarities among personalities. So far, I've noticed several attributes that link ALL of my attractions in the past 7 years: (1) A very maternal aura or nature (2) sweet and very warm disposition (3) extroverted or having a strong social presence as perceived by outsiders.
Those are just the biggest and easiest for me to define. Of course I value intelligence, humor, etc., but those are kind of cop-out answers if I can't define them by my idiosyncratic interpretation of such qualities. It's like saying, "Well, I want her to be pretty", and then we're just dealing with another abstraction. There is a cultural consensus that we can agree upon, but that's so reductive of such a complex subject. IMO
Anyway, I think it's interesting that my intellect is only now being able to identify common traits that I believe to be true on an intuitive level