Marijuana Legalization Is Not Enough! Envisioning a Post-Prohibition World

slimvictor

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
6,477
Location
"Darkness cannot be dissipated with more darkness.
Pot-smokers of the world unite! You have nothing to lose but your pipe dreams.

Marijuana legalization is a beginning, not an end.

When residents of Colorado and Washington voted to legalize the adult use of cannabis, it felt like a momentary rush of sobriety in a country dazed by decades of anti-marijuana hysteria. But what comes next?

The drug war edifice is cracking and the end of prohibition may be nigh. Or may not be. The way things play out is not preordained. Major strategic differences among legalization proponents are surfacing about how to proceed. Some drug policy reform leaders, fearing an official backlash, are urging a cautious, go-slow, approach: make it as easy as possible for the Feds to back off and let the states do their thing. Other voices, claiming a pro-pot electoral mandate, are calling for bold, assertive moves to implement the will of the voters.

Some medical marijuana dispensary operators are celebrating the prospect of expanding into adult sales, while others worry about getting squeezed out as weaker players fold in an increasingly competitive, multibillion-dollar industry. Mom and pop growers in the Emerald Triangle of Northern California, America's cannabis bread basket, who've paid their dues over the years, cringe when they hear of post-election overtures to tobacco companies from single-issue obsessed, DC-based drug policy reform lobbyists who presume to speak for tens of millions of cannabis consumers.

The future of cannabis is up for grabs -- as much as anything can be in our ailing, corporate-dominated culture. So why not think big? Here are some ideas:

Tax and Regulate: Endorsed by 500 economists and several Nobel laureates, a 2005 report projected that ending marijuana prohibition in the United States would save $7.7 billion in combined state and federal spending, while taxing herb transactions would bring in $6.2 billion annually -- a net gain of close to $14 billion. Whatever funds that re-legalizing cannabis adds to federal and state treasuries should be matched dollar for dollar by cuts in the obese Pentagon budget, which currently exceeds the combined military expenditures of the next 21 countries on Earth. If the United States can't defend itself with a budget equal to the combined military expenditures of the next top ten countries, then America's military leaders are incompetent and ought to be dumped.

Cultivate: Implement small-is-beautiful regulations capping the number of marijuana plants in a way that favors family farms rather than agribusiness giants. Make organic farming practices mandatory and discourage high-energy intensive indoor grows. Tobacco companies -- or any businesses that Big Tobacco invests in -- shall not be permitted to grow cannabis or produce cannabis products. Tobacco farmers instead will be encouraged to cultivate industrial hemp, which was needlessly banished from the American agricultural landscape because of the war on drugs. Offer tax breaks for farmers and companies that engage in large-scale cultivation and production of fiber hemp, a versatile, ecologically sustainable plant with more than 25,000 known industrial applications -- everything from hemp clothing, food, and cosmetics to hemp surfboards, insulation, and car panels.

Exchange: Organically grown marijuana should be available for barter and purchase by men and women 18 years and older in licensed cannabis dispensaries, herb stores, farmers markets, whole (small w) food emporiums, and health clubs from sea to shining sea. Liquor stores, drug store chains and supermarket chains will be barred from selling marijuana because they sell dangerous, unhealthy products: cigarettes, booze, toxic household items, children's toys reeking of endocrine-disrupters, pharmaceuticals with pernicious, sometimes lethal, side effects, junk food loaded with corn syrup, neurotoxic additives and GMOs. In order to minimize exposure to these harmful substances while promoting cannabis commerce, it's crucial to disentangle marijuana from mainstream corporate monoculture.

Apologize: All marijuana prisoners must be freed immediately and the U.S. government should pay reparations to those whose lives were ruined because they were among the more than 20 million people arrested for violating U.S. laws against marijuana possession. Reparations should also be paid to medical patients -- including military veterans suffering from PTSD and traumatic brain injuries -- who have been denied access to marijuana or discriminated against because they used cannabis for therapeutic purposes. And the millions of U.S. drug war victims in Latin America and other countries should also be compensated. This won't ever happen given the astronomical sums at stake. In lieu of reparations, the U.S. government must issue a formal apology for waging a dishonest, destructive, and logically incoherent crusade against cannabis users at home and abroad.

Experiment: Medical marijuana in California, the first state to re-legalize the herb for therapeutic use in 1996, began as a laboratory experiment in democracy, and it has led to a cultural shift in favor of legalizing cannabis for personal use. A portion of the revenue accrued from taxing legal marijuana transactions should be used to underwrite other laboratory experiments in democracy -- in particular, green new deal work programs founded on the premise that a green economy entails more than producing environmentally benign consumer goods. Spearheaded by a burgeoning cannabis industry, a green economy will point the way toward novel forms of labor-sharing, voluntary simplicity, and local self-providing, while challenging the tyranny of the job system that was implanted during the industrial revolution. (Work yes! Jobs no!) Alienation and bleak prospects, not marijuana-smoking, are root causes of amotivation.

cont at
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/martin-lee/marijuana-legalization-is_b_2253690.html
 
am curious what some of your thoughts are regarding *current* inmates in the systems for marijuana-only offenses, should pot be legalized.

I see one line of thought that "if it was illegal at the time, you did the crime and everything stands", but otoh, if it's made legal that's <imo> de facto acknowledgement the original law was invalid and, accordingly, the inmates unfairly held.

Given how crucial marijuana is to the prison system, i'm very interested in thoughts on current pot-only inmates, and just general thoughts for the entire legislative system if its (largest? one of the largest..) cash-cows is suddenly pulled.
 
(any input on how we handled the legal situation of booze-offenses when our last prohibition ended may prove illuminating if anyone is familiar w/ that history)
 
the prison system is a function of those arrested, so yeah it is very big.
/i think one of us is missing something or misunderstanding the other; how are the courts/jails not directly affected by what LE can provide them?
 
/i think one of us is missing something or misunderstanding the other; how are the courts/jails not directly affected by what LE can provide them?

There's the misunderstanding. You went from prisons to courts/jails. I assume the jails will have very limited misgivings about releasing the short-term inmates serving marijuana detention, and the already-overburdened courts will welcome the opportunity to focus on more serious crime.

Here is data for cannabis and prisons btw, from http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Prisons_and_Drugs

(State and Federal Marijuana Prisoners)

Total Federal Prisoners 2004 = 170,535
Total State Prisoners 2004 = 1,244,311

Percent of federal prisoners held for drug law violations = 55%
Percent of state prisoners held for drug law violations = 21%

Marijuana/hashish, Percent of federal drug offenders, 2004 = 12.4%
Marijuana/hashish, Percent of state drug offenders, 2004 = 12.7%

(Total prisoners x percent drug law) x percent marijuana = "marijuana prisoners"

Federal marijuana prisoners in 2004 = 11,630
State marijuana prisoners in 2004 = 33,186
Total federal and state marijuana prisoners in 2004 = 44,816

Note: These data only address people in prisons and thus exclude the 700,000+ offenders who may be in local jails because of a marijuana conviction.

Source: Mumola , Christopher J. and Karberg, Jennifer C., "Drug Use and Dependence, State and Federal Prisoners, 2004," Bureau of Justice Statistics (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, January 2007) NCJ 213530, p. 4.
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/dudsfp04.pdf
==
Harrison, Paige M. and Beck, Allan J., "Prisoners in 2004," Bureau of Justice Statistics, (Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, October 2005), NCJ 210677, Table 1, page 2.
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p04.pdf
 
thank you that is actually very interesting, need to come back and digest it when i'm not doing a 5min "bluelight break" lol ;]

/nervousone- fwiw, and i'm just speaking for myself here, but when i click links like you just put there i immediately close them at first glance, if you open either i'm sure you can understand why. far too much information on the web, so my "pick/choose" instinct has me adn probably others disregard ppl's points if they're presented that way. that said, the privatization IS a problem that merits consideration, and doesn't need hyperbolic and/or '2nd tier' sourcing to make its point. Food for thought.
 
/nervousone- fwiw, and i'm just speaking for myself here, but when i click links like you just put there i immediately close them at first glance, if you open either i'm sure you can understand why. far too much information on the web, so my "pick/choose" instinct has me adn probably others disregard ppl's points if they're presented that way. that said, the privatization IS a problem that merits consideration, and doesn't need hyperbolic and/or '2nd tier' sourcing to make its point. Food for thought.

I'm sorry if you are too lazy to read a link that is presented in the "wrong way."

Feel free to consume whatever information you like - but facts are facts regardless of your "pick/choose instinct"

Either learn or don't. I personally don't give a shit I'm just sharing knowledge.

It is tremendously anti-intellectual to disregard information because you don't like the presentation. Food for thought.
 
I'm not in need of learning more on privatization of prisons, and was just trying to help you get your points across. If your inclination is to use links like the ones you did, it's likely we share the same POV on the subject of priv.prisons. I like to see the knowledge disseminated past crowds with "prison planet" and alex-jones associations, and you should too; i was merely offering a suggestion you may've found useful towards that end, and wasn't trying to insult or offend you.
 
Top