UK - Treat addicts, don't lock them up

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
Treat addicts, don't lock them up: MPs pave way to legalise drugs as they admit prison sentences are failing to deter offenders


Britain is losing the war on drugs and should consider the radical option of legalisation, a powerful committee of MPs will argue this week.

In a controversial move which could lead to yet another Coalition rift, the influential Commons Home Affairs Committee is expected to put pressure on David Cameron to establish a Royal Commission to draw up changes to the law.

The MPs have concluded that prison sentences – which can be up to life for dealers of heroin and cocaine – are failing to deter drugs barons, and may even be encouraging a crime-riddled black market in the substances.

Despite a youthful flirtation with the idea of drugs liberalisation when he first became an MP, the Prime Minister is now opposed to the idea – as is the majority of his party.

But a number of senior Liberal Democrats recently backed reforms under which drug users would receive treatment rather than be classed as criminals.

Last night, an MP on the Home Affairs Committee – which took evidence from dozens of witnesses, including comedian and reformed addict Russell Brand – told The Mail on Sunday that current laws were no longer ‘fit for purpose’.

The MP said: ‘The general view [of the committee] was that the drug laws in Britain are all a bit out-dated. We have a Drugs Act that’s really outlived its usefulness and that really belongs in the 1960s and 1970s.

'It seems to deal with the drugs world as a fairly simple market with a relatively small number of controlled substances out there. But that’s not the case.’

The MP added that, although the committee ‘had not reached a settled view’ on the decriminalisation of drugs, its members agreed Britain was ‘fighting a losing battle over drugs policy’.

Details of the report will not be revealed until its publication tomorrow, but it is understood that it will call on the Prime Minister to establish a Royal Commission on drugs to report in time for the next General Election in 2015.

Although the conclusions of such commissions are not binding on Governments, they have such clout that it is politically difficult for Prime Ministers to reject their findings out of hand.

The MPs are not expected to specify which drugs could be subject to the relaxation.

But their report follows the controversial decision by two American states, Washington and Colorado, to decriminalise cannabis – a move expected to be copied widely throughout the US.

The committee also studied the situation in Portugal where, for the past decade, it has only been an ‘administrative offence’, not a criminal, one to possess small amounts of any drug.

As a result, say supporters, criminal offences such as robbery have fallen, as have HIV infections from dirty needles used to inject heroin.

continued at -

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...prison-sentences-failing-deter-offenders.html
 
Its hard to believe that some people still think that zero tolerance and prison is the best way to deal with drugs. Can you imagine if we sent alcoholics to prison! Not for commiting crimes, or being violent, but simply for being an alcoholic.
 
Its hard to believe that some people still think that zero tolerance and prison is the best way to deal with drugs. Can you imagine if we sent alcoholics to prison! Not for commiting crimes, or being violent, but simply for being an alcoholic.

Good grief! Fleet Street would be a ghost town!
 
MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: This isn't the time to yield on drug laws

By MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT
UPDATED: 01:33, 9 December 2012

With reader comments

The British public are entitled to be confused about the law on drugs. They are beset on every hand by celebrities and retired politicians who argue that liberalisation will mysteriously reduce the problem. Active politicians, by contrast, insist that a war on drugs should still be vigorously fought, even if their actions may not match their rhetoric.

Meanwhile, there is growing disquiet about the effects – especially on the young – of cannabis, the most widely used illegal drug and one which for many years had a reputation for being mild and soft. Even if that reputation was ever deserved, new strains in common use are much stronger. And one persuasive study has strongly suggested a correlation between cannabis use in early teens and a measurable decline in intelligence. Hard evidence in this area is difficult to come by as the frontiers of mental illness are ill-defined, and it is difficult to measure the use and effects of a drug still banned by law.
This is hardly the moment for legislators to urge retreat.

Yet it appears from leaks that the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee has swallowed the celebrities’ propaganda and sympathises with moves towards relaxing the existing laws.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...t-time-yield-drug-laws.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
 
Top