Aus - Nile wants funding for heroin 'cure'

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
Aus - Nile wants funding for heroin 'cure'

THE NSW government should fund a trial of surgically-implanted naltrexone capsules to cure heroin addiction, says the Reverend Fred Nile, the leader of the Christian Democrats.

He has called on the Premier, Barry O'Farrell, to fund the experimental treatment which was a cornerstone of practices at a Sydney clinic slammed by the Coroner last month.

Convening a public forum on naltrexone at Parliament House yesterday, Reverend Nile showcased presentations from a West Australian doctor, George O'Neil, who manufactures naltrexone implants and runs a large treatment program in Western Australia using the chemical. Dr O'Neil has received millions of dollars from the West Australian government to support his program.

He and Reverend Nile met Mr O'Farrell after the forum yesterday.

Reverend Nile said he wanted the O'Farrell government to fund a trial naltrexone implant program based on Dr O'Neil's.

He also wanted a parliamentary inquiry into all drug rehabilitation programs in NSW, and an examination of the feasibility of forced or ''coercive'' rehabilitation for addicts.

On Tuesday, the Herald revealed that naltrexone implants were extensively used at a Sydney addiction clinic, Psych n Soul, in Ultimo, which was the subject of adverse findings by the Coroner late last month, and adverse evidence in medical, nursing and psychology tribunals over the past three years.

The Coroner examined the deaths of three patients who had attended the clinic for rapid detoxification performed in conjunction with the use of naltrexone implants, which have to be surgically inserted.

It was found that the clinic, run by the psychologist Dr Ross Colquhoun, appeared to ''have been run on a minimal expense basis, with patient care and staff skills very low in priority''.

Dr Colquhoun attended the seminar yesterday, handing out materials for an organisation called Drug Free Australia, of which he is a committee member.

Naltrexone is an opioid antagonist which blocks the effects of opiates such as heroin, methadone and morphine.

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/nile-wants-funding-for-heroin-cure-20121018-27txn.html
 
Its great that they're developing new ways to treat addiction but the people in charge of such devices must be professional
 
that place sounds awful. The idea of an naltrexone implant is scary itself. This is definitely not a new way to treat addiction, it's an old terrible way to treat addicts. I don't know why someone would impose this on themselves. I've heard of people cutting out the implant. There is no cure for opiate addiction, they should just say fuck it and put people on heroin maintenance or whatever opiate they prefer.
 
^ Iobgaine research shows there *is* a cure for heroin addiction and it can be applied quickly.

Australia's drug policy is in the stone ages, and surgical implants to stop addiciton sounds like something out of Frankenstein.
 
...and an examination of the feasibility of forced or ''coercive'' rehabilitation for addicts.

I've got a message for Reverend Fred Nile: Go fuck yourself.

Edit - The fact that this is being considered in Australia of all places is shocking, no matter how serious of a problem with opiate addiction/dependence/abuse they have there. Many (well, probably the majority of) long term users are self-medicating with their opiate or opioid of choice in an attempt to either stave off withdrawal or escape certain issues - albeit temporarily - they cannot deal with while sober (or both). And if you're gonna force these users to detox rapidly by precipitating an intense and agonizing withdrawal via saturating mu-opioid receptors with a long lasting and potent antagonist, you can bet your opiate naive behind that you'll be witnessing possibly several suicides. I cannot believe something like this would even be considered.
 
Last edited:
He also wanted a parliamentary inquiry into all drug rehabilitation programs in NSW, and an examination of the feasibility of forced or ''coercive'' rehabilitation for addicts.

That's the really scary part of this article. I'm sure I don't have to elaborate on how disgusting forced or 'coercive' treatment is, it's a violation of fundamental human rights.

As for naltrexone implants, I'm not opposed to the idea in theory, assuming the patient has complete control over beginning and ending treatment, but I'm not sure how realistic that is within the current healthcare paradigm. Besides, they're a purely symptomatic treatment, I mean how many actual success stories are there from people who've used them? I've never heard one.


Sounds like a typical small minded, moronic conservative dinosaur. We can only hope his kind are a dying breed in Australian politics.
 
Top