• S E X
    L O V E +
    R E L A T I O N S H I P S


    ❤️ Welcome Guest! ❤️


    Posting Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • SLR Moderators: Senior Staff

Uncircumcised

1. Ok so you should never get surgery done on anything? Theres a better chance of dying on the way to the hospital so that argument makes no sense, unless you just want to follow Murphy's Law your whole life.

2. I cant say that does or doesnt happen from person to person but Ive never met anyone who couldnt get it up because they were circumsized.

3. May have been true when humans walked around half-naked and without shelter. But for everyone outside of Africa this doesnt really apply anymore.
 
1. There is more risk than benefit, at least from a medical standpoint...because from a medical standpoint, there is no benefit

2. Its not a matter of getting it up (which has nothing to do with penile stimulation, its ll mental stimulation) or even of orgasming, but the ease of orgasm and the intensity of orgasm

3. You know the reason we wear underwear? I free ball it all the time, and it feels great...i wouldnt do that if i was rubbing up on my jeans without my foreskin.

again, do what you will, but be honest why. your body has nice natural defenses against all sorts of problems - why put it through stress for benefits that dont really exist
 
rincewindrocks said:
1. There is more risk than benefit, at least from a medical standpoint...because from a medical standpoint, there is no benefit

2. Its not a matter of getting it up (which has nothing to do with penile stimulation, its ll mental stimulation) or even of orgasming, but the ease of orgasm and the intensity of orgasm

3. You know the reason we wear underwear? I free ball it all the time, and it feels great...i wouldnt do that if i was rubbing up on my jeans without my foreskin.

again, do what you will, but be honest why. your body has nice natural defenses against all sorts of problems - why put it through stress for benefits that dont really exist
Click to expand...

Actually, there are some really cool medical benefits. It's far less probably to contract STDs if you are circumcised. It is also cleaner.
 
Umm.. Let's prevent STDs with this awesome modern invention called CONDOMS! As long as it's clean, it's dick. My SO is cut, and I love him the way he is, but hey, I wouldn't complain about a little more junk to play with. And a woman that would leave a man for the way his dick looks is just as bad as a man who wants a woman to have her labia cut off. Guys, do you ever actuall inspect a females genitals before just shoving it in there? Yeah, pretty small percentage of you. As a woman, I can say Im more concerned about how a dick FEELS than how it looks. And to the camping comment- if you were going camping for a week without bathing, any chick you would be screwing would be just as dirty and smelly, probably worse, because a vagina has plenty of natural folds that aren't chopped off for hygiene
 
define "inspect"?

I mean I definitely make sure everything is in order and not smelly before I just dive in
 
People need to shut up about it being more clean and preventing STDs!
Condoms are made to prevent he STDs
A shower is meant to clean the dick.
It's not "less clean" and you any man circumcised or not has a chance of getting a STD.

I don't think people should fight about it or even care about it.
Cut or not cut a woman shouldn't judge or give a shit a dick is a dick it's clean if the man showers and she should whine about getting a STD because bitch should be using a condom anyways.
 
Busty St Clare said:
I find the only ones who defend their foreskin like someone else cares are usually the uncircumcised. I circumcised my son for a number of reasons, one of which because it looks better than having a chewed up piece of gum stick to the end of it.
Click to expand...
defensive much?
of course the only ones who defend their foreskins are those with intact cocks! guys that get cut as infants never know any difference.
i mean, i don't care if you want to ritualistically mutilate your kid's genitals, but i'm not going to call you names for it. well, maybe...maybe i'm implying its child abuse, but no more than any religious practice forced upon infants by their parents.

sure it's more or less permanent and medically unnecessary, but i plan to get my kids tattooed before their 2nd birthdays and get my little girl some breast implants before she starts kindergarten, so i understand.

seriously though, i appreciate having a foreskin because it gives extra sexual pleasure. more nerve endings, you dig? exposing the glans permanently makes the skin thicker and less sensitive also.
but that's besides the point - this thread shouldn't be a circumcision vs foreskin debate.

as for aesthetics; matter of taste i suppose. i think intact cocks look better, but perhaps i'm biased because i have one.
i don't care that much what girls think...actually - that's a lie.
what i mean is that i don't have any problems with what girls think, because "chewed up piece of gum" or not...uh, it works just fine. exceedingly well. and well appreciated, at that. not to sound cocky - no pun intended.

but i can see why you'd want to get on the front foot about those weird looking natural male genitals - if you opened your mind to differing perspectives on life, you might not be able to live with your choices.
but that's ok; what you did to your son's penis is between you and him, when he's old enough to understand.

now if you'll excuse me, i'm going to get my girlfriend to do that amazing thing where she rubs my cock without pulling the foreskin back....aw yeah.
windsock pride!
 
Last edited:
My dick is uncut. The only girls that care are those nutjob religious zealot types.

Fundamentalists like to argue that being circumsized is somehow more "hygenic". Take a shower and actually use soap? Shocking idea, I know.
 
this debate is retarded-

instead of arguing maybe you should decide for yourself as an adult what you do with YOUR penis.

leave your kids genitals alone and let them make their own choice when they grow up.

i think any kind of mutilation of a persons genitals without their consent (babies cant talk...) is ethically dubious and unjustifiable. as a parent or carer i find that position untenable

let the person chose what to do with their own genitals.

religion as a justification for ANY kind of surgical procedure can fuck off also unless the person is an adult and is making their own choice:|
 
I was circumcised at age 19 as my foreskin was just too tight to retract and so made sex very uncomfortable and painful.
I have never regretted having it done. I prefer the way that it looks and it is easier to keep clean.
Guess it depends on whether you want to be a Roundhead or a Cavalier.
 
I've been with a couple of guys who were not circumcised, and honestly did not notice any real difference. Yeah, there is a little extra skin, but when it is erect it looks almost the same as a cut penis. Didn't get my son circumcised, as I couldn't imagine cutting off a piece of his little baby penis. Have you ever seen pictures of babies with that are freshly cut?? Its freaking horrible! And the little babies have to be strapped down in this awful little rack because they struggle so much. Cut guys don't want to feel inadequate but I really don't think torturing a little baby in his first weeks of life for so-call aesthetics is something that should be done at all.

Here's an appropriate poster:
391453_4252415316189_1074472673_n.jpg
 
From personal experience...
1. It doesn't hurt
2. There is no blood
3. Sex is fine and dandy afterwards
4. The only people who push for it to be banned are not actually circumcised or are women.
 
also keep in mind a lot of deaths from circumcision happen from either malpractice or unsanitary conditions (not trying to bring religion into this, but Jewish people specifically).

I mean I could die from getting my tonsils removed if the doctor fucks up so Im not sure why you are all trying to ban something that is totally optional anyway. Im glad my parents had it done, and if I have a child I would want it done too.

People get young girls ears pierced very young too, should we ban that because someone could mess the procedure up?
 
im not banning it, but i have a problem with people advocating for it when they are using bad information

you notice i am not saying anything to BstC...thats because he has stated that he had it done for esthetic reasons, and in his mind, he did the right thing. ok great.

but when you do it for "hygiene" or "std prevention" you are just being dumb...you might as well be advocating for phrenology
 
-Kitten said:
People need to shut up about it being more clean and preventing STDs!
Condoms are made to prevent he STDs
A shower is meant to clean the dick.
It's not "less clean" and you any man circumcised or not has a chance of getting a STD.

I don't think people should fight about it or even care about it.
Cut or not cut a woman shouldn't judge or give a shit a dick is a dick it's clean if the man showers and she should whine about getting a STD because bitch should be using a condom anyways.
Click to expand...

Exactly! I have actually found that most women prefer a guy who's uncut so to speak or atleast Ive not had any complaints and Ive even gotten the "oh thank fuck your cock is intact" :D. Thankfully i am not circumcised as Ive heard it makes getting off way harder. But yes condoms will prevent STD's as good as on a guy who's circumcised or not and if you actually wash your cock you should have no trouble with women complaining about your cock being unclean.

The only advantage i can see of being circumcised is that wearing a condom would be alot easier. Condoms that are too tight are absolutely no fun at all :(
 
I've only been with two uncircumcised guys, my first boyfriend and my current boyfriend.
The first time I didn't know any better.. Though I was a little turned off by it when I was giving him head. It was a little slimy...
With my current bf he has a nice wang lol and it's also really big. I honestly can't even tell its not cut when he's hard.

The most important thing with uncircumcised guys is they gotta keep it clean! It's really obvious when they don't. I know uncircumcised guys have a lot more sensation down there.. Personally I'd prefer to have better orgasms. But as a girl I think circumcised dicks are more attractive and better for oral sex. But either way, it's not a deal breaker the way hygiene and keeping their pubic hair under control are. I wouldn't discriminate against guys who are not cut.

Also, it depends on the penis lol. Sometimes its really obvious that a guy is not circumcised. Sometimes you can barely tell.
Circumcision keeps dicks cleaner is MYTH. The foreskin actually protects the head and keeps bacteria out. Back in the day people were ignorant and thought they knew better.. But cmon, everything on the human body has a person. We wouldn't have something totally useless that needs to be removed. And the only thing that protects against STDs are condoms. Period.
 
I must imagine all those wisdom teeth I extract every year.

I also knew a girl who was born with 6 fingers. They removed it to save her never being able to wear gloves in the Winter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top