Not sure about Nutts idea that taking psychedelics "mimics schizophrenia" - wasn't that idea demolished in the 50's? On a psychedelic you know you've taken a drug, when you have schizophrenia you think it's real. That's a pretty fundamental difference isn't it.
And I can't quite work out why he's changed to decriminalisation when he was such a fervent prohibitionist over GBL, he said something like "I have made a strong recomendation GBL is banned and I am very optimistic it will be within months. GBL is unquestionably as dangerous as GHB". He was an absolutely full-on, raging drug-warrior. If you'd breathed "How about we keep GBL legal mate?" he would have thundered abuse at you about the danger it posed to "the children".
Wonder when he had his road to Damascus moment? Or is he now just thinking he's burned his boats and legalisation is the only road that he can make any money and keep his name in the papers.
^^
But you still know you're tripping don't you?
I don't understand why this is surprising to anyone. He's never supported full legalisation of all recreational drugs. In fact, he entered most people's consciousness with his "scale of harm" back in 2007, where the suggestion was that drugs should be regulated based on their potential harms, rather than the current arbitrary fashion. You might not agree with him, but thinking that some substances (i.e. psychedelics) have low potential harm and should be less controlled, while others have higher potential harm, and should be subject to more stringent controls - is certainly a consistent position.
If you had never experienced a psychedelic drug before, and someone dosed you without your knowledge, would you know you were tripping, or think you were losing your mind?
Is this a trick question?
Didn't the CIA used to torture people by putting them to sleep, injecting them with a massive dose of LSD and then bring them round, tied upside down in a rapidly filling container of cold water.
He refers several times to concerns that he had poisoned himself
Which pretty much proves my point - if he thought he'd poisoned himself then he was perfectly aware he'd taken LSD. Y'follow?
How can it be a consistent position when he now supports decriminalisation of drugs and in 2009 he was demanding a legal drug be made illegal?
Don't know about that mate, yesterday I smoked some DMT on top of a fat dose of MXE and was pretty convinced that I needed a sectioning (for about 5 minutes).On a psychedelic you know you've taken a drug, when you have schizophrenia you think it's real. That's a pretty fundamental difference isn't it.
Don't know about that mate, yesterday I smoked some DMT on top of a fat dose of MXE and was pretty convinced that I needed a sectioning (for about 5 minutes).
In fairness, I can't think of a time when I've thought I've lost it when it was purely psychedelics involved, it's those dirty rotten dissociatives that give you the impression of insanity.
Probably best not to look too far. I've looked, can't find one. FnB looked, found one.
I think that any ArC6N (is that working for anyone else?)
I think it's the way they distort reality rather than replacing it, it's too believable. At non-hole doses anyway. Yet to find a hole on 3-MeO-PCP, always go batshit before I get there.
He doesn't support decriminalisation of all drugs. He supports decriminalisation of relatively safe psychedelics, LSD, psilocybin etc.