what's with this thread? only $800?
i'm no fan of this pseudo-gangsta footy wanker - but since when is $800 for possession some kind of outrage?
he's been hounded by cops and media, harassed at his home and everywhere he goes - and yes he could afford a good lawyer - so the charges were (rightfully) downgraded from possession with intend to simple possession. my (very poorly informed) understanding is that he was close to the limit for trafficking, but by no means drastically above it.
is this a thing, where people get sentenced and there is some automatic reaction people have that it was too lenient? like some dog-whistle of outrage?
you hear a lot of this crap on talkback radio and the like, but come on - he's a drug user, just like a lot of us here.
he's got issues with addiction - just like a lot of us here.
i don't think people should be charged for possessing drugs for their own personal use, and frankly i was disgusted that the wa police minister expressed his disappointment at the sentence, saying words to the effect of "jail might've straightened him out". bullshit. jail doesn't straighten people out, it locks them up with people of all criminal persuasions and forces them to toughen up to survive.
if there was any evidence that he was taking drugs to sell in rehab, then he should've been charged accordingly, but he's just a dickhead with a drug problem who gets too much attention for it. the media loves it, pushes and pushes to the point that he's stupid enough to smuggle an 8 ball of meth into a rehab stint.
who knows what he was thinking?
whatever he was up to, he's been through enough legal crap and bad publicity - i'm not sticking up for the guy, but he needs to be left alone so he can decide for himself that he has to get better.
bluelight is the last place i expected to see some thread bemoaning the (apparent) leniency of a drugs charge.