panic in paradise
Bluelighter
deuteronomy 22:28-29
this (along with other) bible verse killed christianity for me. a god who once commanded this bullshit isn't worthy of worship. how can this be explained or defended?
I could take this a few directions; some might say:
There are those who have not or can not find their guiding-light, and will seek a source much the same as nocturnal animals and insects. Some seem to live chasing what ever light they can see, while others remain insightful of such spectacles and are cautiously weary and questioning.
I do not believe Deuteronomy to be the word of God. But rather the word of many wishing to create such a 'guiding-light' to ultimately cause a separation between the seeking masses, and the found.
~
Or -
:D
Back then it was suggested a girl to remain a virgin until she married, and this would make it impossible morally for a man to have sex with an unmarried women.
"Rape" is a bastardized term used to defile or deface anything from its original context, origin, or an act carried out which causes repercussions unto another without their consent. Deuteronomy 22:28-29 could be considered 'statutory rape' or a civil-suit. Their act also was not contrived in love, if the act of man and women making love is sacred, and to be shared in such a way only in marriage.
"and they are discovered"
If upon discovery their act of lust and pride will wreck the fathers(head of house)of the girl in questions pride, and upon consequence the families esteem publicly too. So the boy in question must pay her father with money, which more then likely would of come from his father and family. The money would be to only try and re-compensate the pride issue, the marriage* would be an attempt to prove or establish love. It is an attempt to create a balance, a social scale of justice.
_________
*this seems to instigate a massive social-disharmony
:-\
Last edited: