• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: Tronica

eddie maguire herold sun PRO DRUG decriminalisation article!

headdah

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
1,430
Location
Go Team Pluggin'
I HATE drugs. I hate their guts. I hate the human misery that the illicit drug industry thrives on.
Sign up for your free 2 month trial

How could you not be devastated by the situation in which Ben Cousins and his family find themselves?

How do two beautiful girls I went to primary school with have their lives brutally ended being bashed to death while working the streets of St Kilda to feed a habit?

But what to do?

Well, clearly something different. It is time for Australia to look at so many of our social and economic needs and plan a course not built on tradition and religion and moral mumbo jumbo, but on reality and innovation. Time for some politicians to boldly lead.

It's time for Australia to look seriously at decriminalising drugs.

The war on drugs is over. We lost. If the definition of madness is doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result, then surely we are all mad to think anything is going to get better in the future.

It's only getting worse and those profiting out of the sale and manufacturing of drugs, organised crime cartels, are only getting bigger, badder and richer.

We read criminals are moving offshore in their manufacturing of drugs, to Pakistan and India, where the danger of being busted is considerably less than here.

Naturally, the associated human misery that goes with this business, prostitution and the human slave trade, is booming.

Currently the guess is that the illegal drug market in Australia is anywhere between $7 billion and $12 billion a year. We spend a further $4 billion-$5 billion a year on the "war on drugs".

According to the National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund, Australia spends about 56 per cent of that money (more than $2 billion) on law enforcement, and just 22 per cent on prevention.

Ask any senior police officer, as I did this week, and they say that while that $2 billion may see some crims locked up, that doesn't make any impact on the supply chain.

Once one crime king gets rolled the vacuum is quickly filled by the next would-be Carl Williams or Tony Mokbel. And why not?

It's time for Australia to look seriously at decriminalising drugs

Why would any kid go down the old path of studying hard and graduating from university with a debt and a starting wage of $60,000 a year, when you can have the flash car, the hot girlfriend, and the gangster glamour lifestyle as seen on TV by being a drug dealer?

The two biggest financial costs of our losing war on drugs are policing and imprisonment.

Both, in real terms, are useless.

From a purely financial point of view - taking into account current users, a reduction in price of drugs, the saving in policing and imprisonment and a "sin tax" rate similar to the tobacco industry - back-of-envelope projections would see the Government pocket $5 billion a year.

Remember, all this is going on anyway.

So we have around $5 billion to use on rehabilitation, advertising and teaching -- which we have seen have remarkable success in lowering the use of tobacco, and changing the social standing of drink-driving and speeding on our roads.

Once decriminalised we can start to work on the reality of the problem, not pretend it's not happening.

Every week people are putting chemicals into their bodies with no idea of what they have been made from.

That ecstasy pills are often cut with "rat killer", so that tiny shards of glass cut your insides and cause the drug properties to have a greater effect, shows the ingenuity and horror of the business.

At least with a regulated drug industry people will know what they are getting.

And let's stop kidding ourselves, Australians are among the biggest users of drugs in the world.

We, as usual, pay the highest prices and as a result are becoming one of the world's best markets for international drug cartels.

Yes, we are cashed up, coked up, increasingly motivated by the "glamour" and are an ever-growing market.

Cocaine use in Australia is reportedly at its highest level.

Amphetamines, including speed, ecstasy and crystal meth, are believed to have 100,000 users.

Australia has the third-highest rate of drug use in the world and five times the global average.

The most recent national household survey on drugs (2010) reported 7 per cent of people over the age of 14, yes 14, have used amphetamines.

It was only in 1971 that US president Richard Nixon declared a "war on drugs". It is reported that in that time $1 trillion has been spent, only to see the strength of drugs increase, the price decrease and the availability and drug problem explode.

Even worse, instead of a regulated industry we have handed a monopoly business worth an estimated $400 billion to the worst and most dangerous people in the world.

Thanks Dick. And we thought Watergate and Vietnam were Nixon's lasting legacies.

Retired chief of Seattle police Norm Stamper is a spokesman for Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, a US organisation of 13,000 current and former police officers, prison warders, prosecutors and judges.

"Every once in a while someone in government has claimed progress," he said during a visit to Australia, "but they've been wrong. The immutable law of supply and demand will continue to work its magic forever.

"Purity and prices will fluctuate, people's behaviour will fluctuate, but there has never been any point in the drug war we've come close to winning. It is unwinnable, and it's immoral."

Maybe the time has come to take a new approach, one that looks at drug abuse as a health issue rather than a criminal one.

And here are some happy thoughts to finish on.

Reports recently suggest that the Mexican drug cartels see dear old Aussie as a fertile market.

In Mexico one person each half-hour, yes 48 per day, is executed in drug-related violence.

Since the President launched a crackdown on the drug cartels 47,515 people have died in the past five years. Many victims are police and civic leaders who have been tortured and beheaded.

The killers are protecting a business worth $13 billion. Our new partners.

I don't even know if I agree with this column.

But I sure as hell don't agree with what's happening in our schools and streets, nightclubs, footy clubs and backyards now and I sure as hell don't like the way it is trending.

What I do want is a serious debate to see what our world would look like if we changed things up.

I'm sick of people being shocked and sanctimonious when someone like Ben Cousins' life explodes and we hope it will magically change.

That is insanity.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion...-evil-drug-trade/story-e6frfhqf-1226315378571

P.S.

I have beaten Drug_M in posting this article. I WIN.
YES IT FEELS GOOD TO WIN. ;D

how does it feel to be a looser D_M? <3

;D :D :D:D
 
Last edited:
Not really the best article but it is promising to see an article like this being written by an influential Australian such as Eddy Maguire, not that I really think it will inspire much change but it is encouraging to see none the less. It definately seems like more and more people are switching on to the futility of prohibition but I fear we are still a long way away from the idea becoming mainstream.
 
I read this on the train this morning, was happy to see it. I read the first few lines expecting the usual trollop, so I was quite surprised when he brought out decriminalisation. Especially in the herald sun! It's good though, the idea is slowly getting out there. At least the first steps are being taken.
 
^yes, this and the article which appeared on The Age website today headed "Ban on fake pot fails to drag drug off shelf" seems to point to at least some recognition of the futility of trying to repeatedly ban substances which people are determined to consume.

The article acknowledges that after the banning of certain common and widely available synthetic cannabinoids last year, the result has been the emergence of new, more potent, less known, and potentially more dangerous substances to take their place. What's to say that after the May 1st bans, there won't be some other creative side stepping of the law to allow new things to take their place?

Every time something is banned, a new (and often more powerful) thing appears to take its place. Some of these things are frighteningly potent and unforgiving if misused: MDPV, phenazepam, AM2201, bromadol....

Some of these substances make the 'old classics' seem tame and decidedly benign by comparison. At least we have years and years of data - based on human experience - pertaining to the effects of cocaine/amphetamine, diazepam, cannabis, morphine.

I don't think these articles will change anything much in the short term, but any recognition of the harm caused by continued resistance to drug law reform that appears in the mass media has to be a good thing.
 
Glenn Greenwald's 2009 investigation and report on how Portugal's drug decriminalisation policy, implemented in 2001, has worked out for them is certainly a good read and case study on the subject.
 
Last edited:
The idea is really starting to get out there, even among more conservative crowds. 5 or 6 years ago there wasn't a chance a single paper would run this kind of article, let alone Herald Sun.
 
so maybe, total decriminalisation for drugs is not as far away as we think it is.

Maybe within 5yrs?????

or even less????
 
Wow. Something that this big headed goose wrote that is readable. AND it's in the Herald Sun. Hang on, that was written on April 1. Coincidence?
 
^ True that. April Fools bitches.

Seriously though, I don't even want to think how many people have to die so I can have my own personal right to inform myself and put what I want in my body.

I have never EVER injured, hurt, or even seriously offended someone because of my drug use.
 
I just hope organisations that support harm minimisation, and other that support legalisation put Eddie on the 'speaking circuit'. Afterall, the only way to change people's minds is to get them to think about the issue rationally, rather than taking the irrational, emotional approach which many rednecks take.
 
Good read, Eddie is going about it the right way. Not disreguarding the harms of drug use, but highlighting the fails in the drug war, and admitting that the war is already lost.
 
Finally a good read and someone has brought it up although few misconception in the articles. Dont know about Australia having the most drug users per capita in the world. I know of a lot of places (lived in few) where there seems to be a greater number of users than here. Do they take the purity levels into account? I mean overseas most of the time you only need half/quarter of the amount than here. Although Aussies def spend way more than anyone on this planet.
 
^
Agreed,
America had an estimated 100 million ppl who had tried ectasy in 2002 with an estimated 2 million new users every year. thats a much higher % then here.
 
^100 million users in the USA seems really high, that's 1 in 3 people. Or are you talking all of america?

I thought the rate of people who had used mdma in the USA to be around 5%, but I guess it's a hard thing to properly measure.
 
Dont know about Australia having the most drug users per capita in the world. I know of a lot of places (lived in few) where there seems to be a greater number of users than here.

Overall the most credible studies I've seen definitely show Australia as having one of the highest (Usually #1) drug use per capita in the world. That is not for any single drug however, more a trend. Although I'd say our ecstasy usage would almost definitely be the highest.

Would love to find a link with a pretty graph to go with it but I honestly cant remember where to look.

@thestudent. Really? I highly doubt that figure, that would put it at around 50% of Americans have tried MDMA. Now I'd say thats not far off the mark for Australia, but the USA?
 
I find it hard to believe that Australia use more pills than the UK, particularly now there are more MDMA floating about in both countries. Cost per pill has always been at least a third in London and it seems almost every one is on it. It is rare for an Aussie to eat more than 5 pills in a night but I regularly knew poms who'd think nothing of necking 10 or more. The cost of coke also limits its serious use here.
 
I read an article recently that had Australia listed as one of the highest drug using countries per capita according to some recent research, I think it was referring to pot primarily though that's probably where this whole comment stems from. It's also quite possible I read that article from a link on BlueLight. Anyone else remember anything like that within the last few months?
 
^ The figures are based on "have used drug x in lifetime" rather than "I necked 10 pills every weekend for 6 months".

The latter is impossible to work out until recreational drugs become controlled.
 
Has anyone here ever been asked about their drug use? Personally I always answer "no" as I have nothing to gain from identifying as a drug user. I'd take any research with a grain of salt.
 
Top