Where the Republican candidates stand on drugs

23536

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
7,725
Location
Stop resisting!
. . .

Newt Gingrich

As House Speaker, Gingrich introduced the Drug Importer Death Penalty Act of 1996, which would have legalized the execution of any person caught smuggling drugs into the US more than once, so long as the individual carried 100 or more doses (an ounce of high-grade marijuana could conceivably qualify). First time offenders would have faced life in prison and defendants would have a window of just 18 months to file their one and only appeal.

While the law did not pass, Gingrich expressed his support for, in his own words, "very draconian" measures as recently as last year. In an interview with Yahoo News last November, Gingrich noted how "successful" Singapore has been in its response to drug trafficking.

"They've communicated with great intention that they intend to stop drugs from coming into their countries," Gingrich explained.

Brad Adams, executive director of Human Rights Watch Asia Division, has a different take. "Singapore routinely executes people for drug trafficking. They consider themselves as having about the harshest drug laws in the world," he said. "It's not something to be emulated."

Following in Singapore's footsteps, he pointed out, would require the US to send, "thousands and thousands of people to death sentences annually."

. . .


Mitt Romney

While Mitt Romney has been less vocal in his views on drug policy, his record as governor of Massachusetts and his interaction with potential voters suggests a deep reluctance to reform.

In one 2007 video a medical marijuana user asks if the former Massachusetts governor would have him arrested for his choice of medication. After saying that he is opposed to medical marijuana, Romney turns his back on the wheelchair-bound young man, leaving his question unanswered.

"Even apart from the medical marijuana," Nadlemann says, "he has been just terrible on this issue."

Nadlemann refers back to 2006, when then-governor Romney vetoed a bill allowing pharmacies to provide individuals clean hypodermic needles without a prescription. The measure would have cost the state nothing, and health experts argued it would help curb the spread of infectious disease. In addition, proponents noted, it would have saved funds otherwise spent on emergency medical care.

Romney argued the program would have "unintended consequences" and encourage the use of heroin. The Massachusetts legislature ultimately overturned Romney's veto, joining 47 other states that allow access to clean needles.


Rick Santorum

Like Romney, Rick Santorum has been relatively quiet on the issue of drug policy. Also like Romney, a videotaped encounter has provided insight into what the former Pennsylvania senator knows – or chooses to ignore – about drug policy.

Earlier this month Santorum was confronted by a member of the group Students for Sensible Drug Policy. The candidate, who has framed himself as a champion of family values, was asked whether he would continue to send non-violent drug offenders to prison as president, a punishment that routinely tears families apart.

Santorum responded, "Wow … the federal government doesn't do that."

In fact, drug offenders make up nearly half of the federal prison population, almost 100,000 people. According to the US department of justice, in 2009 the most serious crime committed by over 95,000 prisoners was a drug charge.

In a second video posted by the group this year, Santorum cops to being uninformed. When asked about states' rights and the federal government's role in enforcing medical marijuana laws, the presidential hopeful says, "I don't know my medical marijuana laws very well." He then goes on to say, "they are a hazardous thing for society."


Ron Paul

An ardent libertarian, Ron Paul stands apart from his competitors. Paul has explicitly called for an end to the war on drugs, arguing the effort amounts to a colossal waste of money. He did not mince words speaking during a November presidential debate when he said flatly, "I think the federal war on drugs is a total failure."

Paul points to the disproportionate impact drug laws have had on communities of color resulting in the ballooning prison population. Running for president in 1988, he made a stop at the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. It was the same period in which a series of racist newsletters bearing his name were being circulated. Still, the congressman from Texas noted discrepancies in the persecution of ethnic groups based on the substances they were believed to enjoy.

Paul pointed out that while ethnic groups were persecuted for their association with certain substances, the abuse of alcohol, which he argued was the preferred intoxicant of congressmen, was not used as pretext for targeting people.

More recently Paul has said that the prohibition of drugs in the United States directly contributes to Mexico's soaring death toll – now estimated at least 50,000 – by bankrolling ultra-violent cartels.

Like alcoholism, Paul claims, drug abuse should be treated as a medical issue. He has co-sponsored legislation in favor of medical marijuana and believes that Drug Enforcement Agency raids on medical marijuana clinics are unconstitutional.

At its core, Paul believes the drug war represents an unjustifiable assault on individual liberty.

. . .

full http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jan/25/florida-primary-candidates-drug-policy?newsfeed=true
 
Honestly as long as Gingrich doesnt win I dont think anything will change. In this election cycle the status quo is about the best thing we can hope for.
 
Honestly as long as Gingrich doesnt win I dont think anything will change. In this election cycle the status quo is about the best thing we can hope for.
We could hope that the GOP candidates ruin each other's chances of getting elected and Obama actually does something about this during his next term, since he wont have to worry about being running again. Still a pipe dream though...
 
if ANY republican gets office you can say good bye to medical marijuana and count on the continued arrest of non-violent offenders and being set back YEARS on the drug war debate.


im not including paul because as someone else said...he isnt a "real" republican.
 
the thing is Obama isnt our friend either. Under his command the drug war has continued the fed are still raiding medical marijuana despenseries. I think we are making progress the fact that there is public discussion on the issue is a success in itself but we need a few more election cycles before it even becomes a second tier issue.
 
But he is not a real Republican!

im not including paul because as someone else said...he isnt a "real" republican.

What exactly is a real republican? He's been a serving republican for nearly two decades. "Republican" is a brand name not necessarily an ideology, there are christian conservative republicans, libertarian republicans, more moderate republicans, neocons etc.
 
What exactly is a real republican? He's been a serving republican for nearly two decades. "Republican" is a brand name not necessarily an ideology, there are christian conservative republicans, libertarian republicans, more moderate republicans, neocons etc.

he has always run for president under "independent"


and imo the term "republican" includes ideology as much as anything else. stances on abortion, economy etc.
 
Hmm its a tough choice :P

Honestly, I'm a democrat, living in a democratic state, but I still support Ron Paul and I'll vote for him even if my vote means nothing, cuz my state will vote dem.
 
I usually categorize a republican as someone who makes their political agenda geared toward Traditionalist/Christian family values.

Fortunately those are deteriorating as the divorce rate continues to sky rocket.

Less republicans, more libertarians and liberals. Then we have a real war.
 
Top