Well, 2C-I was not that cool.

[Neo1]

2C-I in a class of its own

I think drugs are better described in terms of categories of effects rather than by comparing them to other drugs. Visual, thought-provoking, spiritual, sensual, stimulating, relaxing etc.

These compounds are all so different and have their own character. When I first came across MDMA, I had been given the impression that it is "LSD without hallucinations". That's about as far from the truth as you can get.

I view 2C-I (which I like) as stimulating, visual, and fun, with full psychedelic effects at higher doses (cosmic thoughts etc.). That's about as far from MDMA as LSD is.

 

[Jamshyd]

If you agree then don't post or read it. That will help it die.

I tell you why I compared it. Because it seem/feels way more similair to MDMA than not.

Hum ... yep that makes sense

You were comparing 2C-I to "pills". You can compare 2C-I to MDMA as two drugs by themselves. You are telling me "some MDMA" and "some MDMA". Is not MDMA, MDMA?

That being said, I find 2C-I infinitely superior as a psychedelic (read: as a psychedelic) to both MDMA and MDA, regardless of pill quality.

 

[Xorkoth]

bump