A) Synthesis discussion is bad juju. Leave it out, unless you bear the cross of armless teenagers blowing up Daddy's garage after stumbling across "super Heroin easy synth!".
B) And how exactly do you plan to explain the death via anaphylaxis of the IV users innocent to the immorality of selling on not just impure Diamorphine, but a shoddy kitchen-chem cock-up leaving unreacted pill binders, titanium dioxide and leftover DHC reactant to fill the lungs with bubbling fluid?
C) If you're gonna manufacture potent narcotics like DHM properly then I would imagine access to pure DHC is no issue. If you're DIY extracting and altering the minuscule amount in fucking Paramol and selling it as "super Heroin" then you shouldn't be cooking drugs.
I never mentioned any details on the synthesis, just that it could be done, I'll not mention any more as it comes close to describing details about the synthesis but that 'miniscule amount' isn't so minuscule when
extracted (extraction is not synthesis so I'll mention it).
I never described any part of the synth, nor did I direct anyone to a site that described it; I just said it was possible.
As for the name, I remember clonazapam going around as 'super blues' same goes for MXE being sold as 'Rhino ket', there is an awful lot to be had in a name.
EDIT: No offence, but you made a lot of assumptions, you seem to think I have no chemistry experience whatsoever whereas I'll be heading to uni (in a year) for a course in pharm-chem; you seem to think I'm some idiot with no grasp on what I'd be doing other than "go to website, read recipe, hope it works" . That being said,
desomorphine (not highly impure krokodil) sounds interesting, it's definitely on my bucket list.
I'll not talk about synth and I stayed as far away from the topic as possible basically saying the equivalent of "You get bread, do something to it, it comes out warm and crispy, you can butter it and eat it" Rather than saying "put the bread into the toaster" and I stand by the fact that I didn't bring it up; some of the posts on here about making a 2 step legal high go into more detail about synthesis than anything I said.
Back on track
Non-psychoactive prodrugs do not fall under this act as it requires a subject to synthesise the working drug I think the research will follow this path. If labelled "not for human consumption" they obviously aren't intended to be psychoactive,I assume they're working on rational drug design to do just this. No playing around in your house with reagents, simply consume and get high.
Also interestingly enough poppy heads seem to be selling as usual. I'd love to extract the morphine from them; I need to read up on how the mass extraction from poppy straw is conducted and see if there would be a viable lab way to do it. In my poppy tea years I always found that the second extract (using frozen poppy straw) was always more potent (but tasted like bacon fried in piss), I've always known that morphine is stored inside the plant cells but recently realised that freezing would break their cell walls a whole lot more than a blender so I could probably divise my own morphine
extraction by freezing blended poppy straw, straining it then purifying it.
