Aszazin said:
my weight is about 57 kg
(most pharmaceutical dosages are calculated i thought for people around 70kg, not sure)
Not sure if you are suggesting that weight plays a factor with indole/PEA psychedelics, but it doesn't. I've tripped with many different folks, people of all shapes and sizes, and there was never any correlation/connection between level of intensity/effects and one's body weight or fat levels.
Originally posted by StickGreen513
Ive read MG seeds report on it bieng pretty damn psychedelic. I am wondering in what way is it psychedelic? like mindfuck,body buzz? what?
I think I did as good a job as possible in describing my DiPT trip. I can't think of what else I could add. The report was very detailed and you should be able to understand "what way" I found it psychedelic. And a body-buzz has nothing to do with "psychedelic," or rather I would not label a body-buzz as a psychedelic (mind-expanding) effect. Perhaps read the report again. Sometimes when I read something again, I seem to "pick up more" than I did the first time. Maybe you will get more if you do.
Originally posted by VictorBorge
It's still psychedelic, but much less noticeably so than many other chemicals. I would put it on the order of 2C-T-21 or another mild PEA in terms of overall strength of psychedelic effects.
I'd have to disagree with you here. I found the experience
VERY powerful. 70mg brought me to a strong plus-three that at times (when I experienced the sense of mystical oneness with everything as my ego slipped away and I became one with the rock I was on and the stream I was sitting by) went into a plus-four experience. A friend was with me and he took the same dosage as I did. But at 70mg, he got nothing more than auditory distortions, and some minor visuals. But no real psychedelic (mind-manefesting/expanding) effects. Kind of what many who dismiss DiPT seem to experience. I thought I had a unique, one-of-a-kind trip but a few weeks later he took 100mg and, at that level, it brought my friend to a very similar place that I got to with 70mg. He even experienced a meeting with a computer-blip sounding spirit that sounded like the one I met from his description.
Though I've never taken 2C-T-21, I hear it frequently compared to 2C-C in terms of depth. And DiPT sure beat 2C-C in intensity and depth, hands-down. I believe, and my friend also feels this too, that DiPT is
very set and setting dependant. This psychedelic seems to "open the mind" mostly through the auditory channel. It is through that sense that "information" is obtained. I had the entity contact, and it was an auditory thing. I could feel the presence of many beings, but could not see them like with DMT. And then one started communicating with me. Well, it is all in the report I wrote so I won't rehash it again.
But yeah, DiPT is best experienced at night in complete silence. And I believe it works best in nature. I took it by a stream coming down from the rocky mountains. If taken in this kind of setting, I'll bet everyone would have a very special experience. No one should dismiss DiPT as a mere novelty until they try it in a similar setting as I did. I believe only then, will the real nature of DiPT begin to be experienced. Though I'm glad it's not popular. It's one of the best and I'd really hate to lose that one. Not just because
I enjoy it and find it useful, but because it is a facinating tool to study auditory perception. Someone needs to figure out how to radiolabel it, and see where it goes.